dry anaerobic digestion of municipal solid waste and digestate ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

RISE-AT. (1998). Review of current status of anaerobic digestion technology for treatment of municipal solid waste. Retrieved October 25, 2008. Chiang Mai University, Institute of Science and Technology Research and Development. http://www.ist.cmu .ac.th/riseat/ documents/adreview.pdf. Rivard, C. J., Himmel, M. E., Vinzant, T. B., Adney, W. S., Wyman, C. E. and Grohmann, K. (1990). Anaerobic digestion of processed municipal solid waste using a novel high solids reactor: Maximum solids levels and mixing requirements. Biotechnology Letters, 12 (3), 235-240. Ruggeri, B., Tommasi, T. and Sassi, G. (2010). Energy balance of dark anaerob ic fermentation as a tool for sustainability analysis. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 35, 10202-10211. Sanchez, M., Gomez, X., Barriocanal, G., Cuetos, M.J. and Moran, A. (2008). Assessment of the stability of livestock farm wastes treated by anaerobic digestion, International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, In Press, doi:10.1016/j.ibiod.2008.04.0 Schafer, W., Lehto, M. and Teye, F. (2006). Dry anaerobic digestion of organic residues on-farm- a feasibility study, Agrifood Research Reports, 77, 98. Retrieved July 16, 2008 from www.mtt.fi/met/pdf/met77.pdf. Sharma, V.K., Testa, C., Lastella, G., Cornacchia, G. and Comparto, M.P. (2000). Inclined-plug-flow reactor for anaerobic digestion of semi-solid waste. Applied Energy, 65, 173-185. Siebert, S. (2008). Quality requirements and quality assurance of digestion residuals in Germany, In Proceedings of ECN/ORBIT e.V. Workshop 2008, The future for Anaerobic Digestion of Organic Waste in Europe, Weimar, Germany. Siles, J.A, Brekelmans, J., Martín, M.A, Chica, A.F. and Martín, A. (2010). Impact of ammonia and sulphate concentration on thermophilic anaerobic digestion. Bioresource Technology, 101, 9040-9048. Smith, R. J., Hein, M. E. and Greiner, T. H. (1979). Experimental methane production from animal excreta in pilot-scale and farm-size units. Journal of Animal Science, 48 (1), 202-217. Stäb, J., Kuch, B., Rupp, S., Fischer, K., Kranert, M. and Metzger, J. W. (2008). Determination of organic contaminants in compost and digestates in Baden- Württemberg, South-West Germany, In Proceedings of the international congress CODIS 2008, Compost and digestate: sustainability, benefits, and impacts for the environment and for plant production, Solothurn, Switzerland. Straka , F., Jenicek, P., Zabranska, J., Dohanyos, M. and Kuncarova, M. (2007). Anaerobic fermentation of biomass and wastes with respect to sulfur and nitrogen contents in treated materials. In Proceeding of 11 th International waste management and landfill symposium, Cagliari, Italy, 1-5 October, 2007. 106
Stroot, P. G., McMahon, K. D., Mackie, R. I. and Raskin, L. (2001). Anaerobic codigestion of municipal solid waste and biosolids under various mixing conditions-I. digester performance. Water Research, 35 (7), 1804-1816. Sung, S. and Liu, T. (2003). Ammonia inhibition on thermophilic anaerobic digestion. Chemosphere, 53 (1), 43-52. Surroop, D. and Mohee, R. (2012). Technical and economic assessment of power generation from biogas. In 2012 International Conference on Environmental Science and Technology, Singapore. Suwannoppadol, S., Ho, G., and Cord-Ruwisch, R. (2011). Rapid start-up of thermophilic anaerobic digestion with the turf fraction of MSW as inoculum. Bioresource Technology, 102 (17), 7762-7767. Svensson, K., Odlare, M. and Pell, M. (2004). The fertilizing effect of compost and biogas residues from source separated household waste, The Journal of Agricultural Science, 142, 461-467. Svensson, L. M., Björnsson, L. and Mattiasson, B. (2006). Straw bed priming enhances the methane yield and speeds up the start-up of single-stage, high-solids anaerobic reactors treating plant biomass. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, 81 (11), 1729-1735. Tambone, F., Genevini, P., D'Imporzano, G. and Adani, F. (2009). Assessing amendment properties of digestate by studying the organic matter composition and the degree of biological stability during the anaerobic digestion of the organic fraction of MSW. Bioresource Technology, 100 (12), 3140-3142. Tambone, F., Scaglia, B., D'Imporzano, G., Schievano, A., Orzi, V., Salati, S. and Adani, F. (2010). Assessing amendment and fertilizing properties of digestates from anaerobic digestion through a comparative study with digested sludge and compost. Chemosphere, 81 (5), 577-583. Tchobanoglous, G., Burton F.L. and Stensel H.D. (2003). Wastewater Engineering Treatment and Reuse. Fourth edition, Tata McGraw-Hill, New Delhi. ISBN: 0-07- 049539-4. Teater, C., Yue, Z., MacLellan, J., Liu, Y. and Liao, W. (2011). Assessing solid digestate from anaerobic digestion as feedstock for ethanol production. Bioresource Technology, 102 (2), 1856-1862. Ten Brummeler, E. (2000). Full scale experience with the BIOCEL process. (2000). Water Science and Technology, 41 (3), 299-304. Tronheim (2005). Separation -optimal utilization of digestate, Nordic Bioenergy Project, Retrieved July 20, 2008 from http://www.bioenergy2005.no/downloads/Present asjoner / 26. %20oktober/1C/Lars%20Baadstorp.pdf. 107
Page 1 and 2:
DRY ANAEROBIC DIGESTION OF MUNICIPA
Page 3 and 4:
Abstract Global solid waste generat
Page 5 and 6:
2.9 Characteristics of Digestates 3
Page 7 and 8:
List of Tables Table Title Page 2.1
Page 9 and 10:
4.20 Layout of conceptual decentral
Page 11 and 12:
1.1 Background Chapter 1 Introducti
Page 13 and 14:
The specific objectives of this res
Page 15 and 16:
scale plants of the two processes i
Page 17 and 18:
acetogens play their part to run th
Page 19 and 20:
In dry anaerobic digestion, recycli
Page 21 and 22:
process is inhibited and at that po
Page 23 and 24:
eported, which increased with time,
Page 25 and 26:
acids and increased downfall of pat
Page 27 and 28:
performance of a poorly mixed (1 rp
Page 29 and 30:
conventional low-solid system at th
Page 31 and 32:
supply of the nutrients missing in
Page 33 and 34:
2.6.2 Single-stage continuous syste
Page 35 and 36:
single stage systems are DRANCO, Va
Page 37 and 38:
of the solid content around 23% TS
Page 39 and 40:
Substrate Feed TS (%) Reactor Type
Page 41 and 42:
Second is that it has a high water
Page 43 and 44:
2.9 Characteristics of Digestates D
Page 45 and 46:
For instance, Mumme et al., (2010)
Page 47 and 48:
Comparison of liquid and solid dige
Page 49 and 50:
2.10 Management Aspects of Anaerobi
Page 51 and 52:
Figure 2.11 Changing parameters dur
Page 53 and 54:
amount of anaerobic fermentation re
Page 55 and 56:
3.1 Inoculum and Simulations of Was
Page 57 and 58:
ed pump, water circulating jacket,
Page 59 and 60:
the reactor was increased from 35°
Page 61 and 62:
parts (wt/wt bas is) of digestate c
Page 63 and 64:
Sand drying bed (SDB) is simple, ea
Page 65 and 66: 3.4.4 Estimation of GHG emissions i
Page 67 and 68: d) Calculation methods i) CH4 emiss
Page 69 and 70: Table 3.5 Analytical Methods for Va
Page 71 and 72: Biogas production 100X (NmL) Specif
Page 73 and 74: (i.e. 5.2 and 3.04 respectively, pl
Page 75 and 76: getting affected with the presence
Page 77 and 78: feedstock 2 is considered as a sudd
Page 79 and 80: 8.0) at most of the above said time
Page 81 and 82: Table 4.2 Surplus Energy of ITDAR D
Page 83 and 84: VFA 100 X (mg/L) VFA/Alk ratio 200
Page 85 and 86: the VFA concentration increased to
Page 87 and 88: The increase in GPR was almost line
Page 89 and 90: Based on our results, the best oper
Page 91 and 92: Based on this property of digestate
Page 93 and 94: Table 4.5. With curing of digestate
Page 95 and 96: application (after curing) in CH 4
Page 97 and 98: digestion, etc. Moreover, mixing of
Page 99 and 100: Figure 4.20 Layout of conceptual de
Page 101 and 102: Chapter 5 Conclusions and Recommend
Page 103 and 104: 5.2 Recommendations Following are t
Page 105 and 106: References Abdullahi, Y. A., Akunna
Page 107 and 108: Cengel, Y.A. (2003). Heat Transfer
Page 109 and 110: Forster-Carneiro, T., Pérez, M., R
Page 111 and 112: Kaparaju, P., Buendia, I., Ellegaar
Page 113 and 114: Liu, C., Yuan, X., Zeng, G., Li, W.
Page 115: Paavola, T. and Rintala, J. (2008).
Page 119 and 120: Zeshan, Karthikeyan, O. P. and Visv
Page 121 and 122: Fruit and vegetable Waste Closer to
Page 123 and 124: Figure A-5 Sand drying bed for dewa
Page 125 and 126: Assumptions Size of the community:
Page 127 and 128: The flow rate of 0.569 m 3 biogas/h
Page 129 and 130: Area for 910 kg dry solids = 910 (k
Page 131 and 132: = 280 m 3 /d x 0.000717 tons/m 3 (D
Page 133 and 134: Table C-1 Operational Parameters of
Page 135 and 136: Run Time GPR % CO2 % CH4 Methane Yi
Page 137 and 138: Appendix D Data of Phase II Pilot E
Page 139 and 140: Table D-3 Characteristics of Feed a
Page 141 and 142: Methodology Methodology for for Ene
Page 143 and 144: Q = Heat transfer rate or heat loss
Page 145: Calculation of GHG Emission Potenti
show all

dry anaerobic digestion of municipal solid waste and digestate ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?