- Page 1 and 2: DRY ANAEROBIC DIGESTION OF MUNICIPA
- Page 3 and 4: Abstract Global solid waste generat
- Page 5 and 6: 2.9 Characteristics of Digestates 3
- Page 7: List of Tables Table Title Page 2.1
- Page 11 and 12: 1.1 Background Chapter 1 Introducti
- Page 13 and 14: The specific objectives of this res
- Page 15 and 16: scale plants of the two processes i
- Page 17 and 18: acetogens play their part to run th
- Page 19 and 20: In dry anaerobic digestion, recycli
- Page 21 and 22: process is inhibited and at that po
- Page 23 and 24: eported, which increased with time,
- Page 25 and 26: acids and increased downfall of pat
- Page 27 and 28: performance of a poorly mixed (1 rp
- Page 29 and 30: conventional low-solid system at th
- Page 31 and 32: supply of the nutrients missing in
- Page 33 and 34: 2.6.2 Single-stage continuous syste
- Page 35 and 36: single stage systems are DRANCO, Va
- Page 37 and 38: of the solid content around 23% TS
- Page 39 and 40: Substrate Feed TS (%) Reactor Type
- Page 41 and 42: Second is that it has a high water
- Page 43 and 44: 2.9 Characteristics of Digestates D
- Page 45 and 46: For instance, Mumme et al., (2010)
- Page 47 and 48: Comparison of liquid and solid dige
- Page 49 and 50: 2.10 Management Aspects of Anaerobi
- Page 51 and 52: Figure 2.11 Changing parameters dur
- Page 53 and 54: amount of anaerobic fermentation re
- Page 55 and 56: 3.1 Inoculum and Simulations of Was
- Page 57 and 58: ed pump, water circulating jacket,
- Page 59 and 60:
the reactor was increased from 35°
- Page 61 and 62:
parts (wt/wt bas is) of digestate c
- Page 63 and 64:
Sand drying bed (SDB) is simple, ea
- Page 65 and 66:
3.4.4 Estimation of GHG emissions i
- Page 67 and 68:
d) Calculation methods i) CH4 emiss
- Page 69 and 70:
Table 3.5 Analytical Methods for Va
- Page 71 and 72:
Biogas production 100X (NmL) Specif
- Page 73 and 74:
(i.e. 5.2 and 3.04 respectively, pl
- Page 75 and 76:
getting affected with the presence
- Page 77 and 78:
feedstock 2 is considered as a sudd
- Page 79 and 80:
8.0) at most of the above said time
- Page 81 and 82:
Table 4.2 Surplus Energy of ITDAR D
- Page 83 and 84:
VFA 100 X (mg/L) VFA/Alk ratio 200
- Page 85 and 86:
the VFA concentration increased to
- Page 87 and 88:
The increase in GPR was almost line
- Page 89 and 90:
Based on our results, the best oper
- Page 91 and 92:
Based on this property of digestate
- Page 93 and 94:
Table 4.5. With curing of digestate
- Page 95 and 96:
application (after curing) in CH 4
- Page 97 and 98:
digestion, etc. Moreover, mixing of
- Page 99 and 100:
Figure 4.20 Layout of conceptual de
- Page 101 and 102:
Chapter 5 Conclusions and Recommend
- Page 103 and 104:
5.2 Recommendations Following are t
- Page 105 and 106:
References Abdullahi, Y. A., Akunna
- Page 107 and 108:
Cengel, Y.A. (2003). Heat Transfer
- Page 109 and 110:
Forster-Carneiro, T., Pérez, M., R
- Page 111 and 112:
Kaparaju, P., Buendia, I., Ellegaar
- Page 113 and 114:
Liu, C., Yuan, X., Zeng, G., Li, W.
- Page 115 and 116:
Paavola, T. and Rintala, J. (2008).
- Page 117 and 118:
Stroot, P. G., McMahon, K. D., Mack
- Page 119 and 120:
Zeshan, Karthikeyan, O. P. and Visv
- Page 121 and 122:
Fruit and vegetable Waste Closer to
- Page 123 and 124:
Figure A-5 Sand drying bed for dewa
- Page 125 and 126:
Assumptions Size of the community:
- Page 127 and 128:
The flow rate of 0.569 m 3 biogas/h
- Page 129 and 130:
Area for 910 kg dry solids = 910 (k
- Page 131 and 132:
= 280 m 3 /d x 0.000717 tons/m 3 (D
- Page 133 and 134:
Table C-1 Operational Parameters of
- Page 135 and 136:
Run Time GPR % CO2 % CH4 Methane Yi
- Page 137 and 138:
Appendix D Data of Phase II Pilot E
- Page 139 and 140:
Table D-3 Characteristics of Feed a
- Page 141 and 142:
Methodology Methodology for for Ene
- Page 143 and 144:
Q = Heat transfer rate or heat loss
- Page 145:
Calculation of GHG Emission Potenti