dry anaerobic digestion of municipal solid waste and digestate ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Appendix C Data <strong>of</strong> Phase I Pilot Experiment 122
Table C-1 Operational Parameters <strong>of</strong> Anaerobic Digestion During Phase I Pilot Experiment Run Time pH VFA Alkalinity VFA/Alk ratio TAN (day) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) 1 5.43 49130 23450 2.10 1766 2 6 5.98 35640 27360 1.30 1928 7 13 6.92 28800 35000 0.82 2134 65 18 6.68 37930 28860 1.31 2600 46 24 7.14 34250 28800 1.19 2480 123 29 6.9 37750 28860 1.31 2990 87 35 7.12 33750 32850 1.03 2940 139 41 7.61 30900 65500 0.47 3206 427 47 7.48 28500 52700 0.54 3115 318 53 7.39 26500 48450 0.55 2944 249 56 7.53 25250 49050 0.51 2947 334 63 7.49 24000 46350 0.52 2986 312 70 7.41 19125 38950 0.49 2811 248 77 7.40 20000 37400 0.53 2779 240 83 7.36 20750 36000 0.58 2912 232 91 7.70 15500 31350 0.49 2618 416 98 7.59 14750 32000 0.46 2233 286 105 7.45 13750 28500 0.48 2205 212 119 7.71 12750 33750 0.38 2566 416 127 7.75 10750 35250 0.30 2352 411 133 7.82 11100 44400 0.25 2436 486 141 8.00 10750 68750 0.16 2400 657 147 7.78 11250 36250 0.31 2200 407 154 7.45 11250 35100 0.32 1862 179 160 7.44 10500 33600 0.31 1883 177 168 7.30 12500 30450 0.41 1939 136 175 7.51 12000 30250 0.40 2114 230 182 7.35 10750 30250 0.36 2163 168 187 7.72 10000 27025 0.37 2254 372 196 7.47 8750 22425 0.39 2310 231 203 7.31 8375 19425 0.43 2086 149 210 7.49 7875 19800 0.40 2037 213 217 7.33 8375 19000 0.44 1897 141 224 7.41 7800 19250 0.41 1820 161 233 7.84 6700 22650 0.30 1850 383 240 7.55 7000 16500 0.42 1680 198 246 7.50 5150 15062 0.34 1708 182 253 7.25 8150 11700 0.70 1512 95 261 7.00 5750 7700 0.75 1897 69 264 7.37 5500 9100 0.60 2135 173 271 7.47 5500 14000 0.39 1540 154 123 Free Ammonia (mg/L)
Page 1 and 2:
DRY ANAEROBIC DIGESTION OF MUNICIPA
Page 3 and 4:
Abstract Global solid waste generat
Page 5 and 6:
2.9 Characteristics of Digestates 3
Page 7 and 8:
List of Tables Table Title Page 2.1
Page 9 and 10:
4.20 Layout of conceptual decentral
Page 11 and 12:
1.1 Background Chapter 1 Introducti
Page 13 and 14:
The specific objectives of this res
Page 15 and 16:
scale plants of the two processes i
Page 17 and 18:
acetogens play their part to run th
Page 19 and 20:
In dry anaerobic digestion, recycli
Page 21 and 22:
process is inhibited and at that po
Page 23 and 24:
eported, which increased with time,
Page 25 and 26:
acids and increased downfall of pat
Page 27 and 28:
performance of a poorly mixed (1 rp
Page 29 and 30:
conventional low-solid system at th
Page 31 and 32:
supply of the nutrients missing in
Page 33 and 34:
2.6.2 Single-stage continuous syste
Page 35 and 36:
single stage systems are DRANCO, Va
Page 37 and 38:
of the solid content around 23% TS
Page 39 and 40:
Substrate Feed TS (%) Reactor Type
Page 41 and 42:
Second is that it has a high water
Page 43 and 44:
2.9 Characteristics of Digestates D
Page 45 and 46:
For instance, Mumme et al., (2010)
Page 47 and 48:
Comparison of liquid and solid dige
Page 49 and 50:
2.10 Management Aspects of Anaerobi
Page 51 and 52:
Figure 2.11 Changing parameters dur
Page 53 and 54:
amount of anaerobic fermentation re
Page 55 and 56:
3.1 Inoculum and Simulations of Was
Page 57 and 58:
ed pump, water circulating jacket,
Page 59 and 60:
the reactor was increased from 35°
Page 61 and 62:
parts (wt/wt bas is) of digestate c
Page 63 and 64:
Sand drying bed (SDB) is simple, ea
Page 65 and 66:
3.4.4 Estimation of GHG emissions i
Page 67 and 68:
d) Calculation methods i) CH4 emiss
Page 69 and 70:
Table 3.5 Analytical Methods for Va
Page 71 and 72:
Biogas production 100X (NmL) Specif
Page 73 and 74:
(i.e. 5.2 and 3.04 respectively, pl
Page 75 and 76:
getting affected with the presence
Page 77 and 78:
feedstock 2 is considered as a sudd
Page 79 and 80:
8.0) at most of the above said time
Page 81 and 82: Table 4.2 Surplus Energy of ITDAR D
Page 83 and 84: VFA 100 X (mg/L) VFA/Alk ratio 200
Page 85 and 86: the VFA concentration increased to
Page 87 and 88: The increase in GPR was almost line
Page 89 and 90: Based on our results, the best oper
Page 91 and 92: Based on this property of digestate
Page 93 and 94: Table 4.5. With curing of digestate
Page 95 and 96: application (after curing) in CH 4
Page 97 and 98: digestion, etc. Moreover, mixing of
Page 99 and 100: Figure 4.20 Layout of conceptual de
Page 101 and 102: Chapter 5 Conclusions and Recommend
Page 103 and 104: 5.2 Recommendations Following are t
Page 105 and 106: References Abdullahi, Y. A., Akunna
Page 107 and 108: Cengel, Y.A. (2003). Heat Transfer
Page 109 and 110: Forster-Carneiro, T., Pérez, M., R
Page 111 and 112: Kaparaju, P., Buendia, I., Ellegaar
Page 113 and 114: Liu, C., Yuan, X., Zeng, G., Li, W.
Page 115 and 116: Paavola, T. and Rintala, J. (2008).
Page 117 and 118: Stroot, P. G., McMahon, K. D., Mack
Page 119 and 120: Zeshan, Karthikeyan, O. P. and Visv
Page 121 and 122: Fruit and vegetable Waste Closer to
Page 123 and 124: Figure A-5 Sand drying bed for dewa
Page 125 and 126: Assumptions Size of the community:
Page 127 and 128: The flow rate of 0.569 m 3 biogas/h
Page 129 and 130: Area for 910 kg dry solids = 910 (k
Page 131: = 280 m 3 /d x 0.000717 tons/m 3 (D
Page 135 and 136: Run Time GPR % CO2 % CH4 Methane Yi
Page 137 and 138: Appendix D Data of Phase II Pilot E
Page 139 and 140: Table D-3 Characteristics of Feed a
Page 141 and 142: Methodology Methodology for for Ene
Page 143 and 144: Q = Heat transfer rate or heat loss
Page 145: Calculation of GHG Emission Potenti
show all

dry anaerobic digestion of municipal solid waste and digestate ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?