05.10.2013 Views

Download - FDCL

Download - FDCL

Download - FDCL

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5.3 The EU-MERCOSUR association agreement: The deregulation of national<br />

markets through the regulation of international markets?<br />

The EU and MERCOSUR, after the “failure” of Cancún, have repeatedly emphasized<br />

their interest in finalizing an “Interregional Association Agreement”. A conclusion<br />

to this agreement – with the “ambitious and innovative provisions” of the so-called<br />

“fourth generation” – will now, after the EU-Mexico and EU-Chile agreements, be attempted<br />

within the EU-MERCOSUR context in the course of the coming months.<br />

Following the last EU-MERCOSUR ministerial meeting in Brussels on November<br />

12, 2003 the negotiation plan of the coming sessions of the bi-regional negotiation<br />

committee (BNC) was tightened, so that the treaty will be prepared for the final consultations<br />

at the next meeting of the heads of state of Latin America, the Caribbean<br />

and Europe from May 28-29 at Guadalajara, Mexico, and could be signed, according<br />

to the plan, in October 2004.<br />

The issue of investment will play a central role here, which will have to be<br />

matched by the pretensions of the European Commission, which untiringly praises<br />

the compatibility of trade and investment with development. But so far the focus of<br />

the EU-MERCOSUR negotiation process seems to have favored trade and investment,<br />

so that the warning of the assessment expressed by civil society already in<br />

2002 continues to be valid:<br />

“It is time to rethink the process of international investment agreements thoroughly.<br />

In particular the relationship between bilateral investment agreements<br />

and multilateral or interregional agreements needs to be articulated much<br />

more carefully and explicitly than has happened to date. That does not appear<br />

to be happening within the EU/MERCOSUR process.” 331<br />

It not only has to be feared that, within the framework of the broad free trade<br />

agenda between the EU and MERCOSUR questions of development will become<br />

secondary just like the verbal avowals for human rights, but also that national scope<br />

of decision making with respect to development will be subjected to the dictum of<br />

profit and efficiency by means of the<br />

a) Proposed free trade agreement.<br />

b) Bilateral investment treaties (BITs) with their far-reaching investors’ rights, which<br />

have already been ratified or are near to ratification.<br />

331 Konrad von Moltke (International Institute for Sustainable Development): European Union / MERCOSUR<br />

Negotiations. The Environment and Sustainable Development Dimension, edited by: WWF European Policy Office,<br />

Belgium & WWF Brazil, April 2002, p. 23.<br />

119

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!