Download - FDCL
Download - FDCL
Download - FDCL
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
36<br />
mestic market and thereby would be able to give impulses to promote development.<br />
Especially during the last years, and particularly under the pressure of the requirements<br />
that IMF has placed on debtor countries, the highly indebted Latin American<br />
countries have seen themselves in the macroeconomic obligation to realize exportsurpluses,<br />
so that inflowing foreign currency has to be largely targeted towards exports.<br />
With regards to Brazil or Argentina, for example, the following macroeconomic<br />
image can be drawn: Foreign direct investment increasingly brought foreign currency<br />
into the country during the nineties, but this direct investment will, on the one hand,<br />
lead to faster outflow of profits: Even though a direct investment in the short term<br />
has a positive influence on the balance of payments, in the long run it has the disadvantage<br />
of creating capital outflows. On the other hand, this direct investment will<br />
not create further foreign currency inflows, as it is predominantly focused on the domestic<br />
market – which for both countries is especially problematic considering their<br />
high foreign debt and in this respect cannot contribute to macroeconomic stabilization<br />
against potential financial crises. Additionally, even though the by far largest part<br />
of this direct investment is directed towards the domestic market, it is particularly<br />
concentrated in the area of services like telecommunications and banking: How can<br />
such direct investment, which is targeted at the domestic market, then have the ability<br />
to promote regional development? Argentina and Brazil are confronted with the<br />
dilemma of having to attract direct investment in order to pay off their debts and to<br />
maintain good balance of payments– and on the other hand, trying to use this foreign<br />
capital in a way which is productive for regional development, i.e., directed towards<br />
the domestic market. Whether the telecommunications and banking sectors can be<br />
regarded as especially productive in this sense, can be seriously doubted.<br />
Furthermore, it is not quite understandable why one should expect a drive for<br />
(sustainable) development from investors, who function according to the market<br />
laws of profit and performance, cost reduction and ousting of the competition.<br />
Since it is not expected from the market participants that the investments undertaken<br />
be directly utilized for socially and environmentally friendly development, the<br />
indirect connections of the neoliberal development theories are used to support the<br />
argumentation that: According to this development-model the decisive agent is not<br />
the state, but the free forces of the deregulated market which will with the “invisible<br />
hand” bring about the promotion of development.<br />
Worldwide countries adhere to this strong belief in the market, that foreign investment<br />
will lead to development: there is increasing competition between states<br />
for foreign investment, which is expressed in national, regional and local programs<br />
for the promotion of FDI, i.e., in preferential tax treatment for private foreign investors.<br />
It should be mentioned here that – even thinking in terms of market-rules-