- Page 2 and 3: Christian Russau Enforcement of int
- Page 4 and 5: Preface Since the end of 1999 the C
- Page 6 and 7: If the “Interregional Association
- Page 10 and 11: 10 1.1 Negotiations of the “Inter
- Page 12 and 13: 12 A similar agreement of the so-ca
- Page 14 and 15: 14 tute in the eyes of many countri
- Page 16 and 17: 16 amaraty, where the FTAA-negotiat
- Page 18 and 19: 18 free trade agreement between the
- Page 20 and 21: 20 at the UN Millenium Summit to ha
- Page 22 and 23: 22 on the possibility of a unilater
- Page 24 and 25: 24 tual contradictions between the
- Page 26 and 27: 26 fired. The workers union OGB-L,
- Page 28 and 29: 28 policy and EU development policy
- Page 31 and 32: Chapter 2: Foreign direct investmen
- Page 33 and 34: 50% in 2002 as compared to the prev
- Page 35 and 36: The reasons for propagating this co
- Page 37 and 38: • according to a study conducted
- Page 39 and 40: promotion of domestic demand, in or
- Page 41 and 42: 2.2 International Agreements and Tr
- Page 43 and 44: 2.3 The World Trade Organization WT
- Page 45 and 46: • trade and investment • compet
- Page 47 and 48: 2.3.3 The GATS agreement The Genera
- Page 49 and 50: which works on a profit-basis, sees
- Page 51 and 52: “deadline: by 1 January 2005”.
- Page 53 and 54: “discrimination” or “expropri
- Page 55: Stockholm Chamber of Commerce (SCC)
- Page 58 and 59:
58 3.1 European foreign investment
- Page 60 and 61:
60 zations and liberalization in La
- Page 62 and 63:
62 the profitability, on the electr
- Page 64 and 65:
64 America. Also the issue of human
- Page 66 and 67:
66 • Thirdly the WTO Dispute Sett
- Page 68 and 69:
68 to the U.S. trade power by rapid
- Page 70 and 71:
70 The largest trade balance defici
- Page 72 and 73:
72 OECD area by European companies.
- Page 74 and 75:
74 EDF, has issued a similar compla
- Page 76 and 77:
76 European automobile producers in
- Page 78 and 79:
78 But not only international law o
- Page 80 and 81:
80 ment,” which in the beginning
- Page 82 and 83:
82 4. 1 The free trade agreement be
- Page 84 and 85:
84 issues for us.” 233 On the oth
- Page 86 and 87:
86 capital flows” explicitly. The
- Page 88 and 89:
88 which also speaks out against th
- Page 90 and 91:
90 in Congress and encouraged the B
- Page 92 and 93:
92 studies in 2003 on the impact of
- Page 94 and 95:
94 The MEBF successfully works as a
- Page 96 and 97:
96 “We have tried to explain how
- Page 98 and 99:
98 4.2 The example of Brazil: Forei
- Page 100 and 101:
100 Brazilian Constitution. This wo
- Page 102 and 103:
102 countries through CC-5 accounts
- Page 104 and 105:
104 4.3 Brazil, foreign direct inve
- Page 106 and 107:
106 “Commercial Presence: The jur
- Page 108 and 109:
108 Providing cheaper access to wat
- Page 110 and 111:
110
- Page 112 and 113:
112 5.1 Foreign direct investment i
- Page 114 and 115:
114 The agreement on government pro
- Page 116 and 117:
116 5.2 The case of Chile: Foreign
- Page 118 and 119:
118 which was believed to be dead,
- Page 120 and 121:
120 c) The still pending Doha “De
- Page 122 and 123:
122 gesamtamerikanischen Freihandel
- Page 124 and 125:
124 · http://europa.eu.int/comm/co
- Page 126 and 127:
126 · http://www.citizen.org/ · h
- Page 128 and 129:
128 · http://www.rebrip.org.br ·
- Page 130 and 131:
130 um den Markt der wiederentdeckt
- Page 132 and 133:
132 · Torrent, Ramón: Acordos Int
- Page 134 and 135:
134 DIHK Deutscher Industrie- und H
- Page 136 and 137:
136 Lomé Lomé-Agreement between E
- Page 138 and 139:
About FDCL is a nonprofitorganizati