05.10.2013 Views

Download - FDCL

Download - FDCL

Download - FDCL

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

50<br />

2.3.4 The Relationships of “Trade and Investment”<br />

Since 1996 there have been working-committees within the WTO who have<br />

been debating the issues pertaining to “trade and investment.” 103 The objective of<br />

these committees is to elaborate and pass a multilateral framework agreement,<br />

which should establish rules on investment in all its facets for all WTO member<br />

states. The aims of the so-called Doha Agenda for the area of “trade and investment”<br />

range from identifying the comprehensive scope of application and definition<br />

of the term investment, of transparency, of non-discrimination, of the MFN and NT<br />

clauses, of rules for “pre-establishment” on the basis of GATS-definitions, to positive-sector<br />

lists, concessions on development-issues, as well as defined exceptions<br />

and predetermined safeguard clauses for balance of payment crises, as well as a<br />

dispute-settlement mechanism. 104<br />

In November 2001 the 4th Ministerial Conference of the WTO in Doha, Qatar,<br />

decided that negotiations on a<br />

“multilateral framework to secure transparent, stable and predictable conditions<br />

for long-term cross-border investment, particularly foreign direct investment”<br />

(§20 Ministerial Declaration, 14.11.2001, Doha 105 )<br />

should only be initiated on the basis of a consensual decision on the modalities<br />

of negotiations which were to be treated at the 5th Ministerial Conference in Cancún<br />

from September 10-14, 2003:<br />

“[W]e agree that negotiations will take place after the Fifth Session of the<br />

Ministerial Conference on the basis of a decision to be taken, by explicit consensus,<br />

at that session on modalities of negotiation.” (ibid.).<br />

First the “modalities of negotiations” were to be defined “by explicit consensus”<br />

and after Cancún the negotiations could have started.<br />

According to the chairman of the Ministerial Conference the formulation “by explicit<br />

consensus” left a wide margin not only to debate “how” to negotiate, but also<br />

to pose the general question if negotiations should take place at all. Nevertheless,<br />

the Ministerial Declaration defined the establishment and desired conclusion of the<br />

negotiations as having already been determined, since the deadline for the conclusion<br />

of the negotiation round on investment had already been set by them to be:<br />

103 http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/invest_e/invest_e.htm.<br />

104 http://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/minist_e/min01_e/mindecl_e.htm#relationship.<br />

105 http://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/minist_e/min01_e/mindecl_e.htm.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!