Analysis of the Vehicle Inventory and Use Survey for Trucks ... - About

More documents

Recommendations

Info

VEHICLE TYPE:3+2 MAXIMUM PAYLOAD LOW BOY PLATFORM BASIC PLATFORM % 100 80 60 40 20 CUMULATIVE PERCENTAGE CURVE Sample Size = 46 Pop. n.=2,614 Pop. Mean = 40.88 kips Pop. Std. Dev. = 18.55 kips 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Maximum Payload [kips] BASIC ENCLOSED VAN POLE LOGGING TRUCK % 100 80 60 40 20 CUMULATIVE PERCENTAGE CURVE Sample Size = 16 Pop. n.= 236 Pop. Mean = 43.88 kips Pop. Std. Dev. = 11.35 kips 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Maximum Payload [kips] % % 100 80 60 40 20 CUMULATIVE PERCENTAGE CURVE Sample Size = 123 Pop. n.= 4,644 Pop. Mean = 42.69 kips Pop. Std. Dev. = 14.11 kips 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Maximum Payload [kips] 100 80 60 40 20 CUMULATIVE PERCENTAGE CURVE Sample Size = 84 Pop. n.=2,985 Pop. Mean = 52.73 kips Pop. Std. Dev. = 6.51 kips 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Maximum Payload [kips] GRAIN BODIES DUMP TRUCK TANK TRUCK FOR LIQUIDS OR GASES % 100 80 60 40 20 CUMULATIVE PERCENTAGE CURVE Sample Size = 48 Pop. n.= 2,003 Pop. Mean = 50.15 kips Pop. Std. Dev. = 5.49 kips 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Maximum Payload [kips] % 100 80 60 40 20 CUMULATIVE PERCENTAGE CURVE Sample Size = 305 Pop. n.= 10,921 Pop. Mean = 38.81 kips Pop. Std. Dev. = 13.33 kips 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Maximum Payload [kips] % 100 80 60 40 20 CUMULATIVE PERCENTAGE CURVE 1997 FLEET Sample Size = 64 Pop. n.=2,908 Pop. Mean = 50.87 kips Pop. Std. Dev. = 5.49 kips 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Maximum Payload [kips]
VEHICLE TYPE: 3-S2 MAXIMUM PAYLOAD LOW BOY PLATFORM BASIC PLATFORM LIVESTOCK % 100 80 60 40 20 CUMULATIVE PERCENTAGE CURVE 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Maximum Payload [kips] INSULATED NON-REFRIGERATED INSULATED REFRIGERATED DROP FRAME VAN % BASIC ENCLOSED VAN POLE LOGGING TRUCK AUTOMOBILE TRANSPORT % 100 80 60 40 20 CUMULATIVE PERCENTAGE CURVE GRAIN BODIES DUMP TRUCK TANK TRUCK FOR LIGUID OR GASES % TANK TRUCK FOR DRY BULK % Sample Size = 796 Pop. n.= 34,812 Pop. Mean = 46.31 kips Pop. Std. Dev. = 14.64 kips Sample Size = 327 Pop. n.= 15,814 Pop. Mean = 47.04 kips Pop. Std. Dev. = 4.96 kips 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Maximum Payload [kips] 100 80 60 40 20 CUMULATIVE PERCENTAGE CURVE 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Maximum Payload [kips] 100 80 60 40 20 CUMULATIVE PERCENTAGE CURVE Sample Size =4,127 Pop. n.= 254,971 Pop. Mean = 46.58 kips Pop. Std. Dev. = 8.28 kips 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Maximum Payload [kips] 100 80 60 40 20 CUMULATIVE PERCENTAGE CURVE Sample Size = 920 Pop. n.= 40,229 Pop. Mean = 51.58 kips Pop. Std. Dev. = 6.08 kips Sample Size = 320 Pop. n.= 17,998 Pop. Mean = 50.51 kips Pop. Std. Dev. = 6.67 kips 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Maximum Payload [kips] % % % % 100 80 60 40 20 CUMULATIVE PERCENTAGE CURVE Sample Size = 2,437 Pop. n.= 121,648 Pop. Mean = 48.02 kips Pop. Std. Dev. = 8.27 kips 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Maximum Payload [kips] 100 80 60 40 20 CUMULATIVE PERCENTAGE CURVE Sample Size = 1,848 Pop. n.= 101,196 Pop. Mean = 45.43 kips Pop. Std. Dev. = 5.19 kips 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Maximum Payload [kips] 100 80 60 40 20 CUMULATIVE PERCENTAGE CURVE Sample Size = 495 Pop. n.= 21,866 Pop. Mean = 52.26 kips Pop. Std. Dev. = 6.02 kips 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Maximum Payload [kips] 100 80 60 40 20 CUMULATIVE PERCENTAGE CURVE Sample Size = 1,112 Pop. n.= 50,720 Pop. Mean = 47.53 kips Pop. Std. Dev. = 7.73 kips 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Maximum Payload [kips] % % % % 100 80 60 40 20 CUMULATIVE PERCENTAGE CURVE 1997 FLEET Sample Size = 234 Pop. n.= 8,995 Pop. Mean = 48.12 kips Pop. Std. Dev. = 6.41 kips 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Maximum Payload [kips] 100 80 60 40 20 CUMULATIVE PERCENTAGE CURVE Sample Size = 251 Pop. n.= 12,778 Pop. Mean = 36.23 kips Pop. Std. Dev. = 10.88 kips 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Maximum Payload [kips] 100 100 80 60 40 20 80 60 40 20 CUMULATIVE PERCENTAGE CURVE Sample Size = 122 Pop. n.= 7,787 Pop. Mean = 39.01 kips Pop. Std. Dev. = 8.14 kips 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Maximum Payload [kips] CUMULATIVE PERCENTAGE CURVE Sample Size = 1,116 Pop. n.= 58,140 Pop. Mean = 49.34 kips Pop. Std. Dev. = 7.97 kips 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Maximum Payload [kips]
Page 1 and 2:
Federal Highway Administration Offi
Page 3 and 4:
The primary objectives of this repo
Page 5 and 6:
# Survey and population estimates a
Page 7 and 8:
# Tank truck, liquids or gas # Othe
Page 9 and 10:
TABLE ES-1 1992 U.S. COMMERCIAL FRE
Page 11 and 12:
Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction
Page 13 and 14:
List of Tables Table 2.1-1 The 5 Ma
Page 15 and 16:
1.0 Introduction 1.1 Purpose and Sc
Page 17 and 18:
Small Sample Size. In general, read
Page 19 and 20:
Table 2.1-1 The 5 Major Vehicle Con
Page 21 and 22:
Figure 2.2-1 Vehicle Group Descript
Page 23 and 24:
7) Doubles @ 6 + Axles 8) Triples (
Page 25 and 26:
3.0 Analysis of the Distribution of
Page 27 and 28:
Table 3.2-1 1997 Total Truck Fleet
Page 29 and 30:
3.4 Size of the 5-Axles or More Fle
Page 31 and 32:
Number of Vehicles 1,400,000 1,300,
Page 33 and 34:
Table 3.4-2 1997 Truck Fleet (@ 5-a
Page 35 and 36:
# California has the largest state
Page 37 and 38:
Table 3.5-1 Truck Fleet (@ 5-axles
Page 39 and 40:
% of Fleet 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30
Page 41 and 42:
# 8 vehicle groups (see Section 2.2
Page 43 and 44:
Truck Fleet (5-axles or more) Numbe
Page 45 and 46:
Other Grain Bodies Tank Truck, Liqu
Page 47 and 48:
Number of Vehicles 1,400,000 1,200,
Page 49 and 50:
- household moving and office furni
Page 51 and 52:
# For all truck + trailer combinati
Page 53 and 54:
6.0 Analysis of the 5-Axles or More
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
# For the 3-S2 group, - One-fifth o
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
7.0 Analysis of Weights, Dimensions
Page 63 and 64:
7.2 Observations on Specific Truck
Page 65 and 66:
# (3 + 2) Basic Enclosed Van [pop =
Page 67 and 68:
- Annual VMT—mixed. # (3-S2) Insu
Page 69 and 70:
- half (40-60%) operate mostly (80-
Page 71 and 72:
# (3-S3) Tank Trucks for Liquids or
Page 73 and 74:
Body Type Low Boy Platform Basic Pl
Page 75 and 76:
Body Type Low Boy Platform Basic Pl
Page 77 and 78:
There has been a substantial increa
Page 79 and 80:
3-S2 Basic Enc. Van 3-S2 Refrigerat
Page 81 and 82:
7.5.2 Changes in Truck Lengths by 1
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
7.5.3 Changes in Truck Weights # ME
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Table 7.5.3-2 Comparison of Mean "A
Page 91 and 92:
Average Weight (lbs) 80,000 70,000
Page 93 and 94:
Comparison of Mean Maximum Payload
Page 95 and 96:
Comparison of Mean "Average" Payloa
Page 97 and 98:
8.0 Analysis of Vehicle Miles of Tr
Page 99 and 100:
CHANGES BETWEEN 1992 AND 1997 Figur
Page 101 and 102:
Mean VMT 100,000 90,000 80,000 70,0
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Appendix A Regional Distributions o
Page 107 and 108:
1997 Truck Fleet Traffic Region: No
Page 109 and 110:
1997 Truck Fleet Traffic Region: So
Page 111 and 112:
Appendix B Regional Distributions o
Page 113 and 114:
Not to Scale Truck + Trailer @ 6 or
Page 115 and 116:
Not to Scale $ $ Tridem Axle Tracto
Page 117 and 118:
2-S1-2 STAA Tractor + Double Traile
Page 119 and 120:
Not to Scale $ $ $ $ $ $ Base Scale
Page 121 and 122:
1997 Truck Fleet (@ 5-axles or more
Page 123 and 124:
1997 Truck Fleet (@ 5-axles or more
Page 125 and 126:
Appendix C Detailed Body Type Analy
Page 127 and 128: Appendix C 1997 Truck Fleet (@ 5-ax
Page 133 and 134: 1997 Truck Fleet (@ 5-axles or more
Page 139 and 140: Appendix E Weights, Dimensions, and
Page 141 and 142: VEHICLE TYPE: 3-S2 BODY TYPE: LOW B
Page 143 and 144: VEHICLE TYPE: 3-S2 BODY TYPE: LIVES
Page 145 and 146: VEHICLE TYPE: 3-S2 BODY TYPE: INSUL
Page 147 and 148: VEHICLE TYPE: 3-S2 BODY TYPE: BASIC
Page 149 and 150: VEHICLE TYPE: 3-S2 BODY TYPE: AUTOM
Page 151 and 152: VEHICLE TYPE: 3-S2 BODY TYPE: DUMP
Page 153 and 154: VEHICLE TYPE: 3-S2 BODY TYPE:TANK T
Page 155 and 156: VEHICLE TYPE: 3+2 BODY TYPE: BASIC
Page 157 and 158: VEHICLE TYPE: 3+2 BODY TYPE: POLE L
Page 159 and 160: VEHICLE TYPE: 3+2 BODY TYPE: DUMP T
Page 161 and 162: VEHICLE TYPE: 3-S3 BODY TYPE: LOW B
Page 163 and 164: VEHICLE TYPE: 3-S3 BODY TYPE: INSUL
Page 165 and 166: VEHICLE TYPE: 3-S3 BODY TYPE: POLE
Page 167 and 168: VEHICLE TYPE: 3-S3 BODY TYPE: DUMP
Page 169 and 170: VEHICLE TYPE: 2-S1-2 BODY TYPE: BAS
Page 171 and 172: VEHICLE TYPE: 2-S1-2 BODY TYPE: BAS
Page 173 and 174: Appendix F Average Payload Weights
Page 175 and 176: VEHICLE TYPE: 3-S2 AVERAGE PAYLOAD
Page 177: VEHICLE TYPE: STAA (2-S1-2) AVERAGE
Page 181 and 182: VEHICLE TYPE: STAA (2-S1-2) MAXIMUM
Page 183 and 184: Regional Comparison of Mean Tare (E
Page 185 and 186: Regional Comparison of Mean Average
Page 187 and 188: Regional Comparison of Percent of T
Page 189 and 190: Regional Comparison of Percent of T
Page 191 and 192: Regional Comparison of the Mean Ann
Page 193 and 194: Regional Comparison of the Percent
Page 195 and 196: Appendix H Data Analysis Methodolog
Page 197 and 198: Configuration AXLRE Code 1997 4-S1
Page 199 and 200: Vehicle Body Type VIUS Variables of
Page 201 and 202: Major Body Type Groups and their As
Page 203 and 204: Since the analysis was focused on t
Page 205 and 206: Industrial "waste" water Hazardous
Page 207 and 208: Simple Statistics In this analysis,
Page 209 and 210: PRNPRO 164-165 WANNMIL 166-178 VG 1
Page 211 and 212: Proc GLM data=dataset name; Class V
Page 213 and 214: RUN; H - 19
Page 215 and 216: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE BUREAU
Page 217 and 218: ITEM 5 Which best describes this ve
Page 219 and 220: ITEM 11 What type of cab does this
Page 221 and 222: ITEM 18 What percent of 1997 mileag
Page 223 and 224: . ITEM 27 Which of the following be
Page 225: ITEM 29 a. At any time during 1997
show all

Analysis of the Vehicle Inventory and Use Survey for Trucks ... - About

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?