Analysis of the Vehicle Inventory and Use Survey for Trucks ... - About

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Comparison of Percentage of Truck Fleet With Trailer Widths of 96" and 102" by Vehicle Class/Body Type Combination (Rounded to nearest 5%) Table 7.5.1-1 Vehicle Type 3+2 3-S2 3-S3 2-S1-2 Body Type 1997 1992 1987 1997 1992 1987 1997 1992 1987 1997 1992 1987 Low Boy Platform 85% 96" 15% 102" 75% 96" 15% 102" 90% 96" 5% 102" 60% 96" 35% 102" 80% 96" 20% 102" 80% 96" 10% 102" 40% 96" 50% 102" 60% 96" 30% 102" 85% 96" 10% 102" * * * Basic Platform 75% 96" 20% 102" 90% 96" 5% 102" 65% 96" 5% 102" 70% 96" 30% 102" 80% 96" 20% 102" 85% 96" 10% 102" 65% 96" 30% 102" 75% 96" 20% 102" 90% 96" 5% 102" 85% 96" 10% 102" 85% 96" 15% 102" 80% 96" 15% 102" Livestock Truck * * * 40% 96" 60% 102" 65% 96" 35% 102" 70% 96" 20% 102" * * * * * * Insulated Non- 20% 96" 40% 96" 55% 96" Refrigerated * * * 80% 102" 60% 102" 45% 102" * * * * * * Insulated 25% 96" 45% 96" 60% 96" 25% 96" 80% 96" 55% 96" Refrigerated * * * 75% 102" 55% 102" 35% 102" 70% 102" 20% 102" 45% 102" * * * Drop Frame Van * * * 20% 96" 80% 102" 35% 96" 65% 102" 50% 96" 45% 102" * * * 0% 96" 100% 102" 20% 96" 80% 102" 30% 96" 70% 102" Basic Enclosed Van 60% 96" 40% 102" 40% 96" 60% 102" 80% 96" 20% 102" 25% 96" 70% 102" 35% 96" 65% 102" 55% 96" 40% 102" 70% 96" 30% 102" 40% 96" 60% 102" 60% 96" 35% 102" 5% 96" 95% 102" 10% 96" 90% 102" 20% 96" 80% 102" Pole and Logging 80% 96" 70% 96" 95% 96" 80% 96" 90% 96" 85% 96" 50% 96" 60% 96" 70% 96" Truck 20% 102" 30% 102" 20% 102" 10% 102" 5% 102" 45% 102" 40% 102" 25% 102" * * * Automobile 85% 96" 25% 96" 80% 96" Transporter * * * 10% 102" 75% 102" 10% 102" * * * * * * Grain Body 90% 96" 5% 102" 85% 96" 10% 102" 95% 96" 30% 96" 70% 102" 90% 96" 10% 102" 80% 96" 5% 102" 85% 96" 10% 102" 95% 96" 5% 102" 95% 96" 100% 96" 0% 102" 90% 96" 10% 102" 85% 96" Dump Truck 80% 96" 15% 102" 90% 96" 5% 102" 80% 96" 85% 96" 10% 102" 90% 96" 10% 102" 80% 96" 5% 102" 80% 96" 15% 102" 90% 96" 10% 102" 80% 96" 5% 102" * * * Tank Truck For 80% 96" 95% 96" 90% 96" 80% 96" 90% 96" 80% 96" 90% 96" 85% 96" 84% 96" Liquids or Gas 20% 102" 5% 102" 15% 102" 10% 102" 5% 102" 10% 102" 10% 102" 5% 102" * * * Tank Truck For Dry 85% 96" 95% 96" 80% 96" Bulk Source: Appendix G * * * 10% 102" 5% 102" 10% 102" * * * * * * * Indicates very small sample size for the cell Note: Total percentage for a year may not add to 100% because two additional categories in the survey question, > 102" or Other
3-S2 Basic Enc. Van 3-S2 Refrigerated Van 3-S2 Drop Frame Van 2-S1-2 Basic Enc. Van 3-S2 Basic Platform 3-S2 Low Boy 3-S3 Low Boy 3-S2 Tank (liq/gas) 3-S2 Dump Truck 3-S2 Tank (dry bulk) 3+2 Dump Truck 3-S2 Grain Body 3-S2 Pole or Logging 3-S2 Auto Transport Figure 7.5.1-1 Percent of Trucks with Trailer Widths of 102 Inches or More by Vehicle Class/Body Type Combination 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Percent of Trucks 1997 1992 1987
Page 1 and 2:
Federal Highway Administration Offi
Page 3 and 4:
The primary objectives of this repo
Page 5 and 6:
# Survey and population estimates a
Page 7 and 8:
# Tank truck, liquids or gas # Othe
Page 9 and 10:
TABLE ES-1 1992 U.S. COMMERCIAL FRE
Page 11 and 12:
Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction
Page 13 and 14:
List of Tables Table 2.1-1 The 5 Ma
Page 15 and 16:
1.0 Introduction 1.1 Purpose and Sc
Page 17 and 18:
Small Sample Size. In general, read
Page 19 and 20:
Table 2.1-1 The 5 Major Vehicle Con
Page 21 and 22:
Figure 2.2-1 Vehicle Group Descript
Page 23 and 24:
7) Doubles @ 6 + Axles 8) Triples (
Page 25 and 26:
3.0 Analysis of the Distribution of
Page 27 and 28: Table 3.2-1 1997 Total Truck Fleet
Page 29 and 30: 3.4 Size of the 5-Axles or More Fle
Page 31 and 32: Number of Vehicles 1,400,000 1,300,
Page 33 and 34: Table 3.4-2 1997 Truck Fleet (@ 5-a
Page 35 and 36: # California has the largest state
Page 37 and 38: Table 3.5-1 Truck Fleet (@ 5-axles
Page 39 and 40: % of Fleet 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30
Page 41 and 42: # 8 vehicle groups (see Section 2.2
Page 43 and 44: Truck Fleet (5-axles or more) Numbe
Page 45 and 46: Other Grain Bodies Tank Truck, Liqu
Page 47 and 48: Number of Vehicles 1,400,000 1,200,
Page 49 and 50: - household moving and office furni
Page 51 and 52: # For all truck + trailer combinati
Page 53 and 54: 6.0 Analysis of the 5-Axles or More
Page 57 and 58: # For the 3-S2 group, - One-fifth o
Page 61 and 62: 7.0 Analysis of Weights, Dimensions
Page 63 and 64: 7.2 Observations on Specific Truck
Page 65 and 66: # (3 + 2) Basic Enclosed Van [pop =
Page 67 and 68: - Annual VMT—mixed. # (3-S2) Insu
Page 69 and 70: - half (40-60%) operate mostly (80-
Page 71 and 72: # (3-S3) Tank Trucks for Liquids or
Page 73 and 74: Body Type Low Boy Platform Basic Pl
Page 75 and 76: Body Type Low Boy Platform Basic Pl
Page 77: There has been a substantial increa
Page 81 and 82: 7.5.2 Changes in Truck Lengths by 1
Page 83 and 84: 3-S2 Basic Enc. Van 3-S2 Refrigerat
Page 85 and 86: 7.5.3 Changes in Truck Weights # ME
Page 89 and 90: Table 7.5.3-2 Comparison of Mean "A
Page 91 and 92: Average Weight (lbs) 80,000 70,000
Page 93 and 94: Comparison of Mean Maximum Payload
Page 95 and 96: Comparison of Mean "Average" Payloa
Page 97 and 98: 8.0 Analysis of Vehicle Miles of Tr
Page 99 and 100: CHANGES BETWEEN 1992 AND 1997 Figur
Page 101 and 102: Mean VMT 100,000 90,000 80,000 70,0
Page 105 and 106: Appendix A Regional Distributions o
Page 107 and 108: 1997 Truck Fleet Traffic Region: No
Page 109 and 110: 1997 Truck Fleet Traffic Region: So
Page 111 and 112: Appendix B Regional Distributions o
Page 113 and 114: Not to Scale Truck + Trailer @ 6 or
Page 115 and 116: Not to Scale $ $ Tridem Axle Tracto
Page 117 and 118: 2-S1-2 STAA Tractor + Double Traile
Page 119 and 120: Not to Scale $ $ $ $ $ $ Base Scale
Page 121 and 122: 1997 Truck Fleet (@ 5-axles or more
Page 123 and 124: 1997 Truck Fleet (@ 5-axles or more
Page 125 and 126: Appendix C Detailed Body Type Analy
Page 127 and 128: Appendix C 1997 Truck Fleet (@ 5-ax
Page 129 and 130:
Appendix C 1997 Truck Fleet (@ 5-ax
Page 131 and 132:
Appendix C 1997 Truck Fleet (@ 5-ax
Page 133 and 134:
1997 Truck Fleet (@ 5-axles or more
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Appendix E Weights, Dimensions, and
Page 141 and 142:
VEHICLE TYPE: 3-S2 BODY TYPE: LOW B
Page 143 and 144:
VEHICLE TYPE: 3-S2 BODY TYPE: LIVES
Page 145 and 146:
VEHICLE TYPE: 3-S2 BODY TYPE: INSUL
Page 147 and 148:
VEHICLE TYPE: 3-S2 BODY TYPE: BASIC
Page 149 and 150:
VEHICLE TYPE: 3-S2 BODY TYPE: AUTOM
Page 151 and 152:
VEHICLE TYPE: 3-S2 BODY TYPE: DUMP
Page 153 and 154:
VEHICLE TYPE: 3-S2 BODY TYPE:TANK T
Page 155 and 156:
VEHICLE TYPE: 3+2 BODY TYPE: BASIC
Page 157 and 158:
VEHICLE TYPE: 3+2 BODY TYPE: POLE L
Page 159 and 160:
VEHICLE TYPE: 3+2 BODY TYPE: DUMP T
Page 161 and 162:
VEHICLE TYPE: 3-S3 BODY TYPE: LOW B
Page 163 and 164:
VEHICLE TYPE: 3-S3 BODY TYPE: INSUL
Page 165 and 166:
VEHICLE TYPE: 3-S3 BODY TYPE: POLE
Page 167 and 168:
VEHICLE TYPE: 3-S3 BODY TYPE: DUMP
Page 169 and 170:
VEHICLE TYPE: 2-S1-2 BODY TYPE: BAS
Page 171 and 172:
VEHICLE TYPE: 2-S1-2 BODY TYPE: BAS
Page 173 and 174:
Appendix F Average Payload Weights
Page 175 and 176:
VEHICLE TYPE: 3-S2 AVERAGE PAYLOAD
Page 177 and 178:
VEHICLE TYPE: STAA (2-S1-2) AVERAGE
Page 179 and 180:
VEHICLE TYPE: 3-S2 MAXIMUM PAYLOAD
Page 181 and 182:
VEHICLE TYPE: STAA (2-S1-2) MAXIMUM
Page 183 and 184:
Regional Comparison of Mean Tare (E
Page 185 and 186:
Regional Comparison of Mean Average
Page 187 and 188:
Regional Comparison of Percent of T
Page 189 and 190:
Regional Comparison of Percent of T
Page 191 and 192:
Regional Comparison of the Mean Ann
Page 193 and 194:
Regional Comparison of the Percent
Page 195 and 196:
Appendix H Data Analysis Methodolog
Page 197 and 198:
Configuration AXLRE Code 1997 4-S1
Page 199 and 200:
Vehicle Body Type VIUS Variables of
Page 201 and 202:
Major Body Type Groups and their As
Page 203 and 204:
Since the analysis was focused on t
Page 205 and 206:
Industrial "waste" water Hazardous
Page 207 and 208:
Simple Statistics In this analysis,
Page 209 and 210:
PRNPRO 164-165 WANNMIL 166-178 VG 1
Page 211 and 212:
Proc GLM data=dataset name; Class V
Page 213 and 214:
RUN; H - 19
Page 215 and 216:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE BUREAU
Page 217 and 218:
ITEM 5 Which best describes this ve
Page 219 and 220:
ITEM 11 What type of cab does this
Page 221 and 222:
ITEM 18 What percent of 1997 mileag
Page 223 and 224:
. ITEM 27 Which of the following be
Page 225:
ITEM 29 a. At any time during 1997
show all

Analysis of the Vehicle Inventory and Use Survey for Trucks ... - About

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?