American Bison - Buffalo Field Campaign
American Bison - Buffalo Field Campaign
American Bison - Buffalo Field Campaign
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
If a large population has undergone a recent reduction<br />
(=population bottleneck) in a short period of time (e.g., fewer<br />
than three generations), and is allowed to subsequently<br />
increase in size rapidly and without culling, the resulting<br />
population will probably suffer only small reductions in allelic<br />
variation and heterozygosity (Nei et al. 1975). The same is not<br />
true of the bottleneck effect in small populations, where the<br />
loss of allelic variation and heterozygosity tends to be much<br />
higher; in this case, extra measures must be taken to maximise<br />
the transfer of genetic diversity and minimise the loss of<br />
heterozygosity across generations.<br />
Several strategies can be used to alter the breeding strategy<br />
of a small herd to maximise recruitment rates and genetic<br />
diversity in the calf crops. For instance, attempts can be made to<br />
randomise breeding. <strong>Bison</strong> are naturally polygamous breeders,<br />
and it may be necessary or desirable to implement a controlled<br />
mating scheme to ensure that a maximum number of males<br />
are breeding with the available females, and to maximise the<br />
transmission of genetic variation across generations. If semen<br />
viability or other reproductive barriers are an issue, artificial<br />
insemination may also be considered.<br />
In some cases, altering the breeding strategy of a herd may<br />
not be sufficient to reverse the effects of small population size<br />
(e.g., Halbert et al. 2005a). In these cases, it may be necessary<br />
to import bison from other herds to improve recruitment rates<br />
and increase genetic variation. As the effects of importing bison<br />
into a small herd can be irreversible and even detrimental, the<br />
ultimate decision to implement this strategy should be made<br />
only after careful consideration, and as a last resort (all issues<br />
discussed in section 9.6.2 should be considered). Furthermore,<br />
options to maximise demographic and genetic impact (e.g.,<br />
importing several males vs. a few females) should be considered<br />
in threatened herds.<br />
9.2.7 Recovering herds from germplasm<br />
introgression<br />
If a bison herd has had an influx of germplasm (genetic<br />
material) from an outside source, including another bison<br />
herd or a related bovid species, the ability to recover the<br />
germplasm of the original herd depends on: 1) the ability to<br />
detect bison containing introgressed fragments, and 2) the<br />
number of generations since the original introgression event.<br />
For instance, if two distinct bison herds are accidentally mixed,<br />
parentage testing would allow for post-mating segregation<br />
of the two herds and their offspring provided that the bison<br />
from each herd are distinguishable (e.g., identification tags<br />
or sufficient genetic differences) and that a limited number of<br />
generations have passed (fewer than three). If more than a few<br />
generations have elapsed since the initial introgression event,<br />
the introgressed segments will become dispersed throughout<br />
92 <strong>American</strong> <strong>Bison</strong>: Status Survey and Conservation Guidelines 2010<br />
the genome of the herd (hybrid swarm) and reconstitution of<br />
the original germplasm will not be possible (Allendorf et al.<br />
2001). For example, low levels of domestic cattle introgression<br />
have been detected in many extant bison herds (Halbert 2003;<br />
Halbert et al. 2005b) and can be traced back to human-induced<br />
hybridisation of the two species over 100 years ago; in these<br />
cases, multiple domestic cattle fragments are dispersed so<br />
thoroughly throughout the genome that it is not possible to<br />
detect, much less remove, all introgressed fragments.<br />
9.2.8 Herd size reduction<br />
<strong>Bison</strong> have a high intrinsic reproductive rate and bison herds<br />
generally grow rapidly (see Chapter 6). Therefore, when<br />
resources are limited, bison herds often exceed the carrying<br />
capacity of their environment and begin to have negative<br />
impacts on other grazers and native plant species. As a<br />
result, most bison herds are subjected to some level of culling<br />
(=periodic removals) to maintain a suitable population size<br />
(Table 9.4). In extreme cases, it may be necessary to remove<br />
a large proportion of the population to meet management<br />
goals. For example, if bison have not been culled from a herd<br />
in several years, the herd may have nearly doubled in size, and<br />
it may threaten the survival of other species. In these cases,<br />
extreme caution should be taken to remove bison in a manner<br />
that will minimally influence herd and germplasm composition<br />
according to the following guidelines. Some discretion is needed<br />
in applying these guidelines. For example, it is important to<br />
avoid social disruption while simultaneously removing animals<br />
from all segments of the population. Managers must carefully<br />
evaluate their goals and the specific situation to achieve the best<br />
outcome (Table 9.4).<br />
9.3 Behaviour: Mating System, Social<br />
Structure, and Movements<br />
<strong>Bison</strong> behaviour is an index, or reflection, of the conditions<br />
experienced by individuals in a population, and behaviour is<br />
an emergent property of these conditions. For example, the<br />
intensity of competition for mates will be largely determined by<br />
population structure and density, and the ability of the herd to<br />
exploit environmental heterogeneity through foraging behaviours<br />
will be largely be determined by population density and habitat<br />
characteristics. Vertebrates exhibit a remarkable ability to<br />
modify behaviour, including territorial defence, mating system,<br />
or seasonal movement pattern, in response to environmental<br />
factors (Lott 1984). Here, we describe desirable behaviours<br />
related to social structure, mating, foraging, and movements.<br />
Unlike population or genetic composition, behaviours can only<br />
rarely be manipulated directly, and behavioural “adjustments”<br />
must be accomplished by modifying other factors.