14.10.2013 Views

American Bison - Buffalo Field Campaign

American Bison - Buffalo Field Campaign

American Bison - Buffalo Field Campaign

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

nomadic “Plains Indian Culture” observed by European explorers<br />

and missionaries at first contact (Duke 1991; Wedel 1959).<br />

Native North <strong>American</strong>s, during, and even after the Plains<br />

Woodland tradition, lived in larger more permanent villages. They<br />

depended on maize, bean, and gourd horticulture to name some<br />

of the most important domesticates, with winter dependence<br />

on deer and seasonal movements in the fall and spring to take<br />

advantage of migrating bison herds (Wilson 1987). This pattern is<br />

well represented ethnographically in the Middle Missouri Region.<br />

Groups like the Siouxan-speaking Mandan and Hidatsa, and the<br />

Caddoan-speaking Pawnee and Arikara, with the Wichita and<br />

others, were scattered along major Prairie rivers and tributaries<br />

like the Loup, Lower Loup, Canadian, and Washita, as far south<br />

as Nebraska, Kansas, and Oklahoma (Weltfish 1965). Large kill<br />

events, such as those represented at the Head-Smashed-In site<br />

in Alberta, generally did not occur until very late in the history<br />

of bison hunting on the Plains, and are represented from the<br />

Late Archaic and later periods (Byerly et al. 2005). The shift in<br />

hunting strategies may have been a response to increasing herd<br />

sizes, introduction of bow and arrow, and/or changes in social<br />

organisation (Driver 1990; Reeves 1990; Walde 2006).<br />

With increased resolution and clarity afforded by ethnohistoric<br />

and ethnographic investigations, human-bison interactions<br />

among historic native peoples are better described and<br />

documented than for the late Pleistocene and Holocene.<br />

<strong>Bison</strong> continued to be the preferred game for many native<br />

North <strong>American</strong> cultures, especially on the Great Plains and<br />

Prairies, providing food, clothing, shelter, and tools (Geist 1996;<br />

Roe 1970). Sustained by bison and plant resources, many<br />

native groups likely affected densities of other large herbivore<br />

species (Kay et al. 2000; Martin and Szuter 1999). In addition<br />

to significant ecological relationships, the bison was a central<br />

element in oral tradition, rituals, dances, and ceremonies of<br />

native peoples of the Plains (Wissler 1927), and it remains<br />

symbolically important in the cultural traditions of many native<br />

Tribes to this day.<br />

The arrival of Europeans in North America, after 1492,<br />

resulted in significant changes in human-bison interactions,<br />

and changed the fabric of Native <strong>American</strong> life forever.<br />

Introduced diseases such as smallpox decimated indigenous<br />

human populations (Crosby 1986), and altered subsistence,<br />

settlement, demography, and social organisation for many<br />

different groups. <strong>Bison</strong> hunting by native people was seasonal<br />

in nature. <strong>Bison</strong> were incorporated into a broad spectrum of<br />

plant and animal procurement activities (Holder 1970; Isenberg<br />

2000). <strong>Bison</strong> provided the economic basis for stable, resilient<br />

land use regimes and social systems. However, effects of<br />

Native <strong>American</strong> warfare and raiding during the historic period<br />

disrupted and destabilised these land use and social systems.<br />

The spread of horses into Great Plains aboriginal economies by<br />

the 1750s, and increasing commoditisation of bison products<br />

caused by the emergence of a European commercial market<br />

for wildlife products by the 1820s, contributed to the near<br />

extinction of the bison (Flores 1994; Isenberg 2000:27). Native<br />

peoples traded bison hides for Euro-american commodities, with<br />

the market in bison robes reaching a peak in the 1840s. Hide<br />

hunters began to significantly participate in the market hunting of<br />

plains bison in the 1850s, and by the 1890s had decimated the<br />

herds. Even bones were cleaned for sale to the eastern fertilizer<br />

market, an activity that continued to 1906 (Dary 1974).<br />

Numerous native North <strong>American</strong> tribes manage bison on native<br />

and tribal lands, but cultural, social and spiritual relationships<br />

with this animal are changing. For many Native <strong>American</strong>s<br />

there is still a strong spiritual and symbolic connection, but<br />

for others it is the potential commercial value of bison that<br />

is most important. For still others, it is the pragmatic use of<br />

bison for food, and the relationship between local control over<br />

food production and land, food security, tribal sovereignty,<br />

and decreasing reliance on outside sources for food and<br />

commodities that is emerging as a topic of concern, and a<br />

theme underlying tribal decision-making.<br />

It is not just the relationship between Native <strong>American</strong>s and<br />

bison that is changing, but the role of bison in the overall<br />

North <strong>American</strong> food system is changing as well. The North<br />

<strong>American</strong> perspective is shifting from the view that bison are<br />

an artifact from the past to be viewed as such in parks and<br />

preserves, to one that sees bison as a dynamic component<br />

of the <strong>American</strong> diet. Along with a new vision for a healthy<br />

ecological and genetic future for the <strong>American</strong> bison, food<br />

system researchers, food system enthusiasts, and the<br />

biomedical research community envision a new role for bison in<br />

the <strong>American</strong> diet. This role elevates the animal to priority over<br />

industrially raised beef and pork, and secures for it a place as<br />

the healthy alternative to a fatty, sugar-based diet that already<br />

has significant health impacts in terms of increased rates of<br />

cardiovascular disease, colorectal and other forms of cancer,<br />

and diabetes. Free-range bison meat is higher in omega-3 fatty<br />

acids than are grain-fed animals, perhaps even as high as wild<br />

salmon and other cold water fish species, and it is also high<br />

in conjugated linoleic acid, a fat-blocker and anti-carcinogen<br />

with the potential to reduce the risk of cancer, diabetes, and<br />

obesity. The extent to which bison can be produced efficiently<br />

and in healthy ways that do not further degrade ecosystems<br />

and ecosystem services, and marketed as a healthy food at<br />

an affordable price, will perhaps be the tipping points for how<br />

important bison become in a future <strong>American</strong> food system.<br />

Whether Native <strong>American</strong> or not, cultural values, attitudes, and<br />

perspectives are reflected in how we think about, manage, and<br />

handle animals in the wild, in commercial production systems,<br />

and after butchering and processing through marketing. <strong>Bison</strong><br />

are perhaps unique in that we manage them both as wildlife and<br />

<strong>American</strong> <strong>Bison</strong>: Status Survey and Conservation Guidelines 2010 11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!