American Bison - Buffalo Field Campaign
American Bison - Buffalo Field Campaign
American Bison - Buffalo Field Campaign
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Chapter 4 Genetics<br />
As a science, population genetics is concerned with the origin,<br />
nature, amount, distribution and fate of genetic variation present<br />
in populations through time and space. Genetic variation<br />
constitutes the fundamental basis of evolutionary change and<br />
provides the foundation for species to adapt and survive in<br />
response to changing intrinsic and extrinsic stressors. Therefore,<br />
loss of genetic diversity is generally considered detrimental<br />
to long-term species survival. In the short-term, populations<br />
with low levels of genetic diversity may suffer from inbreeding<br />
depression, which can increase their probability of extirpation<br />
and reduce fitness. Plains and wood bison experienced severe<br />
and well-documented population declines in the 19th Century<br />
that reduced the census size of this species by over 99.99%.<br />
The spectacular recovery to around 430,000 animals today<br />
(Chapter 7) is a testament to their genetic constitution, and<br />
represents one of the most significant accomplishments in<br />
modern conservation biology. <strong>American</strong> bison have, however,<br />
undergone artificial hybridisation with domestic cattle, been<br />
subjected to domestication and artificial selection, and been<br />
separated into many relatively small isolated populations<br />
occupying tiny fractions of their original range. As well, all wood<br />
bison populations contain some level of plains bison genetic<br />
material due to artificial hybridisation between the subspecies.<br />
All of these factors have had an effect on the current levels of<br />
genetic diversity and on the integrity of the bison genome. As<br />
a result, preservation of bison genetic diversity is a key long-<br />
term conservation consideration. The following sections discuss<br />
some of the major issues that are important for the genetic<br />
management of this species into the future.<br />
4.1 Reduction of Genetic Diversity<br />
Within species, genetic diversity provides the mechanism for<br />
evolutionary change and adaptation (Allendorf and Leary 1986;<br />
Chambers 1998; Meffe and Carroll 1994; Mitton and Grant<br />
1984). Reduction in genetic diversity can result in reduced<br />
fitness, diminished growth, increased mortality of individuals,<br />
and reduced evolutionary flexibility (Allendorf and Leary 1986;<br />
Ballou and Ralls 1982; Franklin 1980; Frankham et al. 1999;<br />
Mitton and Grant 1984;). There are four interrelated mechanisms<br />
that can reduce genetic diversity (heterozygosity and number of<br />
alleles): demographic bottlenecks, founder effects, genetic drift,<br />
and inbreeding (Meffe and Carroll 1994). Unfortunately, over the<br />
last two centuries, bison in North America have, to some degree,<br />
experienced all of these mechanisms.<br />
Lead Authors: Delaney P. Boyd, Gregory A. Wilson, James N. Derr, and Natalie D. Halbert<br />
As <strong>American</strong> bison approached extinction in the late 1800s,<br />
they experienced a severe demographic bottleneck, leading to<br />
a concern that extant bison populations may have lower genetic<br />
diversity than pre-decline populations. The consequences of<br />
a genetic bottleneck depend on the pre-bottleneck genetic<br />
diversity within a species, the severity of the decline, and how<br />
quickly the population rebounds after the bottleneck (Meffe and<br />
Carroll 1994; Nei et al. 1975). The decline of bison was severe,<br />
with a reduction from millions to fewer than 1,000 individuals.<br />
Recovery efforts, however, enabled bison populations to grow<br />
quickly, more than doubling between 1888 and 1902 (Coder<br />
1975). Although the effects of the bottleneck on the genetic<br />
diversity of the species are not clear (Wilson 2001), there are<br />
several possible repercussions. First, after a severe reduction in<br />
population size, average heterozygosity is expected to decline<br />
(Allendorf 1986; Nei et al. 1975). Heterozygosity is a measure of<br />
genetic variation that is a direct reflection of the past breeding<br />
history of a population. Heterozygosity values are expressed as<br />
the frequency of heterozygotes (i.e., genes with dissimilar alleles)<br />
expected at a given locus (Griffiths et al. 1993). A reduction in<br />
the level of heterozygosity can result in inbreeding effects. At<br />
the same time, a loss of alleles may limit a population’s ability<br />
to respond to natural selection forces and reduce the adaptive<br />
potential of a population (Allendorf 1986; Meffe and Carroll 1994;<br />
Nei et al. 1975; Robertson 1960).<br />
After the demographic crash, several small bison herds<br />
remained in North America, many of which were derived from<br />
very few animals. Overall levels of genetic variation in current<br />
populations can, in theory, vary directly with the number of<br />
original founders (Meffe and Carroll 1994; Wilson and Strobeck<br />
1999). Remnant populations may not have been representative<br />
of the original gene pool and, consequently, suffered reduced<br />
genetic variability. Through time, the detrimental effects of<br />
genetic drift may have compounded the effects of the earlier<br />
bottleneck. Genetic drift involves the random change in gene<br />
frequencies and leads to the loss of alleles over time. The rate<br />
of this loss, or fixation of alleles, is roughly inversely proportional<br />
to the population size (Allendorf 1986; Meffe and Carroll<br />
1994). However, the actual count of breeding individuals in a<br />
population is not appropriate for determining the rate of genetic<br />
drift because factors such as unequal sex ratios, differential<br />
reproductive success, overlapping generations, and non-random<br />
mating result in the “effective” population size always being less<br />
than the census size. For bison, the ratio of effective population<br />
size (N e ) to the census population size (N) has most commonly<br />
<strong>American</strong> <strong>Bison</strong>: Status Survey and Conservation Guidelines 2010 19