14.10.2013 Views

American Bison - Buffalo Field Campaign

American Bison - Buffalo Field Campaign

American Bison - Buffalo Field Campaign

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 4 Genetics<br />

As a science, population genetics is concerned with the origin,<br />

nature, amount, distribution and fate of genetic variation present<br />

in populations through time and space. Genetic variation<br />

constitutes the fundamental basis of evolutionary change and<br />

provides the foundation for species to adapt and survive in<br />

response to changing intrinsic and extrinsic stressors. Therefore,<br />

loss of genetic diversity is generally considered detrimental<br />

to long-term species survival. In the short-term, populations<br />

with low levels of genetic diversity may suffer from inbreeding<br />

depression, which can increase their probability of extirpation<br />

and reduce fitness. Plains and wood bison experienced severe<br />

and well-documented population declines in the 19th Century<br />

that reduced the census size of this species by over 99.99%.<br />

The spectacular recovery to around 430,000 animals today<br />

(Chapter 7) is a testament to their genetic constitution, and<br />

represents one of the most significant accomplishments in<br />

modern conservation biology. <strong>American</strong> bison have, however,<br />

undergone artificial hybridisation with domestic cattle, been<br />

subjected to domestication and artificial selection, and been<br />

separated into many relatively small isolated populations<br />

occupying tiny fractions of their original range. As well, all wood<br />

bison populations contain some level of plains bison genetic<br />

material due to artificial hybridisation between the subspecies.<br />

All of these factors have had an effect on the current levels of<br />

genetic diversity and on the integrity of the bison genome. As<br />

a result, preservation of bison genetic diversity is a key long-<br />

term conservation consideration. The following sections discuss<br />

some of the major issues that are important for the genetic<br />

management of this species into the future.<br />

4.1 Reduction of Genetic Diversity<br />

Within species, genetic diversity provides the mechanism for<br />

evolutionary change and adaptation (Allendorf and Leary 1986;<br />

Chambers 1998; Meffe and Carroll 1994; Mitton and Grant<br />

1984). Reduction in genetic diversity can result in reduced<br />

fitness, diminished growth, increased mortality of individuals,<br />

and reduced evolutionary flexibility (Allendorf and Leary 1986;<br />

Ballou and Ralls 1982; Franklin 1980; Frankham et al. 1999;<br />

Mitton and Grant 1984;). There are four interrelated mechanisms<br />

that can reduce genetic diversity (heterozygosity and number of<br />

alleles): demographic bottlenecks, founder effects, genetic drift,<br />

and inbreeding (Meffe and Carroll 1994). Unfortunately, over the<br />

last two centuries, bison in North America have, to some degree,<br />

experienced all of these mechanisms.<br />

Lead Authors: Delaney P. Boyd, Gregory A. Wilson, James N. Derr, and Natalie D. Halbert<br />

As <strong>American</strong> bison approached extinction in the late 1800s,<br />

they experienced a severe demographic bottleneck, leading to<br />

a concern that extant bison populations may have lower genetic<br />

diversity than pre-decline populations. The consequences of<br />

a genetic bottleneck depend on the pre-bottleneck genetic<br />

diversity within a species, the severity of the decline, and how<br />

quickly the population rebounds after the bottleneck (Meffe and<br />

Carroll 1994; Nei et al. 1975). The decline of bison was severe,<br />

with a reduction from millions to fewer than 1,000 individuals.<br />

Recovery efforts, however, enabled bison populations to grow<br />

quickly, more than doubling between 1888 and 1902 (Coder<br />

1975). Although the effects of the bottleneck on the genetic<br />

diversity of the species are not clear (Wilson 2001), there are<br />

several possible repercussions. First, after a severe reduction in<br />

population size, average heterozygosity is expected to decline<br />

(Allendorf 1986; Nei et al. 1975). Heterozygosity is a measure of<br />

genetic variation that is a direct reflection of the past breeding<br />

history of a population. Heterozygosity values are expressed as<br />

the frequency of heterozygotes (i.e., genes with dissimilar alleles)<br />

expected at a given locus (Griffiths et al. 1993). A reduction in<br />

the level of heterozygosity can result in inbreeding effects. At<br />

the same time, a loss of alleles may limit a population’s ability<br />

to respond to natural selection forces and reduce the adaptive<br />

potential of a population (Allendorf 1986; Meffe and Carroll 1994;<br />

Nei et al. 1975; Robertson 1960).<br />

After the demographic crash, several small bison herds<br />

remained in North America, many of which were derived from<br />

very few animals. Overall levels of genetic variation in current<br />

populations can, in theory, vary directly with the number of<br />

original founders (Meffe and Carroll 1994; Wilson and Strobeck<br />

1999). Remnant populations may not have been representative<br />

of the original gene pool and, consequently, suffered reduced<br />

genetic variability. Through time, the detrimental effects of<br />

genetic drift may have compounded the effects of the earlier<br />

bottleneck. Genetic drift involves the random change in gene<br />

frequencies and leads to the loss of alleles over time. The rate<br />

of this loss, or fixation of alleles, is roughly inversely proportional<br />

to the population size (Allendorf 1986; Meffe and Carroll<br />

1994). However, the actual count of breeding individuals in a<br />

population is not appropriate for determining the rate of genetic<br />

drift because factors such as unequal sex ratios, differential<br />

reproductive success, overlapping generations, and non-random<br />

mating result in the “effective” population size always being less<br />

than the census size. For bison, the ratio of effective population<br />

size (N e ) to the census population size (N) has most commonly<br />

<strong>American</strong> <strong>Bison</strong>: Status Survey and Conservation Guidelines 2010 19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!