26.10.2013 Views

Master Plan Update (pdf) - Lansing/Capital City Airport

Master Plan Update (pdf) - Lansing/Capital City Airport

Master Plan Update (pdf) - Lansing/Capital City Airport

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 4-1<br />

ALTERNATIVE RUNWAY CONFIGURATIONS<br />

Alternative Runway Configuration<br />

1 Existing<br />

2 Existing with Primary Runway Extension<br />

3 Converging Runways<br />

4 Closely Spaced Parallel Runways<br />

5 Dependent Parallel Runways<br />

6 Independent Parallel Runways<br />

Each alternative is evaluated in the following sections.<br />

<strong>Capital</strong> Region <strong>Airport</strong> Authority<br />

<strong>Capital</strong> <strong>City</strong> <strong>Airport</strong> <strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>Update</strong><br />

1. Existing<br />

The existing airfield includes the current runway configuration and lengths. The existing airfield has<br />

distinct large and small aircraft operational characteristics.<br />

• Runway 10R/28L accommodates all aircraft using the <strong>Airport</strong>.<br />

• Runway 10L/28R is restricted to small, predominantly general aviation aircraft. Much of the<br />

capacity for this runway is used for touch and go training operations. The origin and<br />

destination locations on the <strong>Airport</strong> for aircraft typically using this runway are located across<br />

Runway 10R/28L and 6/24.<br />

• Runway 6/24 has limited runway length and operations are limited to predominantly general<br />

aviation and corporate aircraft. The intersection geometry of the ends of Runways 6 and 10L<br />

are such that these runways are not usable simultaneously. Because of the prevailing winds<br />

and the limited current demand by large aircraft, Runway 6/24 is not used extensively. Its<br />

primary use is in high wind situations. The capacity of this runway essentially represents a<br />

trade-off with that of Runway 10L/28R so the determination of total airfield capacity effectively<br />

does not consider simultaneous use of these runways.<br />

• 2. Existing With Extension<br />

In terms of alternative consideration and evaluation, the existing configuration with primary runway<br />

extension supersedes the existing configuration, as the extension is being implemented<br />

independent of this master plan. However, the existing configuration is included for benchmarking<br />

and alternative comparison purposes.<br />

The existing airfield with the future Runway 28L extension maintains the same configuration and<br />

the same lengths for Runways 10L/28R and 6/24. The operational characteristics are the same as<br />

the existing configuration.<br />

• 3. Converging Runways<br />

An extension of 3,475 feet is added to the end of Runway 24 to produce two converging runways<br />

capable of serving large air carrier aircraft. Airfield capacity increase through the use of converging<br />

runways is based on an “assured landing” either holding short of, or passing the intersecting<br />

runway before an operation can occur on the intersecting runway. Capacity is increased as the<br />

second aircraft movement can occur while the first aircraft is still occupying its runway.<br />

With this alternative, the Runway End 6 is shortened by as much as 700 feet to bring the runway<br />

safety area in to compliance with FAA design standards. The shortening of this runway and<br />

associated relocation of obstruction clearance surfaces in the approach area, results in restrictions<br />

on developable area and aircraft movement areas in the southwest corner of the airport.<br />

Alternatives 4-7 Final

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!