Master Plan Update (pdf) - Lansing/Capital City Airport

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Source: U.S. DOT and Federal Aviation Administration Exhibit 1-8 DETROIT SECTIONAL Capital Region Airport Authority Capital City Airport Master Plan Update The aeronautical environment in the immediate vicinity of the Airport includes several areas designated Class D airspace. In addition, there are 12 victor airways utilizing the Lansing VORTAC and numerous other victor airways located in the vicinity of the Airport. 1.3.5.3 Instrument Approaches IFR procedures into terminal areas typically consist of one or a combination of instrument procedures. Instrument procedures associated with an airport can include standard terminal arrivals (STAR), standard instrument departures (SID), or instrument approach procedures. These approach procedures are classified as visual, non-precision, or precision approaches, with the latter two classified as instrument approaches. Visual approaches require that sight contact be maintained at all times with the runway facilities and other aircraft in the vicinity of the airport. Often these approaches are unmonitored and demand pilot proficiency in see-and-avoid Inventory 1-20 Final
Capital Region Airport Authority Capital City Airport Master Plan Update procedures. Non-precision and precision instrument approaches are controlled approaches and are monitored by the local air traffic jurisdiction. Non-precision approaches differ from precision approaches in that they only provide horizontal guidance, while precision instrument approaches provide both horizontal and vertical guidance information. With the addition of vertical guidance information, precision approaches enable aircraft operations in lower visibility and cloud heights. The Airport is served by a variety of published instrument approaches utilizing visual, nonprecision, and precision approach technology. These instrument approach procedures are identified in Table 1-5. Table 1-5 PUBLISHED INSTRUMENT APPROACHES Runway Approach NAVAID Facility or Waypoint Approach Technology Inbound Heading (degrees) 10R ILS Localizer I-CPQ Precision 096 28L ILS Localizer I-LAN Precision 276 6 VOR / GPS Lansing Non-Precision 057 24 VOR / GPS Lansing Non-Precision 276 28L NDB / GPS ARTDA NDB Non-Precision 276 Source: U.S. Terminal Procedures, U.S. Government Flight Information Publication 1.3.5.4 National Air Traffic Control System The FAA is responsible for providing a safe, secure, and efficient global aviation system. To fulfill this responsibility the Air Traffic Services Division of the FAA oversees the control and supervision of activity within the National Airspace System to provide air traffic control. The Air Traffic Services operational responsibilities include assurance of aircraft separation, air traffic management, dissemination of aviation information, management and maintenance of airways and NAVAID facilities, approach to landing procedures, and aircraft search and rescue. Control within the National Airspace System is maintained by incorporating a network of air traffic control facilities, which include flight service stations (FSS), air traffic control towers (ATCT), terminal radar approach control (TRACON), and air route traffic control centers. FSS and ATCT are primarily involved with the coordination of air traffic operations within the terminal environment, TRACON facilities coordinate air traffic in the approach and departure segments of flight, and air route traffic control centers coordinate air traffic operations within the en route segment. More detailed information regarding the National Air Traffic Control System can be found in Appendix E. 1.3.5.5 Airport Air Traffic Control The Lansing Automated FSS (AFSS) is currently the only station located in the State of Michigan. Relocated to just south of the main terminal apron, the Lansing AFSS opened on December 3, 1986, after the FAA initiated a nation-wide consolidation of FSS. The station provides weather briefings for pilots in the lower peninsula of Michigan. Each position within the station has a weather terminal that allows access to all the information necessary to complete a briefing, record VFR and IFR flight plans, and obtain weather graphics for current meteorological conditions. The federally run Lansing ATCT employs controllers who fulfill the air traffic control functions of ground control, tower control, and updating the automated terminal information service (ATIS). The ATCT operates 24 hours per day to control the movements of all aircraft within a five-mile radius of Capital City Airport up to an altitude of 2,500 feet AGL. Additionally, these controllers are Inventory 1-21 Final
Page 3: Capital Region Airport Authority Ca
Page 6 and 7: Capital Region Airport Authority Ca
Page 14 and 15: List of Appendices Appendix A Gloss
Page 16 and 17: The forecast of aviation activity c
Page 18 and 19: • Provide designated areas for ca
Page 20 and 21: Environmental Considerations The en
Page 22 and 23: 1.1 Introduction CHAPTER 1 INVENTOR
Page 25 and 26: 1.1 Introduction CHAPTER 1 INVENTOR
Page 27 and 28: 1.2.2.1 Location Exhibit 1-1 EXISTI
Page 29 and 30: Exhibit 1-3 REGIONAL MAP Capital Re
Page 35 and 36: 1.2.3.3 Aviation Activity Overview
Page 39 and 40: 1.3.1 Runways Exhibit 1-6 AIRSIDE F
Page 41 and 42: 1.3.3 Visual Aids Exhibit 1-7 AIRPO
Page 43: Capital Region Airport Authority Ca
Page 47 and 48: Exhibit 1-9 FIRST FLOOR FUNCTIONAL
Page 49 and 50: Table 1-7 AIRLINE SPACE DISTRIBUTIO
Page 51 and 52: Table 1-9 CONCESSION SPACE DISTRIBU
Page 53 and 54: Table 1-12 GOVERNMENT SPACE DISTRIB
Page 55 and 56: 1.4.3.1 Public Curb Exhibit 1-13 PA
Page 57 and 58: Table 1-14 GENERAL AVIATION BUILDIN
Page 59 and 60: 1.6.2 Aircraft Rescue and Fire Figh
Page 63 and 64: • Off-airport access roads • On
Page 65 and 66: 1.7.3.1 Public Parking Exhibit 1-18
Page 67 and 68: 1.8.2 Land Use / Zoning Capital Reg
Page 69 and 70: 1.10 Business Aspects Capital Regio
Page 71 and 72: Concessions 9.6% Land Rentals 10.0%
Page 73 and 74: CHAPTER 2 FORECAST OF AVIATION DEMA
Page 75 and 76: 2.1.2 Airlines Serving the Airport
Page 79 and 80: Number of Enplanements 400,000 350,
Page 81 and 82: Annual Operations 180,000 160,000 1
Page 83 and 84: Millions of Pounds 70 60 50 40 30 2
Page 85 and 86: 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% -10.0%
Page 87 and 88: 2000 - 2023 1970 - 2000 2000 - 2023
Page 93 and 94: 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100
Page 95 and 96:
2.3.3 Market Share Analysis Capital
Page 97 and 98:
900,000 800,000 700,000 600,000 500
Page 99 and 100:
600,000 500,000 400,000 300,000 200
Page 101 and 102:
Capital Region Airport Authority Ca
Page 103 and 104:
2.4.2 Annual General Aviation Opera
Page 105 and 106:
2.4.4 Itinerant and Local Operation
Page 107 and 108:
2.5 Forecast of Enplaned Cargo Capi
Page 109 and 110:
2.6 Based Aircraft Capital Region A
Page 111 and 112:
2.7 Annual Instrument Approaches Ca
Page 113 and 114:
Percent of Total 12.5% 11.5% 10.5%
Page 115 and 116:
Percent of Total Capital Region Air
Page 117 and 118:
2.9 Comparison with Other Forecast
Page 119 and 120:
Table 2-30 OPERATIONS COMPARISON Ca
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123:
2.10 Summary of Forecasts Capital R
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Exhibit 3-2 DEMAND CAPACITY CALCULA
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
L G Exhibit 3-3 TAXIWAY SYSTEM C M
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
3.4.3.4 Taxiway Lighting Capital Re
Page 148 and 149:
3.6 Terminal Area Requirements Capi
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
3.6.1.3 Terminal Expansion Options
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
Table 3-23 SHORT AND LONG TERM PUBL
Page 162 and 163:
Table 3-25 RENTAL CAR REQUIREMENTS
Page 164 and 165:
3.7.2 Aircraft Apron Table 3-26 HAN
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
Page 172 and 173:
Page 174 and 175:
Page 176 and 177:
3.10.2.1 Curbfront Traffic Demand E
Page 178 and 179:
Exhibit 3-6 TERMINAL CURBFRONT LANE
Page 180 and 181:
3.11 Land Requirements Capital Regi
Page 182 and 183:
3.17 Summary Capital Region Airport
Page 184 and 185:
Page 186 and 187:
Page 188 and 189:
Parallel Taxiway Terminal Redevelop
Page 190 and 191:
4.3 Leading Elements Based on the f
Page 192 and 193:
Exhibit 4-3 LEADING ELEMENTS ALTERN
Page 194 and 195:
Page 196 and 197:
Page 198 and 199:
Page 200 and 201:
Table 4-4 PASSENGER ORIGIN LOCATION
Page 202 and 203:
Page 204 and 205:
A. Existing Terminal Access Capital
Page 206 and 207:
4.3.5.5 Implementation Capital Regi
Page 208 and 209:
Table 4-5 LEADING ELEMENT ALTERNATI
Page 210 and 211:
Table 4-7 LEADING ELEMENT ALTERNATI
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
4.4.2 Aviation Support Facilities E
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223:
Parallel Taxiway Terminal Redevelop
Page 226 and 227:
Page 228 and 229:
Page 230 and 231:
Page 232 and 233:
Page 234 and 235:
Page 236 and 237:
Page 238 and 239:
Page 240 and 241:
• FAA Advisory Circular 150/5070-
Page 242 and 243:
Object Table 6-1 OBJECTS AND FEATUR
Page 244 and 245:
• Glide Slope Design Standard Com
Page 271:
EXISTING RUNWAY 24 OBSTRUCTIONS SUM
Page 283:
NOTES ● PROPERTY LISTED BY LOCATI
Page 286 and 287:
• Additional employee parking, re
Page 288 and 289:
Page 290 and 291:
Table 7-1 HISTORICAL CASH FLOW Capi
Page 292 and 293:
Page 294 and 295:
$90,000,000 $80,000,000 $70,000,000
Page 296 and 297:
Page 298 and 299:
Page 300 and 301:
Table 7-6 PROFORMA CASH FLOW (Page
Page 302 and 303:
Table 7-6 PROFORMA CASH FLOW (Page
Page 304:
show all

Master Plan Update (pdf) - Lansing/Capital City Airport

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?