Technical Reports Parts C,D - ICPDR

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 3.3. Summary of recommended projects for industrial hot spots Hot Spot Name, River & Location (distance from mouth) Reconstruction of timber processing industry in upper Tizsa in Ukraine: a composite project Rakhiv Cardboard Factory, Tisza river Parameters & Values which Define the Problem Includes reconstruction of waste water treatment facilities of Velyky Bychkiv, Teresva timber processing plant and Rakhiv cardboard factory; consists of projects 3, 4, and 22 Total BOD: 39 t/y, phenols no official discharge data, total discharge: 792.000 m 3 /day Ranking of the Problem Name & Type of Project (Structural or Non – structural) medium Structural Project No consists of No3 No4, and 22 Medium priority Structural Project No 22 Velikiy Bichkiv Timber processing Plant, Tizsa River Teresva Timber processing Plant, Tizsa river Outdated WWTP, pollution with phenols and chlorinated organic compounds. Total BOD: 23 t/y, Total discharge : 839.900 m 3 /day, pollution with phenols and oil products Medium priority Medium priority Structural Project No 3 Structural Project No4 Izmail Cardboard Plant Insufficient input capacity of industrial WWTP with increased producing capacity. Low priority Structural Project No 11, WWTP Project Strategy & Targets feasibility study, reconstruction and construction of waste water treatment facilities, improvement of technological processes Reconstruction of existing & Construction of new WWT facilities and accumulation pounds, improvement of the technology processes Construction of new WWT facilities (secondary chemical treatment) Reconstruction of existing & Construction of new WWT facilities (secondary treatment) Reconstruction of existing WWT Improving of the existing technological process Parameters & Values which Define Project Benefits pollution reduction from timber processing industry in the Tizsa River basin in Ukraine Reduction of the Tissa river pollution with phenols, oil products and especially BOD organic. Developing recreational and sport fishing uses & Elimination of transboundary affect. Developing recreational use & Elimination of regional and possible transboundary affect Existing capacity will be use more rational Project Beneficiaries Rakhiv Cardboard Factory, Municipality of Rakhiv town & Zhakarpatska oblast Velikiy Bichkiv Timber processing Plant & Municipality of Velikiy Bichkiv town & Zhakarpatska oblast Improvement of regional and transboundary situation, Zhakarpatska oblast Municipality of Izmail Town, Improvement of transboundary affect on Black Sea Odesska oblast.
<strong>Technical</strong> <strong>Reports</strong> – Part D: Water Environmental Engineering 151 3.4. Reduction of Water Pollution from Dump Sites At present time 40 mln. m 3 of sludge are produced from wastewater treatment plants. Sludge should be stored on the special sludge landfields. After disinfection measures and environmental impact assessment sludge can be used as fertilizers (in reality about 5% or 2 mln. m 3 is only utilized). There is no data at present time on dumpsites in Danube basin. There are not any facilities in the region for preparation of wastewater treatment sludge for utilization. There is not any incineration facilities or other facilities for solid waste disposal in the region. This is one of the most serious problems of the region because of the landfields and dumpsites are serious source of diffuse pollution in the region. In many cases they severely affect to ground water quality as for example in Bolgrad district of Odessa region as was reported by Odessa State Ecological Inspection. The future activity for pollution reduction from these pollution sources must be directed on inventory of pollution sources, assessment of the size of diffuse pollution and introduction of ecologically friendly technology for the solid waste processing and disposal. Ukraine will need external financial support to carry out the needed assessment and introduction of new technology in the field of solid waste disposal. 3.5. Special Policy Measures Economic Regulatory Tools for Water Resources Rational Use, Protection, and Restoration currently are under development in Ukraine. Ukraine introduces payments for natural resources use and fines for environmental pollution based on the principle “polluters pay” and allocation of these revenues for the environmental protection, conservation and restoration measures. Ukraine introduced the payment for special water use, which implies differentiation of water users. Ukraine regulates water uses through issuing permits and licensing. 3.5.1. Organizational-Economic Measures, Which Provide Water Resources Rational Use, Protection, and Restoration Organizational-economic measures, which provide water resources rational use, protection, and restoration envisage: 1. issuing permits for special water use; 2. establishment of norms and amounts of payments for water extraction and polluting substances discharge; 3. establishing norms and amounts of payments for water use in hydropower generation and water transportation; 4. granting tax, credit and other privileges to water users if they implement low-waste, waste-free, energy- and resource-saving technologies, perform other measures in compliance with legislation, that reduce negative effect on waters; 5. compensation of damage for water bodies resulting from violation of legislation, according to the established procedure. 3.5.2. Payments for Special Water Use Payments for special water use are established in order to provide water resources rational use, protection, and restoration, and include payments for water extraction from water body and polluting substances discharge in it.
Page 1:
DANUBE POLLUTION REDUCTION PROGRAMM
Page 5 and 6:
Preface The National Reviews were d
Page 7:
Part C Water Quality
Page 10 and 11:
4.4. River Channel Characteristics.
Page 12 and 13:
Table 3.9. Table 3.10. Table 3.11.
Page 15:
List of Abbreviations on Water Qual
Page 19 and 20:
1. Summary 1.1. Updating, Evaluatio
Page 21 and 22:
Technical Reports - Part C: Water Q
Page 23 and 24:
2. Updating of Hot Spots Major muni
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39:
Page 42 and 43:
24 Danube Pollution Reduction Progr
Page 44 and 45:
26 Danube Pollution Reduction Progr
Page 47 and 48:
4. Updating and Validation of Water
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
5. Brief Overview of Legal and Inst
Page 69:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Table 6.2. Wetlands of the Ukrainia
Page 79 and 80:
Matroskaja Lake Kugurluj Matroskaja
Page 81 and 82:
Mirnoe liman Grabovsky Desantnoe ll
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113:
Page 117: Figure 1 Zakarpattia Region (1) Hot
Page 121: Figure 3 Ivano-Frankivsk region Hot
Page 125: Figure 5 Odessa Region Hot spots Mo
Page 129: Technical Reports - Part C: Water Q
Page 133 and 134: Table of Contents 1. Summary.......
Page 135: Table of Tables Table 2.1. Table 2.
Page 139 and 140: Glossary on Water Environmental Eng
Page 141 and 142: 1. Summary National Targets and Ins
Page 143: Technical Reports - Part D: Water E
Page 146 and 147: Table 2.2. Pollution substances inp
Page 148 and 149: 130 Danube Pollution Reduction Prog
Page 160 and 161: Table 3.1. Summary of recommended p
Page 166 and 167: Table 4.2. Summary of recommended p
Page 173 and 174: 4. Expected Effects of Current and
Page 175 and 176: 5. Cost Estimation of Programmes an
Page 177: 6. Planning and Implementing Capaci
Page 181 and 182: Table 1. Compilation of actual inve
Page 183 and 184: Table 1 continued No Type/name of P
Page 191: Technical Reports - Part D: Water E
show all

Technical Reports Parts C,D - ICPDR

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?