Technical Reports Parts C,D - ICPDR

More documents

Recommendations

Info

20 Danube Pollution Reduction Programme – National Review, Ukraine Table 2.15. Summary of information for the Liski hot spot Collective Farm “Pogranichnik” Summary of Information Used for Ranking the Hot Spot Critical Emissions Total BOD: no data Total discharge: 20 Th. m 3 per year Seasonal Variations no direct discharge into Danube River; Immediate Causes of no treatment facilities Emissions Root Causes of Water nutrients discharges; bacteriological pollution Quality Problems Receiving Waters no data available Nearby Downstream Uses may effect drinking water supply (ground water); Transboundary no data available Implications Rank low priority 2.4. Industrial Hot Spots 2.4.1. High Priority Under current economic situation the high priority rank is not applicable to industrial “hot spots”. 2.4.2. Medium Priority Table 2.16. Summary of information for Velyky Bychkiv Timber Processing Plant hot spot Velyky Bychkiv Timber Processing Plant Summary of Information Used for Ranking the Hot Spot Critical Emissions Total BOD: 23,0 t per year Phenols: no data Total discharge: 839,9 Th. m 3 per year Seasonal Variations discharges into Tisza River; Immediate Causes of outdated wastewater treatment facilities Emissions Root Causes of Water possible pollution with phenol compounds; Quality Problems Receiving Waters impact on downstream aquatic life; impact of river water quality Nearby Downstream Uses may affect recreation and sport fishing Transboundary may affect water quality in Hungary Implications Rank medium priority
<strong>Technical</strong> <strong>Reports</strong> – Part C: Water Quality 21 2.4.3. Low Priority. Table 2.17. Summary of information for the Rakhiv Cardboard Factory hot spot Rakhiv Cardboard Factory Summary of Information Used for Ranking the Hot Spot Critical Emissions Total BOD: 39 t a year Phenols: no data Total discharge: 792 Th. m 3 per year Seasonal Variations Discharge into Uzh River; Immediate Causes of insufficient capacity of wastewater treatment facilities Emissions Root Causes of Water Quality Problems possible pollution with phenols and other organic micro pollutants; insufficient wastewater treatment because of outdated technologies Receiving Waters scarcity of aquatic organisms in the vicinity of the hot spot. of Prut river Nearby Downstream Uses does not effect drinking water supply; effects ecosystem and aquatic life of downstream rivers, recreation and sport fishing; Transboundary Implications may have transboundary impact on water users in Slovakia with very low risk Rank Low priority Table 2.18. Summary of information for the Teresva Timber Processing hot spot Teresva Timber Processing Factory Summary of Information Used for Ranking the Hot Spot Critical Emissions Total BOD: 1 t a year Phenols: no data Total discharge: 441 Th. m 3 per year Seasonal Variations Discharge into Uzh River; dilution factor is under elaboration Immediate Causes of insufficient capacity of wastewater treatment facilities Emissions Root Causes of Water Quality Problems possible pollution with phenols and other organic micro pollutants; insufficient wastewater treatment because of outdated technologies Receiving Waters scarcity of aquatic organisms in the vicinity of the hot spot. of Prut river Nearby Downstream Uses does not effect drinking water supply; effects ecosystem and aquatic life of downstream rivers, recreation and sport fishing; Transboundary Implications may have transboundary impact on water users in Slovakia with very low risk Rank Low priority
Page 1: DANUBE POLLUTION REDUCTION PROGRAMM
Page 5 and 6: Preface The National Reviews were d
Page 7: Part C Water Quality
Page 10 and 11: 4.4. River Channel Characteristics.
Page 12 and 13: Table 3.9. Table 3.10. Table 3.11.
Page 15: List of Abbreviations on Water Qual
Page 19 and 20: 1. Summary 1.1. Updating, Evaluatio
Page 21 and 22: Technical Reports - Part C: Water Q
Page 23 and 24: 2. Updating of Hot Spots Major muni
Page 37: Technical Reports - Part C: Water Q
Page 42 and 43: 24 Danube Pollution Reduction Progr
Page 44 and 45: 26 Danube Pollution Reduction Progr
Page 47 and 48: 4. Updating and Validation of Water
Page 67 and 68: 5. Brief Overview of Legal and Inst
Page 69: Technical Reports - Part C: Water Q
Page 77 and 78: Table 6.2. Wetlands of the Ukrainia
Page 79 and 80: Matroskaja Lake Kugurluj Matroskaja
Page 81 and 82: Mirnoe liman Grabovsky Desantnoe ll
Page 97 and 98:
Technical Reports - Part C: Water Q
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113:
Page 117:
Figure 1 Zakarpattia Region (1) Hot
Page 121:
Figure 3 Ivano-Frankivsk region Hot
Page 125:
Figure 5 Odessa Region Hot spots Mo
Page 129:
Page 133 and 134:
Table of Contents 1. Summary.......
Page 135:
Table of Tables Table 2.1. Table 2.
Page 139 and 140:
Glossary on Water Environmental Eng
Page 141 and 142:
1. Summary National Targets and Ins
Page 143:
Technical Reports - Part D: Water E
Page 146 and 147:
Table 2.2. Pollution substances inp
Page 148 and 149:
130 Danube Pollution Reduction Prog
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
Table 3.1. Summary of recommended p
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
Page 173 and 174:
4. Expected Effects of Current and
Page 175 and 176:
5. Cost Estimation of Programmes an
Page 177:
6. Planning and Implementing Capaci
Page 181 and 182:
Table 1. Compilation of actual inve
Page 183 and 184:
Table 1 continued No Type/name of P
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191:
Technical Reports - Part D: Water E
show all

Technical Reports Parts C,D - ICPDR

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?