Technical Reports Parts C,D - ICPDR
Technical Reports Parts C,D - ICPDR
Technical Reports Parts C,D - ICPDR
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Technical</strong> <strong>Reports</strong> – Part C: Water Quality 19<br />
Table 2.13. Summary of information for the Rakhiv Cardboard Factory hot spot<br />
Rakhiv Cardboard<br />
Summary of Information Used for Ranking the Hot Spot<br />
Factory<br />
Critical Emissions Total BOD: 39 t a year<br />
Phenols: no data<br />
Total discharge: 792 Th. M 3 per year<br />
Seasonal Variations Discharge into Uzh River;<br />
Immediate Causes of insufficient capacity of wastewater treatment facilities<br />
Emissions<br />
Root Causes of Water<br />
Quality Problems<br />
possible pollution with phenols and other organic micro pollutants;<br />
insufficient wastewater treatment because of outdated technologies<br />
Receiving Waters scarcity of aquatic organisms in the vicinity of the hot spot. of Prut river<br />
Nearby Downstream Uses does not effect drinking water supply; effects ecosystem and water life of<br />
downstream rivers, recreation and sport fishing;<br />
Transboundary<br />
may have transboundary impact on water users in Slovakia with very low risk<br />
Implications<br />
Rank<br />
medium priority<br />
2.3. Agricultural Hot Spots<br />
2.3.1. High Priority<br />
This rank is not applicable under current economic situation; inventory is needed for adequate<br />
assessment of agricultural “hot spots” of high priority<br />
2.3.2. Medium Priority<br />
This rank is not applicable under current economic situation; additional studies is needed for<br />
adequate assessment of agricultural “hot spots” of medium priority<br />
2.3.3. Low Priority.<br />
Table 2.14.<br />
Summary of information for the Kylia hot spot<br />
Collective Farm “Put<br />
Summary of Information Used for Ranking the Hot Spot<br />
Lenina”<br />
Critical Emissions Total BOD: no data<br />
Phenols: no data<br />
Total discharge: 25,71 Th. m 3 per year<br />
Seasonal Variations no direct discharge into Danube River;<br />
Immediate Causes of absence of treatment facilities<br />
Emissions<br />
Root Causes of Water possible pollution of ground water; possible nutrients discharge<br />
Quality Problems<br />
Receiving Waters no available data<br />
Nearby Downstream Uses effect drinking water supply (ground waters);<br />
Transboundary<br />
no available data<br />
Implications<br />
Rank<br />
low priorities