Technical Reports Parts C,D - ICPDR

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 5.1. Cost of actual planned investment portfolio Type/name of Project or Programme Total Capital Requirements Fundi ng Period Equit y Envir. Fund Water Manag Fund Central Budget National Funding Sources International Funding Rem arks Public Loans Public Grants Reg. Budget Local Budget Centra l Budget Reg Budget Loca l Bud get Comm . Bank Loans Othe rs Orga nisati on Grant Loan (MNC) (MUS$) (MNC) (MNC) (MNC) (MNC) (MNC) (MNC) (MNC) (MNC) (MNC) (MNC) (MNC) (MUS$) (MUS$) Actual Investment Portfolio 103,48 51,74 1,35 38,76 - 2,041 0,04 - - 0,01 0,9 - - - 16,0 14,19 Planned Investment 265,158 132,579 4,55 0,05 - 56,09 7,9 82,238 15,98 6,36 13,6 - - - 1,15 38,5 Portfolio Total sum 368,638 184,319 5,9 38,81 - 58,131 7,94 82,238 15,98 6,36 13,6 - - - 17,15 52,69
6. Planning and Implementing Capacity 6.1. Planning Capacity Compilation of actual planning capacities of authorities, institutions, companies etc. cannot be clearly described. Transition period in political, economic and managerial fields as well as structural changes in industry and agriculture impose many complications. The law on self governance delegates more rights to the local authorities but because of the very beginning of the process and not fully developed legislation roles of different stockholder and not clear. Economic restrictions do not allow to accelerate transition from planning to real implementation of projects and programmes. At the moment capacity of Ukrainian institutions and engineering companies in project proposal, project design, business plan development, preparation of project documents is sufficient for preparation of bankable documents but cannot be funded properly without foreign assistance. The foreign financial assistance in field of inventory of information needs, development of information exchange and databases as well as training in international accounting and other market economic issues is needed. In Annexes of project proposals planning and engineering companies are indicated. 6.2. Implementing Capacities 6.2.1. Implementing Capacities for Structural Projects On the whole the treatment plants for municipal and industrial wastewater can be constructed by Ukrainian companies if funding is sufficient. The co-operation with foreign companies may be very useful but not always crucial. Special machinery and pipes, corrosion resistant pumps, electric regulatory items, etc. can be procured from other countries when considering quality/costs benefits. Some items are not currently produced in the country. 6.2.2. Implementing Capacity of Non-structural Project In spite of heavy economic situation Ukraine has sufficient capacity for implementation of nonstructural project. The overall coordinating activity of the Ministry of Environmental Protection is supplemented by the other governmental bodies involved in the environmental protection. Ukraine has strong academic institutes under the umbrella of the National Academy of Sciences to implement scientific component of these project. The complementary significant activities of nonstructural projects may be implemented by sector institutes for applied research. Non-structural projects may be supported and implemented to some extent by joint stock companies, private research, consulting, business and other companies. The non-governmental organizations active in the Danube River basin will ensure wide involvement of public and students in implementation of non-structural projects. For those projects that include inventories, surveys, research or development of regulatory norms and standards, as well as NGO development the financial support is needed from international cooperation.
Page 1:
DANUBE POLLUTION REDUCTION PROGRAMM
Page 5 and 6:
Preface The National Reviews were d
Page 7:
Part C Water Quality
Page 10 and 11:
4.4. River Channel Characteristics.
Page 12 and 13:
Table 3.9. Table 3.10. Table 3.11.
Page 15:
List of Abbreviations on Water Qual
Page 19 and 20:
1. Summary 1.1. Updating, Evaluatio
Page 21 and 22:
Technical Reports - Part C: Water Q
Page 23 and 24:
2. Updating of Hot Spots Major muni
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39:
Page 42 and 43:
24 Danube Pollution Reduction Progr
Page 44 and 45:
26 Danube Pollution Reduction Progr
Page 47 and 48:
4. Updating and Validation of Water
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
5. Brief Overview of Legal and Inst
Page 69:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Table 6.2. Wetlands of the Ukrainia
Page 79 and 80:
Matroskaja Lake Kugurluj Matroskaja
Page 81 and 82:
Mirnoe liman Grabovsky Desantnoe ll
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113:
Page 117:
Figure 1 Zakarpattia Region (1) Hot
Page 121:
Figure 3 Ivano-Frankivsk region Hot
Page 125: Figure 5 Odessa Region Hot spots Mo
Page 129: Technical Reports - Part C: Water Q
Page 133 and 134: Table of Contents 1. Summary.......
Page 135: Table of Tables Table 2.1. Table 2.
Page 139 and 140: Glossary on Water Environmental Eng
Page 141 and 142: 1. Summary National Targets and Ins
Page 143: Technical Reports - Part D: Water E
Page 146 and 147: Table 2.2. Pollution substances inp
Page 148 and 149: 130 Danube Pollution Reduction Prog
Page 160 and 161: Table 3.1. Summary of recommended p
Page 173 and 174: 4. Expected Effects of Current and
Page 175: 5. Cost Estimation of Programmes an
Page 181 and 182: Table 1. Compilation of actual inve
Page 183 and 184: Table 1 continued No Type/name of P
Page 191: Technical Reports - Part D: Water E
show all

Technical Reports Parts C,D - ICPDR

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?