Faculty Handbook - Fairmont State University
Faculty Handbook - Fairmont State University
Faculty Handbook - Fairmont State University
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
(2) Merit Evaluations for a minimum of five years since the last rank was attained should be<br />
included.<br />
(3) The applicant's Dean must also submit a letter supporting the application and attesting to<br />
the applicant's eligibility for the Senior Level and his/her achievements.<br />
(4) Additional letters of support may be included from graduates, professional organizations,<br />
peers, advisory boards, or others.<br />
(5) The Provost of <strong>Fairmont</strong> <strong>State</strong> <strong>University</strong> will send the applications to the Senior Level<br />
<strong>Faculty</strong> Personnel Committee. This committee will be comprised of <strong>University</strong> faculty who<br />
have attained the Senior Level designation; this committee will review senior level<br />
applications for both the <strong>University</strong>. This committee structure will be reviewed after two<br />
years. The committee will send its recommendations to the Provost and the President for<br />
final approval.<br />
Please note: The number of applicants who are approved for the new levels in any given year will<br />
be determined both by the quality of the applications and by budgetary restrictions.<br />
Deadline and Notes<br />
Applications, including letters from the Deans, must be in the Provost’s office by the first working<br />
day in December.<br />
Note: Professor/Senior Level and Associate Professor/Senior Level were approved by FSU <strong>Faculty</strong><br />
Senate on 11/09/04, The Board of Governors on 11/29/04, and the HEPC on 1/27/05.<br />
Promotion to Other Ranks or Tenure<br />
A faculty member seeking promotion in rank or tenure initiates the procedure by submitting the<br />
required Promotion or Tenure Application packet, vita, and portfolio containing relevant<br />
documents to his/her Dean early enough so that the Dean can complete the evaluation and submit<br />
it, along with the Application and Portfolio, to the Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs<br />
by December 1. 14<br />
Evaluations of the candidate by two peers within the College/School are required, one peer to be<br />
chosen by the candidate and one by the Dean. If the candidate is a school chairperson, one peer<br />
evaluator will be selected by the Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs. Each peer must<br />
submit his/her evaluation directly to the Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs by<br />
December 1. 15 These evaluations are part of the application packet.<br />
The Provost verifies that official transcripts confirm the candidate’s qualifications. The Provost then<br />
forwards the Application and Portfolio to the <strong>Faculty</strong> Personnel Committee for its consideration<br />
and recommendation. After deliberation, the Committee sends its report to the Provost and Vice<br />
President for Academic Affairs who forwards the Application and Portfolio to the President along<br />
with the Provost’s recommendation.<br />
The President of the <strong>University</strong> will make the final decision regarding promotion. The President will<br />
then inform the candidate of the decision regarding the promotion.<br />
35<br />
14 An applicant who performs academic duties in more than one administrative unit or school must be evaluated separately by each Dean.<br />
15 An applicant whose teaching duties are divided equally between two schools is required to have evaluations submitted by two peers in each<br />
school, following the peer selection process described above. If the applicant teaches more courses in one school than in another, evaluations<br />
must be submitted by peers in the school where the greater number of courses is taught<br />
Revised by <strong>Faculty</strong> Senate November 21, 2003