LA MORT DE MITRIDATE - University of Liverpool
LA MORT DE MITRIDATE - University of Liverpool
LA MORT DE MITRIDATE - University of Liverpool
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Introduction<br />
• Text with cartons inserted into liminary pages after ẽ1 r + papillon: Arsenal<br />
4-BL-3476 (1)<br />
• Text with cartons replacing original pages but no papillon: Trinity<br />
College: OLS L-5-966 (8); Arsenal 4-BL-3477(1), where page 49 has been<br />
damaged but the missing words and line 987 have been written in, but not<br />
the stage direction<br />
• Texts with papillon but no cartons: Rés. YF-394; Rés. YF-471, although<br />
the papillon has been torn <strong>of</strong>f and the lines thereby mutilated; 8-RF-6277<br />
(1); Cambridge; Trinity College: OLS L-5-968 (1)<br />
• Text without cartons or papillon: Sorbonne.<br />
Pages 27-28 and 35-36 are prime examples <strong>of</strong> the kind <strong>of</strong> problems that arose<br />
during the printing, <strong>of</strong> how one copy <strong>of</strong> the play can differ from another, and why<br />
it was felt necessary to reset and reprint these leaves. More detail is provided in<br />
the notes to those pages, but suffice it to say here that:<br />
• As originally printed, in line 532 on page 27, the word grands was spelled<br />
out in its entirety requiring that it take up the following line. Page 27 thus<br />
finished a line earlier at line 547. Page 28, however, still finished at line<br />
567 because line 566 was missed out entirely. In the resetting, by using a<br />
tilde to produce grãds, it was possible to fit line 532 into a single line thus<br />
providing extra space for line 548 as the last line on the page and enough<br />
space therefore on page 28 to fit in the missing line 566.<br />
• Line 680 was also transposed from the top <strong>of</strong> page 35 to the top <strong>of</strong> page<br />
36, where it found itself inserted between lines 700 and 701 <strong>of</strong> our text.<br />
The moving <strong>of</strong> the line to its rightful place during the resetting thus caused<br />
no problem as regards fitting the requisite number <strong>of</strong> lines into the same<br />
amount <strong>of</strong> space on the two pages.<br />
During the resetting <strong>of</strong> the pages the opportunity was taken to tidy up a few<br />
other points: tenses <strong>of</strong> verbs, the occasional phrase, the modernization <strong>of</strong> spelling.<br />
Unfortunately, during the resetting, yet new errors crept in to the ostensibly<br />
corrected pages. For example, as originally printed, line 699, which begins ‘S’il a<br />
peu conserver’, was perfectly correct, while in the ‘corrected’ carton, the line<br />
begins thus: ‘Peu con S’il a server’, a phenomenon called pie, or muddled type.<br />
Since paper was the biggest expense <strong>of</strong> the printing process, resetting and<br />
reprinting cancel leaves was kept to the minimum. Small errors were to be<br />
covered by the errata, but there are still mistakes common to all texts which are<br />
not mentioned in that list. For example, in Act III, scene 3 <strong>of</strong> all copies, Mitridate<br />
is given rather than Pharnace as the name <strong>of</strong> the character who speaks at line 965.<br />
Furthermore, the pagination is wrong between pages 75 and 80. In all but two <strong>of</strong><br />
the copies I have seen, page 82 is printed 28; one <strong>of</strong> the Arsenal texts (4-BL-3477<br />
(1)) and the Sorbonne copy have the correct page number, showing that<br />
63