02.05.2014 Views

COMPLETE DOCUMENT (1862 kb) - OECD Nuclear Energy Agency

COMPLETE DOCUMENT (1862 kb) - OECD Nuclear Energy Agency

COMPLETE DOCUMENT (1862 kb) - OECD Nuclear Energy Agency

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4.4 Risk and hazard assessment over time<br />

While the radiotoxic inventory is a physical-biological concept intrinsically based on the laws<br />

of radioactive decay and the radiological damage due to a quantity of radioactivity incorporated in the<br />

human body, the risk and hazard concepts on the contrary rely on the extent of conditioning and<br />

packaging of waste streams, on the long-term behaviour of waste packages in geological media and on<br />

the routes which could be followed by radioactive releases on their return to the biosphere and to<br />

mankind.<br />

• In a first phase one has to assess the direct radiological impact of additional fuel cycle<br />

operations.<br />

• The second step is the radiological assessment of the waste types created by the AFC<br />

operations.<br />

• Finally the hazard assessment over time is closely related to the repository design and<br />

location.<br />

4.4.1 Pre-disposal waste management of RFC operations<br />

The first positive impact is the expected decrease in uranium mining requirements. It may be<br />

estimated that recycling Pu in LWR-MOX reduces the uranium needs by 20%. If the MAs were also<br />

recycled a maximum benefit of 25% could be expected.<br />

The present world-wide uranium requirements [172] are about 63 700 t natural uranium per<br />

year (in 1997) and this quantity might increase to values ranging between 62 500 and 82 800 t in 2015.<br />

The collective dose taken by about 250 000 workers world-wide is 1 300±300 man-Sv. The hypothetical<br />

reduction of uranium needs throughout the world by universal Pu recycling would decrease the mining<br />

requirements by 11 000 to 13 000 t based on the present needs, and 13 000 to 16 000 t based on future<br />

extrapolated needs. According to UNSCEAR data [173,174] the average effective dose for underground<br />

workers is 5 to 10 mSv/year depending on the type of mining a) .<br />

The uranium requirements can also be expressed in t/GWe-year (load factor = 0.8). In the<br />

present conditions this corresponds to 183 t/GWe-year or 26 t/TWhe. The average dose to workers<br />

expressed in amount of uranium extracted is 23 ± 3 man-mSv/t natural uranium. World-wide recycling<br />

of Pu as LWR-MOX would consequently reduce the collective dose by 20 to 25% or 260~375 man-Sv<br />

to about 1 000 man-Sv. But this is a hypothesis which cannot be taken for granted since it would imply<br />

a drastic change in the national fuel cycle and reprocessing policies of some major countries.<br />

However, we may deduce the specific dose rate saving per GWe-year or TWhe in order to<br />

compare these “savings” with the other contributions in the fuel cycle. The uranium requirements can be<br />

reduced from 183 tHM to 138-146 t/GWe-year or 20.8-19.5 t/TWh in case of Pu and actinide recycling<br />

in LWRs.<br />

a) A recent report indicated overestimation of the dose from U-mining activities by a factor of 200-400,<br />

see Long-Term Population Dose Due to Radon (Rn-222) Released From Uranium Mill Tailings,<br />

SENES Consultants Limited, Canada, April (1998)<br />

208

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!