02.05.2014 Views

COMPLETE DOCUMENT (1862 kb) - OECD Nuclear Energy Agency

COMPLETE DOCUMENT (1862 kb) - OECD Nuclear Energy Agency

COMPLETE DOCUMENT (1862 kb) - OECD Nuclear Energy Agency

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The main conclusions of these US reports are:<br />

• the toxicity of high-level waste during the first thousand years cannot be reduced by<br />

transmutation since the cross-sections of the isotopes 90 Sr, 137 Cs, 3 H and 85 Kr are too<br />

small;<br />

• the cost of alternative reprocessing in order to reduce the actinide content to a level below<br />

100 nCi/g (3 700 Bq/g) is very high and requires the construction of advanced aqueous<br />

reprocessing facilities and/or the development and construction of pyrochemical<br />

reprocessing units;<br />

• the use of LMRs for burning plutonium and actinides would require the construction of an<br />

aqueous reprocessing capacity of ~2 000 tHM/year and the deployment of 30 GWe LMR<br />

capacity creating a cost penalty of $0.5 billions to $2 billions per year. The spent fuels<br />

from LMRs would be reprocessed in a smaller scale pyrochemical unit which has still to<br />

be developed;<br />

• the decentralised structure of the US electricity production, the absence of economic<br />

incentive for reprocessing and the changes in the regulatory requirements (NRC and EPA)<br />

for disposal facilities make the acceptance of P&T as a waste management scenario very<br />

improbable under the present economic conditions;<br />

• the radiotoxicity of a repository is not accepted as a scientific argument in the assessment<br />

of the risk except in the case of human intrusion.<br />

Only the combined use of 137 Cs – 90 Sr separation and actinide burning followed by a long (300<br />

years) surface storage would alleviate the repository heat problem.<br />

The most recent and most comprehensive assessment report on P&T was issued by the<br />

National Academy of Science of the US under the chairmanship of N.C. Rasmussen [209]. The report is<br />

entitled “<strong>Nuclear</strong> Wastes: Technologies for Separations and Transmutation” and covers all aspects of<br />

the problem from an American point of view. The principal recommendations listed in the report are:<br />

• none of the P&T system concepts reviewed eliminates the need for geological disposal;<br />

• the current policy of the “once-through-cycle” should be continued;<br />

• fuel retrievability should be extended to ~100 years;<br />

• R&D should be conducted on selected topics of P&T.<br />

In France, a National Evaluation Commission was appointed in 1993 in order to supervise the<br />

R&D activities in the field of radioactive waste management. Reports were issued [210-212] in 1995,<br />

1996 and 1997. In the field of P&T, the following recommendations were made:<br />

• priority should be given to separation of Am-Cm from rare earths followed by Am/Cm<br />

separation;<br />

• among the fission products priority should be given to Cs and Tc;<br />

235

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!