COMPLETE DOCUMENT (1862 kb) - OECD Nuclear Energy Agency
COMPLETE DOCUMENT (1862 kb) - OECD Nuclear Energy Agency
COMPLETE DOCUMENT (1862 kb) - OECD Nuclear Energy Agency
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The disposal geometry to be selected for a specific repository site must be compatible with the<br />
different thermal requirements imposed by the specific medium. The thermal analysis performed<br />
recommended a spacing between emplacement drifts of 50 to 100 m for clay, 35 m for granite and 23 m<br />
for salt. The length of the waste emplacement drift will be limited to 500 m for practical reasons, with a<br />
cross-section of about 5 m 2 and capacity for up to 87 disposal canisters. For adequate buffering, the<br />
space between canisters has been fixed at 1 m for granite and salt options, and 2.5 m for a clay option.<br />
Once the emplacement activities are finished, all open space inside the repository mine must<br />
be backfilled and sealed. Different backfilling materials will be used (in-situ compacted reconstituted<br />
clay for the clay option, in-situ compacted mixture of bentonite and sand for the granite option, and insitu<br />
compacted crushed salt for the salt option). Filled regions will be isolated from the rest of the<br />
emplacement area by means of dedicated seals. The repository area will be isolated by seals in the<br />
access shafts.<br />
A probabilistic performance assessment for a generic site in a granitic host rock formation has<br />
been completed. It has permitted evaluation of the relative importance and performance of the various<br />
components of the repository total system as well as a sensitivity analysis of the various parameters.<br />
A normal evolution scenario, with appropriate performance ascribed to the designed<br />
engineering barriers, has been considered as reference scenario. A hydrogeological regime based on<br />
present-day conditions and a reference biosphere has been assumed.<br />
Figure II.28 shows the mean dose rates obtained for the normal evolution scenario averaged<br />
over 100 simulation runs. A peak dose of 2.36 µSv/year, well below the regulatory limit of<br />
100 µSv/year, is reached 600 000 years after waste disposal, with 129 I responsible for 99% of it.<br />
Figure II.28 Evolution of mean dose rates in the case of disposal<br />
of 40 GWd/tHM UOX spent fuel<br />
10 -6<br />
Total<br />
Mean dose rate (Sv/year)<br />
10 -7<br />
10 -8<br />
10 -9<br />
10 -10<br />
10 -11<br />
10 -12<br />
I-129<br />
10 -5 10 3 10 4 10 5 10 6<br />
Se-79<br />
Pd-107<br />
Sn-126<br />
Cl-36<br />
Ra-226<br />
Cs-135<br />
Th-230<br />
10 -13<br />
Time (year)<br />
221