02.05.2014 Views

COMPLETE DOCUMENT (1862 kb) - OECD Nuclear Energy Agency

COMPLETE DOCUMENT (1862 kb) - OECD Nuclear Energy Agency

COMPLETE DOCUMENT (1862 kb) - OECD Nuclear Energy Agency

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3. DESCRIPTION OF THE FUEL CYCLES<br />

Definition of partitioning and transmutation<br />

Partitioning is a complex series of chemical and/or metallurgical operations, intended to<br />

separate selected radiotoxic nuclides or groups of nuclides from the bulk of radionuclides occluded in<br />

the spent fuel elements which are periodically discharged from nuclear reactors. The separated nuclides<br />

or group of nuclides can be stored as such or transformed into new fuel elements or irradiation targets.<br />

Transmutation is a general term covering as well elementary nuclear conversion through single<br />

neutron capture as fission of heavy nuclides, spallation and other nuclear reactions involving neutrons.<br />

The aim of transmutation in the context of this study is to reduce the long-term inventory of radiotoxic<br />

nuclides by converting the initial nuclides either into short-lived radionuclides or into stable nuclides.<br />

3.1 The nuclear fuel cycles<br />

The nuclear fuel cycles include all the operations necessary to supply fresh fuel to the power<br />

plants and to manage the spent fuels discharged from the reactors. Figure I.3 shows the main steps of<br />

the reprocessing fuel cycle (RFC), which are the following for light water reactors:<br />

• the front-end of the cycle covers operations ranging from uranium ore prospecting to the<br />

transport of fuel elements to the power plant for refuelling: ore extraction and treatment to<br />

produce a uranium concentrate, conversion of the concentrate to hexafluoride sent to<br />

uranium enrichment plants to raise the content of the isotope 235 U from its natural level<br />

(0.72%) to a level of 3 to 5%, and fuel element fabrication.<br />

• the back-end of the cycle comprises two complementary alternatives today:<br />

– the closed cycle based on spent fuel reprocessing, which is designed to separate and<br />

recycle the energy materials (mainly plutonium) which they contain, and to optimise<br />

waste management for disposal;<br />

– the so-called “open cycle” with direct disposal of the irradiated fuels in a geological<br />

repository after an interim storage period of variable length.<br />

Figure I.4 shows an example of the annual material flows in a fuel cycle with a mixed<br />

PWR-FR park. Figure I.5 shows a fuel cycle where only FRs are used for energy productions.<br />

In the present report, four types of fuel management are considered.<br />

39

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!