The National Forest Policy (1998) states that “unregulated <strong>trade</strong> can instigate uncontrolled exploitation and has <strong>the</strong> potential of accelerating forest destruction and degradation through loss of biodiversity” (Anon., 1998a). Trade in forest products, in particular for <strong>timber</strong> and charcoal, has contributed to <strong>the</strong> degradation of miombo woodlands and coastal forests that cover two-thirds of <strong>the</strong> country (Anon., 2001b). The past decade has shown marked changes in <strong>timber</strong> <strong>trade</strong> dynamics, <strong>with</strong> a geographic shift in supply and changes in species composition influenced by accessibility to, and abundance of, forest resources. For example, <strong>with</strong> decreasing availability of <strong>the</strong> preferred Pterocarpus angolensis, preference has turned to o<strong>the</strong>r species, notably Brachystegia speciformis and Afzelia quanzensis. Fur<strong>the</strong>r, decline in availability and size of targeted species such as Pterocarpus angolensis in western and central Tanzania has led to rising exploitation of less accessible sources, including <strong>the</strong> coastal forests and miombo woodlands of Lindi Region. Miombo woodlands remain a vital natural resource for <strong>the</strong> country, both for economic and ecological reasons. They make up two-thirds of Tanzania’s forests and woodlands and stretch down through Zambia and Mozambique into Zimbabwe. These areas have a high floral diversity and concentrations of large and, sometimes, rare mammals, many of which migrate seasonally (e.g. elephants). Miombo woodland intergrades <strong>with</strong> coastal forests and surround some of <strong>the</strong> Eastern Arc Mountains, both areas of global conservation value for <strong>the</strong>ir high levels of species richness and endemism. Isolation of sou<strong>the</strong>rn Tanzania miombo woodlands and coastal forests Up until 2003, poor roads and <strong>the</strong> absence of permanent river crossings largely isolated <strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rn miombo woodlands and coastal forests from Dar es Salaam. In particular, seasonal flooding across <strong>the</strong> Rufiji River delta almost completely prevented terrestrial movements of <strong>timber</strong> and o<strong>the</strong>r cargo across its banks during parts of <strong>the</strong> year (Figure 1). Before <strong>the</strong> newly constructed Mkapa Bridge was opened, only one major ferry operated on <strong>the</strong> Rufiji River, situated at a small settlement called Ndundu, south of Ikwiriri town. With over 33% of <strong>the</strong> nation’s population, 75% of its industry and <strong>the</strong> highest national rate of urban migration, Dar es Salaam is Tanzania’s largest consumer and export market for hardwood <strong>timber</strong>. However, relative isolation has prevented <strong>the</strong> large natural stands of valuable hardwoods occurring in miombo woodlands and coastal forests in Lindi and Mtwara Regions from <strong>the</strong> massive exploitation witnessed in o<strong>the</strong>r parts of <strong>the</strong> country. Fur<strong>the</strong>r, this isolation has left <strong>the</strong>se regions <strong>with</strong> amongst <strong>the</strong> poorest infrastructure in <strong>the</strong> country, particularly roads, power and communications. Low economic prospects have resulted in this area being one of <strong>the</strong> nation’s poorest (Anon., 2000d). It can be reasonably argued that economic and social progress in <strong>the</strong> area have been hindered by not fully capitalizing on <strong>the</strong> existing development potential of natural resources from <strong>the</strong> remaining tracts of wildnerness. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, isolation may have also prevented <strong>the</strong> likely scenario whereby outsiders 4 gain unrestricted access to, and receive most of <strong>the</strong> benefits from, <strong>the</strong>se woodland and forest resources, to <strong>the</strong> detriment of local communities who lack <strong>the</strong> capacity to ensure equitable and sustainable benefit sharing. 4 People not from <strong>the</strong> local area, often characterized by <strong>the</strong>ir higher capital and capacity to <strong>trade</strong> than local communities, but <strong>with</strong> fewer incentives for sustainable management. 9
Figure 1 Map of sou<strong>the</strong>rn Tanzania showing location of Rufiji River and o<strong>the</strong>r geographic details Sources: Tanzania Natural Resources Information Centre; Hunting Technical Services, 1997. 10
- Page 2 and 3: Published by TRAFFIC East/Southern
- Page 4 and 5: CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 3 ABBREVI
- Page 6 and 7: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This study was mad
- Page 8 and 9: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The close relatio
- Page 10 and 11: guidance from central and district
- Page 14 and 15: However, significant changes in dev
- Page 16 and 17: METHODOLOGY This study was conducte
- Page 18 and 19: Field Research Research assistants
- Page 20 and 21: Table 2 Types of analyses made amon
- Page 22 and 23: south bank (1270 m 3 ). Therefore,
- Page 24 and 25: commenced in 1986 have converted th
- Page 26 and 27: The majority of reserved forests an
- Page 28 and 29: Degradation of forests and deforest
- Page 30 and 31: medicinal plants for curing illness
- Page 32 and 33: STUDY AREA OVERVIEW The study area
- Page 34 and 35: The coastal forests found in the st
- Page 36 and 37: Data on harvest licences covering a
- Page 38 and 39: Figure 8 Sawn wood and logs shipped
- Page 40 and 41: eported to be very low, with most s
- Page 42 and 43: ound wood from the study area. Over
- Page 44 and 45: Species harvested in 2001, but not
- Page 46 and 47: checkpoint records from Kibiti, stu
- Page 48 and 49: Figure 13 Main species processed by
- Page 50 and 51: Two species, Swartzia madagascarens
- Page 52 and 53: melanoxylon (Class I), Milicia exce
- Page 54 and 55: A few species have shown particular
- Page 56 and 57: The frequency distributions of leng
- Page 58 and 59: HARVEST AREAS, DESTINATIONS, MARKET
- Page 60 and 61: Major harvest areas in Lindi Region
- Page 62 and 63:
licences show how MI (Ltd.), the la
- Page 64 and 65:
Figure 26 Off-road logging truck ro
- Page 66 and 67:
Table 25 Total number of vehicles r
- Page 68 and 69:
Seasonal variations in timber trade
- Page 70 and 71:
Figure 35 Total timber shipments fr
- Page 72 and 73:
Figure 37 Volumes (m 3 ) of Pteroca
- Page 74 and 75:
Hymenaea verrucosa (Gum copal tree,
- Page 76 and 77:
Figure 43 Volumes (m 3 ) of Dalberg
- Page 78 and 79:
Charcoal shipments Official data on
- Page 80 and 81:
Figure 47 Quantities of charcoal (b
- Page 82 and 83:
Table 32 Proportion of selected woo
- Page 84 and 85:
DISCUSSION Evidence of linkages bet
- Page 86 and 87:
fees, applying ‘minimum breath he
- Page 88 and 89:
saw millers and traders from Dar es
- Page 90 and 91:
are indicated on the licences. For
- Page 92 and 93:
RECOMMENDATIONS Costs of not taking
- Page 94 and 95:
Table 35. Monitoring indicators inc
- Page 96 and 97:
DESCRIPTION OF INDICATOR BASELINE D
- Page 98 and 99:
DESCRIPTION OF INDICATOR BASELINE D
- Page 100 and 101:
(Figure 51). Regulatory options to
- Page 102 and 103:
Alternative energy sources Accounti
- Page 104 and 105:
Anon. (1999g). Tanzania Country Str
- Page 106 and 107:
De Waal, D. (2001). Setting Precend
- Page 108 and 109:
Milliken, J. (1999). Youth migrants
- Page 110 and 111:
ANNEXES Annex 1 Tanzania industrial
- Page 112 and 113:
However, forests outside Forest Res
- Page 114 and 115:
arks at TZS 2000 (USD 1.95) per kg
- Page 116 and 117:
mm and relatively unreliable. The h
- Page 118 and 119:
Coast Region has a total forest are
- Page 120 and 121:
Table 43 Sectoral contribution to L
- Page 122 and 123:
Annex 5. Sample checkpoint form for