Local Biodiversity Strategy: - Shire of Kalamunda
Local Biodiversity Strategy: - Shire of Kalamunda
Local Biodiversity Strategy: - Shire of Kalamunda
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Summary <strong>of</strong> General Comments Officer Comments Reference for<br />
Items Actioned<br />
Section 6. Vision Statement<br />
Section 6 on page 31, The vision statement does not say how<br />
much <strong>of</strong> the LNA’s (quantity, size or percentage <strong>of</strong> an original<br />
representation) will be protected. Without some indication, it<br />
could only protect a very small portion.<br />
Section 6 on page 31, The vision statement refers to<br />
‘biodiversity values’ rather than ‘biodiversity’ which implies the<br />
protection <strong>of</strong> the communities’ values in regard to biodiversity<br />
and is therefore susceptible to misinterpretation. While we<br />
appreciate that the Vision Statement was decided by members <strong>of</strong><br />
a Steering Group, it is recommended that the word ‘values’ not<br />
be used in this context.<br />
Comment noted. There are more specific details provided<br />
in regard to the protection <strong>of</strong> LNAs in Sections 8 and 9.<br />
Comment noted. The vision statement was developed<br />
through the Steering Group with input from<br />
representatives <strong>of</strong> the Community, Government Agencies,<br />
Councillors and <strong>Shire</strong> Staff and therefore it has not been<br />
amended.<br />
See Section 8<br />
<strong>Biodiversity</strong><br />
Feature Targets<br />
pages 33 - 48;<br />
and Section 9<br />
Representation<br />
Targets pages 48<br />
- 60.<br />
Section 8. <strong>Biodiversity</strong> Feature Targets<br />
Box 3 on page 34, What is the size definition <strong>of</strong> “significant<br />
natural area remaining”?<br />
Comment noted. There is no specific size definition for a<br />
“significant natural area remaining” as there is no lower<br />
limit on size for retention and protection <strong>of</strong> natural areas<br />
containing TECs and each natural area should be assessed<br />
on a case by case basis.<br />
8.1.2 on page 34, These species should be protected …. “should<br />
read” shall (or will ) be protected… “to ensure that they are<br />
protected.<br />
Document amended to reflect comment. See page 34.<br />
<strong>Local</strong> <strong>Biodiversity</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> Page 114