04.07.2014 Views

Local Biodiversity Strategy: - Shire of Kalamunda

Local Biodiversity Strategy: - Shire of Kalamunda

Local Biodiversity Strategy: - Shire of Kalamunda

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Summary <strong>of</strong> General Comments Officer Comments Reference for<br />

Items Actioned<br />

Section 6. Vision Statement<br />

Section 6 on page 31, The vision statement does not say how<br />

much <strong>of</strong> the LNA’s (quantity, size or percentage <strong>of</strong> an original<br />

representation) will be protected. Without some indication, it<br />

could only protect a very small portion.<br />

Section 6 on page 31, The vision statement refers to<br />

‘biodiversity values’ rather than ‘biodiversity’ which implies the<br />

protection <strong>of</strong> the communities’ values in regard to biodiversity<br />

and is therefore susceptible to misinterpretation. While we<br />

appreciate that the Vision Statement was decided by members <strong>of</strong><br />

a Steering Group, it is recommended that the word ‘values’ not<br />

be used in this context.<br />

Comment noted. There are more specific details provided<br />

in regard to the protection <strong>of</strong> LNAs in Sections 8 and 9.<br />

Comment noted. The vision statement was developed<br />

through the Steering Group with input from<br />

representatives <strong>of</strong> the Community, Government Agencies,<br />

Councillors and <strong>Shire</strong> Staff and therefore it has not been<br />

amended.<br />

See Section 8<br />

<strong>Biodiversity</strong><br />

Feature Targets<br />

pages 33 - 48;<br />

and Section 9<br />

Representation<br />

Targets pages 48<br />

- 60.<br />

Section 8. <strong>Biodiversity</strong> Feature Targets<br />

Box 3 on page 34, What is the size definition <strong>of</strong> “significant<br />

natural area remaining”?<br />

Comment noted. There is no specific size definition for a<br />

“significant natural area remaining” as there is no lower<br />

limit on size for retention and protection <strong>of</strong> natural areas<br />

containing TECs and each natural area should be assessed<br />

on a case by case basis.<br />

8.1.2 on page 34, These species should be protected …. “should<br />

read” shall (or will ) be protected… “to ensure that they are<br />

protected.<br />

Document amended to reflect comment. See page 34.<br />

<strong>Local</strong> <strong>Biodiversity</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> Page 114

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!