04.07.2014 Views

Local Biodiversity Strategy: - Shire of Kalamunda

Local Biodiversity Strategy: - Shire of Kalamunda

Local Biodiversity Strategy: - Shire of Kalamunda

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Summary <strong>of</strong> General Comments Officer Comments Reference for<br />

Items Actioned<br />

Several targets refer to ‘significant or substantial populations’ <strong>of</strong><br />

Priority Species or Threatened and Specially Protected Species.<br />

Recommend the word ‘viable’ be used instead. The former words<br />

are open for interpretation. The aim should be to protect<br />

populations <strong>of</strong> flora and fauna that are viable in the long term.<br />

Definition <strong>of</strong> what is a viable population <strong>of</strong> a species can be<br />

better determined and more objective than relying on subjective<br />

judgements <strong>of</strong> what is considered significant or substantial.<br />

Comment noted. Considered in the development <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Local</strong> <strong>Biodiversity</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong>. The term viable is also difficult<br />

to quantify as what a viable population may be for long<br />

term retention <strong>of</strong> a particular species is not well known.<br />

The <strong>Local</strong> <strong>Biodiversity</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> does not mention ‘Potentially<br />

Threatened Ecological Communities’ and significant flora and<br />

fauna species (other than rare and priority species).<br />

Significant species are recognised by the EPA as a conservation<br />

priority (EPA 2006). The list <strong>of</strong> significant species for the Perth<br />

Metropolitan Region is listed in Bush Forever Volume 2 (Govt. <strong>of</strong><br />

Western Australia 2000b).<br />

Box 6 on page 40, What is the definition <strong>of</strong> substantial in ‘retain<br />

and protect natural areas containing substantial populations <strong>of</strong><br />

…’?<br />

Priority one and two flora species should be ensured absolute<br />

protection, regardless <strong>of</strong> the size, if their loss should mean<br />

extinction <strong>of</strong> the species.<br />

Document amended to reflect comment. See Section 8<br />

<strong>Biodiversity</strong><br />

Feature Targets<br />

pages 33 – 48.<br />

Comment noted. Considered in the development <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Local</strong> <strong>Biodiversity</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong>. Although various State<br />

Government policies refer to priority species, Statutory<br />

protection would benefit from the introduction <strong>of</strong> a State<br />

<strong>Biodiversity</strong> Conservation Act.<br />

Comment noted. Considered in the development <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Local</strong> <strong>Biodiversity</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong>. The term substantial is also<br />

difficult to quantify as what a substantial population may<br />

be for long term retention <strong>of</strong> a species is variable and<br />

should be considered on a case by case basis.<br />

Comment noted. Priority flora have the same level <strong>of</strong><br />

protection as all endemic species under the Wildlife<br />

Conservation Act, 1950. The <strong>Shire</strong> looks forward to the<br />

introduction <strong>of</strong> the impending <strong>Biodiversity</strong> Conservation<br />

<strong>Local</strong> <strong>Biodiversity</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> Page 115

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!