treasure valley road dust study: final report - ResearchGate
treasure valley road dust study: final report - ResearchGate
treasure valley road dust study: final report - ResearchGate
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Table 5-6. Unpaved Roads in km for urban and rural areas of Ada and Canyon Counties.<br />
County<br />
Setting<br />
Unpaved Roads<br />
in km<br />
Population in<br />
thousands<br />
Km of Unpaved<br />
Road per 1000<br />
people<br />
Ada Rural 26.1 64.8 0.40<br />
Ada Urban 116 201 0.58<br />
Canyon Rural 20.7 51.4 0.40 a<br />
Canyon Urban 33.4 57.9 0.58 a<br />
a Canyon County estimates of unpaved <strong>road</strong> length per population are based on Ada County data.<br />
Table 5-7. Vehicle Kilometers Traveled on unpaved Roads in rural and urban portions of Canyon County.<br />
Numbers in bold are estimates.<br />
County Urban/Rural Km ADT VKT Ave_Speed mps<br />
Canyon Urban 33.4 120 4,004 11.2<br />
Canyon Rural 20.7 120 2,488 11.2<br />
In addition to the two b<strong>road</strong> categories, “rural” and “urban”, there were unpaved <strong>road</strong>s in Canyon<br />
County that were associated with small rural townships. A list of those is provided in Table 5-8.<br />
Data were only available for the Goldengate Highway District which covers the Wilder and<br />
Greenleaf townships. Based on the total km of <strong>road</strong>s inventoried in the Goldengate townships<br />
(51.3) and the populations of Greanleaf and Wilder (1880), a length of unpaved <strong>road</strong> per unit<br />
population was calculated to be (82.5 km/ 1880) = 0.044 km/person. This ratio was used to<br />
estimate the lengths of unpaved <strong>road</strong>s associated with the townships shown in Table 5-8.<br />
Average daily traffic (ADT) was conservatively estimated as 20 vehicles per day.<br />
Table 5-8. Estimates of km of unpaved <strong>road</strong>s, average daily traffic, and vehicle speeds for small townships in<br />
Canyon County. Numbers in bold are estimates.<br />
Township<br />
1997 Population<br />
Unpaved <strong>road</strong>s<br />
(km)<br />
Average Daily<br />
Traffic<br />
Vehicle<br />
kilometers<br />
traveled<br />
Speed (m/s)<br />
Wilder 1232 55 20 1083 11.2<br />
Greeanleaf 648 29 20 570 11.2<br />
Notus 380 16 20 334 11.2<br />
Parma 1597 71 20 1404 11.2<br />
Middleton 1851 82 20 1627 11.2<br />
Melba 252 11 20 221 11.2<br />
5.2.3 Accounting for precipitation effects on unpaved <strong>road</strong> <strong>dust</strong> emissions<br />
The effect of meteorology on unpaved <strong>road</strong> emissions was considered in terms of ground<br />
snow cover and precipitation. On days when there was snow cover on the ground, unpaved <strong>road</strong><br />
emissions were set to zero. On days when precipitation was observed, the emissions potential for<br />
dry unpaved <strong>road</strong>s was multiplied by 0.079 to obtain emissions. For days immediately after a day<br />
when precipitation was observed, the dry emissions potential was multiplied by 0.35 in order to<br />
arrive at the emissions potential for that day. This treatment of precipitation followed directly<br />
from the results of the TRAKER loop data that were summarized in Chapter 5. The loop data<br />
showed that when the ground was wet, emissions were 7.9% of their dry value. The day after a<br />
precipitation event, emissions were still only 35% of their dry values. The average year, based on<br />
historical data between 1940 and 2000, contains 13.2 days where snow cover is present. For the<br />
purposes of emissions inventories, it was assumed that all these days occur during the winter.<br />
79.6 days per year contain measurable precipitation while there is no snow cover present on the<br />
ground. On 10.6 days out of the year, both precipitation and snow cover are observed. The<br />
breakdown of the various conditions is shown in Table 5-9.<br />
5-10