11.07.2014 Views

treasure valley road dust study: final report - ResearchGate

treasure valley road dust study: final report - ResearchGate

treasure valley road dust study: final report - ResearchGate

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>study</strong> in Las Vegas (Kuhns et al., 2001). Figure 3-23 shows the relationship between TRAKER<br />

measurements (T * ) and manually determined silt loadings (sL) in Las Vegas. Note that the<br />

power-law relationship between sL and T * is the same for both Las Vegas and the Treasure<br />

Valley, namely that sL is equal to T * raised to the 0.47 power. However, the relationship is<br />

stronger in the Las Vegas data (R 2 =0.47) than in the Treasure Valley data (R 2 =0.29). There are<br />

two possible explanations for the difference between the Las Vegas and the Treasure Valley<br />

data. First, it is possible that the <strong>road</strong> dirt in Las Vegas is more uniform in size distribution across<br />

the <strong>valley</strong>. That is, the relationship between 75 ?m <strong>dust</strong> particles (this is the nominal upper limit<br />

of the <strong>dust</strong> particles that are measured using the silt technique) and 10 ?m particles (this is the<br />

upper limit of <strong>dust</strong> particles measured by the TRAKER) is more consistent in Las Vegas than in<br />

the Treasure Valley. Second, the Las Vegas data span a higher range of numbers (approximately<br />

2.8 orders of magnitude) than the Treasure Valley data (approximately 1.6 orders of magnitude).<br />

Perhaps the higher range of numbers in the Las Vegas <strong>study</strong> serves to smooth out the noise in the<br />

relationship between TRAKER signal and silt loading, resulting in a better correlation between<br />

the two.<br />

100<br />

Silt Loading (g/m 2 )<br />

10<br />

1<br />

sL = 1.8321(T*) 0.4715<br />

R 2 = 0.2852<br />

sL = 2.0602(T*)<br />

R 2 = 0.1146<br />

0.1<br />

0.01 0.1 1 10 100<br />

Collocated speed-corrected TRAKER signal (mg/m 3 )<br />

Figure 3-22. Relationship between manually collected silt loadings and the speed-corrected TRAKER signal<br />

in the Treasure Valley Idaho. TRAKER measurements were conducted over the same stretch of <strong>road</strong> where<br />

dirt was subsequently removed by vacuuming for silt analysis. The solid line represents a power law<br />

regression of the data while the dashed line is the linear regression. The low R 2 values for either regression<br />

indicate that the TRAKER signal and silt loadings are only weakly correlated. Silt loadings shown in the<br />

Figure represent samples obtained in both summer and winter 2001. The summer 6 th st. sample has been<br />

omitted.<br />

3-25

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!