treasure valley road dust study: final report - ResearchGate
treasure valley road dust study: final report - ResearchGate
treasure valley road dust study: final report - ResearchGate
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Figure 4-13. Johnston HSD mechanical sweeper.<br />
Once the sand had been swept from sections 1 and 2, the TRAKER vehicle resurveyed<br />
the test sections. TRAKER surveys were repeated at several intervals after the sand was applied<br />
to evaluate how emissions from these different treatments evolve over time.<br />
4.4.1.2 Test Results<br />
Data were reduced by averaging the <strong>road</strong> <strong>dust</strong> PM 10 emissions potential b for each test<br />
section and pass. Data from multiple passes over a test section were averaged together if the<br />
passes were made within 10 minutes of one another.<br />
Figure 4-14 shows the results of the sanding/sweeper tests. Chinden Street (top panel)<br />
was on the TRAKER loop so data from this location was sampled on five different occasions<br />
prior to the experiment. The figures show that prior to the sanding sweeping test, the emissions<br />
potential for the three test sections from each <strong>road</strong> were similar. Emissions potential variation<br />
was less than 10% between the three test sections for both Chinden and Rose Hill/Franklin.<br />
Ten minutes after sand application, no significant change was detected in the emiss ions<br />
potential from the <strong>road</strong> surface with the exception of the vacuum swept portion of Chinden. The<br />
emissions potential from this section dropped from 0.47 to 0.27 (g/vkt)/(m/s). This initial drop in<br />
potential is probably due to moisture on the <strong>road</strong>; the sand applied had an approximate moisture<br />
content of 8% (see Appendix A); the first section on Chinden received the sand that had been<br />
sitting at the bottom of the truck bed and was probably more wetted than sand that was applied<br />
later in the test (i.e on sections 2 and 3).<br />
At 2.5 hours after sand application, the emissions potential had increased at all test<br />
sections with respect to the baseline value prior to sanding. At the Chinden test area, the vacuum<br />
swept section S1 emissions potential increased by 26%, the mechanically swept section S2<br />
emissions potential increased by 42%, and the unswept section S3 emission potential increased<br />
by 46%. At the Rose Hill/Franklin test area; emissions potentials increased 69% on the vacuum<br />
swept section, 63% on the mechanically swept section, 61% on the unswept section.<br />
4-24