treasure valley road dust study: final report - ResearchGate
treasure valley road dust study: final report - ResearchGate
treasure valley road dust study: final report - ResearchGate
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
5.3.3 Comparisons of Road <strong>dust</strong> emissions with prior work and silt loading<br />
Table 5-15 shows an inter-comparison of paved <strong>road</strong> <strong>dust</strong> emissions estimation methods.<br />
In addition to the TRAKER method, four silt loading methods also appear in the table, two from<br />
the current <strong>study</strong>, and two that are based on previous work performed by SAI (1997). The<br />
emissions estimates using silt loading from the current <strong>study</strong> are labeled TVRDS SL1 and<br />
TVRDS SL2. In calculating TVRDS SL1 emissions, the silt loadings <strong>report</strong>ed in Table 3-7 are<br />
used for arterial, collector, and local <strong>road</strong>s. Since <strong>road</strong> vacuuming was not performed on<br />
freeways, no on-site silt loading data were available for interstates. The EPA AP-42 suggested<br />
default value of 0.02 g/m 2 was used for interstates. Equation 3-3 was used to calculate the<br />
emissions factors for the different <strong>road</strong> types based on the silt loading values. Actual emissions<br />
were calculated by applying VMT data from the year 2000 Traffic Demand Model results. The<br />
TVRDS SL2 method differs from the TVRDS SL1 method only in the value used for silt<br />
loadings on freeways. In TVRDS SL2, freeway silt loadings are assumed to be the same as for<br />
arterials, 1.9 g/m 2 for winter conditions and 0.5 g/m 2 for the remainder of the year (non-winter).<br />
The use of these silt loadings in place of the default AP-42 values is probably more realistic<br />
since based on TRAKER measurements, it was observed that emissions factors from freeways<br />
were similar to those from arterial <strong>road</strong>s (see Table 5-5, bottom four entries).<br />
SAI (1997) prepared an emissions inventory for paved and unpaved <strong>road</strong>s using the silt<br />
loading method. The results of that inventory appear in Table 5-15. Since the inventory was<br />
assembled in 1997, year 2000 traffic information was not available and SAI had to project future<br />
VMT. The entry in Table 5-15 entitled “SAI 2000 Equivalent” uses the same silt loading values<br />
that SAI used in the original emissions inventory. However, actual year 2000 Traffic Demand<br />
Model results were used to estimate vkt.<br />
Table 5-15. Inter-comparison of emissions inventory methods for average winter day and average annual<br />
paved <strong>road</strong> <strong>dust</strong> emissions for the year 2000 in the Treasure Valley.<br />
Inventory Method<br />
Average Winter Day Paved Road<br />
Emissions (metric tons/day)<br />
Average Day emissions on<br />
annual basis (metric tons/day)<br />
TVRDS TRAKER 81.2 62.0<br />
TVRDS SL1 (Interstates SL=0.02 g/m 2 ) 58.1 31.3<br />
TVRDS SL2 (Interstates Winter SL =1.9<br />
g/m 2 , Non-winter SL=0.5 g/m 2 )<br />
75.3 40.6<br />
SAI (1995) 32.2 28.1<br />
SAI 2000 Equivalent With Year 2000<br />
TDM Data<br />
35.4 31.2<br />
TVRDS TRAKER = current <strong>study</strong> using TRAKER<br />
TVRDS SL1 = current <strong>study</strong> using local silt data with assumption that interstate silt loading is equal to default EPA value of 0.02 g/m 2<br />
TVRDS SL2 = current <strong>study</strong> using local silt data with assumption that interstate silt loading is same as for arterials with a value of 1.9 g/m 2 for<br />
winter and 0.5 g/m 2 for non-winter days<br />
SAI (1995) = emissions <strong>report</strong>ed in SAI emissions inventory<br />
SAI-2000 Equivalent = Uses same silt loading assumptions as SAI inventory, but actual Traffic Demand Model network for the year 2000 instead<br />
of projection.<br />
For average winter day, paved <strong>road</strong> <strong>dust</strong> emissions using the TRAKER method are 2.3<br />
times those from the SAI 2000 Equivalent method (81.2 vs. 35.4 metric tons per day). The<br />
TRAKER method gives 1.4 times higher emissions compared to the AP-42 method using on-site<br />
silt loadings (TVRDS SL1). However, using the more realistic silt loadings for interstates<br />
(TVRDS SL2), the TRAKER-based emissions of 81.2 tons per day and the AP-42-based<br />
emissions of 76.3 tons per day only differ by 8%.<br />
5-16