11.07.2014 Views

treasure valley road dust study: final report - ResearchGate

treasure valley road dust study: final report - ResearchGate

treasure valley road dust study: final report - ResearchGate

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4.3.2 Meteorological Effects on Unpaved Road Emissions<br />

The TRAKER loop included a 1 km section of private unpaved <strong>road</strong> (Howry) that was<br />

traversed each time the loop was executed. The emissions potential for each day the loop was<br />

executed was averaged over the entire length of the unpaved <strong>road</strong>. The result appears as a time<br />

series in Figure 4-8. The black circles correspond to the emissions potential in [g/vkt/mps]. The<br />

black squares correspond to daily precipitation in mm. The gray line is a time trace of the<br />

relative humidity. Emissions potentials fall into three distinct categories outlined by the gray<br />

boxes: “dry conditions”, “day after rain”, and “wet conditions”. The emissions potentials and<br />

daily precipitation share the same y-axis scale on the left, while the relative humidity uses the<br />

right y-axis scale. During and immediately after a rain event while the relative humidity is still<br />

high (3/3/01), emissions potentials are very low and correspond to “wet conditions”. 24 hours<br />

after a rain event (“day after rain”), when the relative humidity has had a chance to sub side and<br />

the top layers of soil are drying, emissions potentials are higher than under “wet conditions”. 48<br />

hours or more after a rain event, emissions potentials are even higher (“dry conditions”). If we<br />

consider the “dry conditions” as a baseline value, then under wet conditions, emissions are on<br />

average 7.9% of the baseline value and under “day after rain”, emissions are 35% of their<br />

baseline values. This trend seems to hold regardless of the amount of rainfall, though we note<br />

that the range of daily rainfall amounts that were <strong>report</strong>ed for the 2/23/01 to 3/20/01 period was<br />

modest (0.25 mm - 0.77 mm or 0.01 in – 0.03 in).<br />

AP-42 (USEPA, 1999) suggests the approximation that emissions from unpaved <strong>road</strong>s<br />

should be set to zero for all days where the total daily rainfall exceeds 0.25 mm. The results of<br />

the TRAKER loop indicate that in addition to reducing emissions for days when rainfall is<br />

<strong>report</strong>ed, unpaved <strong>road</strong> emissions should also be reduced for the 24-hour period that follows the<br />

day that rainfall was <strong>report</strong>ed. Physically, results from the TRAKER loop suggest that a thin<br />

layer of soil at the surface dries quickly, but that the soil underneath may remain wet for at least<br />

48 hours, considerably reducing the potential for <strong>dust</strong> emissions.<br />

Emissions Potential [g/vkt/mps] Or rainfall in mm<br />

10.00<br />

Dry<br />

Conditions<br />

Day After<br />

Rain<br />

1.00<br />

Wet<br />

conditions<br />

0.10<br />

TRAKER<br />

Rainfall<br />

"RH"<br />

2/23/01 2/28/01 3/5/01 3/10/01 3/15/01 3/20/01<br />

Date<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

Figure 4-8. Plot of emissions potential of unpaved <strong>road</strong> on TRAKER loop, daily precipitation, and relative<br />

humidity. Emissions potentials and rainfall use the left y-axis; relative humidity uses the right y-axis.<br />

4-20

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!