11.07.2014 Views

treasure valley road dust study: final report - ResearchGate

treasure valley road dust study: final report - ResearchGate

treasure valley road dust study: final report - ResearchGate

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 4-3. TRAKER street survey coverages by season, county, and <strong>road</strong> class.<br />

County<br />

Road Class<br />

kilometers<br />

covered with<br />

TRAKER<br />

County<br />

Road Class<br />

kilometers<br />

covered with<br />

TRAKER<br />

Ada Collector 62.0 Ada Collector 65.8<br />

Ada Interstate 41.1 Ada Interstate 47.8<br />

Ada Local/Residential 44.6 Ada Local/Residential 46.3<br />

Ada Minor Arterial 60.9 Ada Minor Arterial 75.7<br />

Ada Principal Arterial 51.9 Ada Principal Arterial 60.1<br />

Ada Unpaved 14.9 Ada Unpaved 18.4<br />

Ada All <strong>road</strong>s 275.4 Ada All <strong>road</strong>s 314.0<br />

Canyon Collector 9.5 Canyon Collector 8.5<br />

Canyon Interstate 30.3 Canyon Interstate 33.4<br />

Canyon Local/Residential 15.3 Canyon Local/Residential 11.3<br />

Canyon Minor Arterial 56.4 Canyon Minor Arterial 43.0<br />

Canyon Principal Arterial 39.9 Canyon Principal Arterial 23.8<br />

Canyon Unpaved 0.0 Canyon Unpaved 0.0<br />

Canyon All <strong>road</strong>s 151.5 Canyon All <strong>road</strong>s 120.1<br />

Ada &<br />

Canyon<br />

Winter<br />

All <strong>road</strong>s 426.9<br />

Ada &<br />

Canyon<br />

Summer<br />

All <strong>road</strong>s 434.1<br />

4.2.1.1 Effect of Speed and VMT<br />

The effect of vehicle speed and the volume of traffic per lane on <strong>road</strong> <strong>dust</strong> emissions<br />

potentials were assessed for all non-residential <strong>road</strong>s. Residential <strong>road</strong>s were not included<br />

because they are not physically represented in the Traffic Demand Model. Therefore, the<br />

associated speeds and traffic volumes were also not available for residentials. It is important to<br />

note that “speed” here refers to the speed attributed to the <strong>road</strong> in the Traffic Demand Model and<br />

not the speed of the TRAKER vehicle itself. The dependence of the emissions potential on<br />

speed and traffic volume was assumed to have the following form:<br />

b<br />

or equivalently,<br />

? x ? y<br />

? CC, S,<br />

T<br />

? s ? v<br />

(4-7)<br />

log( b)<br />

? lCC , S , T<br />

? x?<br />

log( s)<br />

? y?<br />

log( v)<br />

(4-8)<br />

where b is the emissions potential in units of [g/vkt/mps], C C,S,T is a constant that is specific to<br />

the county (Ada or Canyon), setting (urban or rural), and time of year (winter or summer), l C,S,T<br />

is the base 10 logarithm of C C,S,T , s is the <strong>road</strong> speed, v is the number of vehicles per lane per<br />

day, and x and y are positive empirical constants. The form of Eq (4-7) is appealing because as<br />

speed and traffic volume increase, the <strong>road</strong> <strong>dust</strong> emissions potential decreases, a result that is<br />

consistent with physical expectation.<br />

The results of regressions of log(b) vs. log(s) and log(v) are shown in Table 4-4. Three<br />

sets of linear regression results are shown in the Table: Log (b)vs. Log(s) and Log(v) shown as<br />

option 1 in the table, Log(b) vs. Log(s) only shown as option 2 in the table (assumes emissions<br />

potential independent of per lane traffic volume), and Log(b) vs. Log(v) only shown as option 3<br />

in the table (assumes emissions potential independent of <strong>road</strong> speed). For each of the three<br />

4-9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!