16.07.2014 Views

booth gardner - Washington Secretary of State

booth gardner - Washington Secretary of State

booth gardner - Washington Secretary of State

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

In the spring <strong>of</strong> 1987, King County Prosecutor Norm Maleng, a gentlemanly<br />

Republican in the Dan Evans mold, began testing the waters for a race against Gardner.<br />

Party Chairwoman Jennifer Dunn was enthusiastic. Pointing to his tough-on-crime record<br />

and strong social conscience, she called him the “credible” candidate the party had been<br />

hoping for. Fall produced a surprise wild card: Bobby Williams was running, too. Most<br />

observers rated the lawmaker from Longview a long shot against Maleng, a popular<br />

politician from the state’s biggest county.<br />

Gardner and Wilkerson took their tax reform dog-and-pony show on the road almost<br />

every week all winter. Without tax reform, “you’re<br />

dreaming, absolutely dreaming” to think that the<br />

business-and-occupation taxes won’t keep soaring, the<br />

revenue director warned the Association <strong>of</strong> <strong>Washington</strong><br />

Business. To lunch-bucket groups, they declared that the<br />

state’s tax system was patently unfair. With more than<br />

half <strong>of</strong> its revenue generated by the second-highest sales<br />

tax in the nation, <strong>Washington</strong> put the greatest burden on<br />

those least able to pay. Booth said a bipartisan consensus<br />

on tax reform was crucial and emphasized he wasn’t<br />

wedded to an income tax. “My goal is to create a better<br />

business climate.” He said he hoped to submit a plan<br />

to the Legislature in 1989, then to the voters to cap the<br />

state’s centennial year. However, if the Republicans made<br />

it a partisan issue, the governor said he just wouldn’t go<br />

there, and the cause might be set back decades. Maleng<br />

and Williams said that was classic Booth Gardner – vague<br />

details and veiled threats. “I think it’s time he comes up<br />

with a specific proposal and take it to the people and<br />

become a leader,” Maleng said. Gardner was cornered by<br />

reporters a few weeks later and admitted that his personal<br />

preference was an income tax. “See,” said his rivals.<br />

Gardner appointed a 16-member Committee on <strong>Washington</strong>’s Financial Future to<br />

develop a “revenue neutral” tax reform plan – one mean feat – for the 1989 legislative<br />

session. Wilkerson and Dick Davis, the director <strong>of</strong> Financial Management, were named cochairmen.<br />

The panel included the mayors <strong>of</strong> Seattle and Spokane, the superintendent <strong>of</strong><br />

public instruction, representatives <strong>of</strong> business and labor, tax attorneys and accountants.<br />

Senate Republicans would have no part <strong>of</strong> it.<br />

Pollsters hired by both parties sampled the electorate at year’s end and reached<br />

the same conclusion: Voters hated the idea <strong>of</strong> an income tax but loved their governor.<br />

The GOP poll actually rated him higher than the one commissioned by the Democrats –<br />

Booth and Revenue Director Bill Wilkerson take<br />

their tax reform show on the road. Peter Haley ©<br />

The News Tribune (Tacoma, WA) 1989 Reprinted<br />

with permission.<br />

122

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!