16.07.2014 Views

booth gardner - Washington Secretary of State

booth gardner - Washington Secretary of State

booth gardner - Washington Secretary of State

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

case, given modern palliative care and hospice, they said there was no need for anyone<br />

to die in relentless, excruciating pain. One commercial featured a senior citizen who kept<br />

“remembering what that governor in Colorado said about the elderly with terminal illness<br />

have a duty to die” and save the system billions <strong>of</strong> dollars in end-<strong>of</strong>-life health care. Others<br />

said assisted suicide, if passed, was sure to emerge as a cost-containment issue. “Any<br />

number <strong>of</strong> warm and fuzzy and vague euphemisms are used to hide the ugly truth that this<br />

is suicide – physician-assisted suicide,” said Shane Macaulay, a Bellevue radiologist.<br />

“It will not stop here,” warned Sharon Quick, the <strong>Washington</strong> state coordinator for<br />

the American Academy <strong>of</strong> Medical Ethics. “We’ve seen what happened in the Netherlands<br />

… And what about the person who is paralyzed” and unable to place the lethal pills in his<br />

or her mouth? “Isn’t that discrimination not to let them take their own life?” Quick, an<br />

anesthesiologist was an assistant clinical pr<strong>of</strong>essor at the University <strong>of</strong> <strong>Washington</strong> Medical<br />

School.<br />

An Elway Research study commissioned by the <strong>Washington</strong> <strong>State</strong> Medical<br />

Association in 2007 found physicians equally conflicted by the issue. About half <strong>of</strong> the<br />

respondents supported an I-1000 aid-in-dying option for their patients; 42 percent were<br />

opposed. While the poll sampled only 502 <strong>of</strong> the Medical Association’s nearly 7,000<br />

members, Stuart Elway, a respected pollster, said he was confident <strong>of</strong> its accuracy.<br />

Robert Spitzer, the<br />

Jesuit priest who headed<br />

Gonzaga University, argued<br />

passionately against the<br />

initiative. “I’m very much<br />

against it because one person’s<br />

option can become another<br />

person’s duty – the duty to<br />

die.” Vulnerable people could<br />

be sucked into the trap, Spitzer<br />

said – the depressed, those<br />

with low self-esteem, even<br />

“good, strong, stoic people.” Martin Sheen warns that I-1000 is the slippery slope.<br />

Well-meaning relatives could<br />

Courtesy No On I-1000 campaign.<br />

undermine a person’s will to live. And the law could also provide an opening for evil, greedy<br />

ones “who really do wish a person ill. …Whatever it may be, the duty to die looms large and<br />

it will touch the vast majority <strong>of</strong> our population.”<br />

After an early-September Elway poll found 57 percent favoring the initiative, the<br />

opponents called on Hollywood for help and launched a $750,000 TV and radio campaign.<br />

In a compelling 30-second spot, Martin Sheen warned against legalizing assisted suicide.<br />

The award-winning actor was a staunch opponent who volunteered his time. “We have a<br />

175

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!