The FuTure oF nuclear Fuel cycle - MIT Energy Initiative
The FuTure oF nuclear Fuel cycle - MIT Energy Initiative
The FuTure oF nuclear Fuel cycle - MIT Energy Initiative
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
On the other hand, the introduction date of thermal reprocessing in preparation for the<br />
deployment of fast reactors has an appreciable effect in the initial few years after the FR<br />
introduction, as can be seen for the year 2050 in Table 6.11. <strong>The</strong> effect disappears completely<br />
by 2070, and the dynamics of TRU availability takes over after that time. Thus the<br />
trajectories of the installed FR capacity are close for the two cases examined after 2060.<br />
Table 6.11 Fast Reactor’s Installed Capacity for the cCse of 2.5% Growth [GWe]<br />
thermal reproCeSSinG<br />
StartinG year <strong>Fuel</strong> CyCle by 2050 by 2100<br />
2030<br />
2035<br />
Fr cr=0.75 28 248<br />
Fr cr=1.0 32 337<br />
Fr cr=1.23 31 387<br />
Fr cr=0.75 20 259<br />
Fr cr=1.0 23 345<br />
Fr cr=1.23 21 391<br />
Sensitivity to initial core fuel requirements<br />
Since the fuel requirements for the fast reactor breeder were extrapolated from the smaller<br />
design of the ALMR, it is important to assess the effect of possible improvements (i.e. savings<br />
in fuel requirements). Two simulation cases were run for an assumed fuel-saving fast<br />
breeder reactor. <strong>The</strong> new cases with reduced fuel requirements were assumed to require<br />
only half as much as the difference between the ALMR and the CR=1 cases in the side<br />
bar on fast reactors. In the base cases described in the sidebar, a breeder reactor takes 8.64<br />
MT TRU to start as opposed to 6.31MT TRU for the CR=1 case. <strong>The</strong> total heavy metal in<br />
the startup core is 97.31 MTHM instead of 45.5 MTHM in the CR=1 case. <strong>The</strong> reduced<br />
fuel requirements assumed for the sensitivity study are: the breeder needs only 7.47 MT of<br />
TRU in the initial core and only 72 MTHM in the core and blanket. With these assumed<br />
requirements, two cases were run, one keeping the breeding ratio at 1.23, and one assuming<br />
a smaller breeding ratio of only 1.115. Table 6.12 shows the resulting installed fast reactor<br />
capacities in 2050 and 2100 for the base growth case of 2.5% per year.<br />
Table 6.12 Effect of TRU Requirements<br />
on Fast Reactor Installed Capacity For<br />
the growth case of 2.5% per year [GWe]<br />
ConverSion ratio by 2050 by 2100<br />
Fr cr=1 23 345<br />
Fr cr=1.23 21 391<br />
Fr cr=1.23* 25 477<br />
Fr cr=1.115* 25 408<br />
*Breeder cases with reduced fuel requirements<br />
It is clear from the table that by 2050 there would be little change in the installed capacity.<br />
However, by 2100 the installed capacity will increase if the core with reduced requirements<br />
was able to keep the same conversion ratio of 1.23, from 391 to 477 GWe, an increase of<br />
22%. On the other hand, if the reduced fuel requirements led to a decrease in the conver-<br />
chapter 6: analysis of <strong>Fuel</strong> <strong>cycle</strong> options 91