29.07.2014 Views

The FuTure oF nuclear Fuel cycle - MIT Energy Initiative

The FuTure oF nuclear Fuel cycle - MIT Energy Initiative

The FuTure oF nuclear Fuel cycle - MIT Energy Initiative

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> HTRs can be used to provide high-temperature heat to chemical plants, refineries, steel<br />

production, and other industrial applications—markets currently served by fossil fuels and<br />

that are responsible for about 16% of the total greenhouse gas emissions of the U.S. <strong>The</strong><br />

largest high-temperature process heat market are refineries that consume about 7% of the<br />

nation’s total energy demand—about equal to the total energy output of the nation’s existing<br />

<strong>nuclear</strong> power plants.<br />

<strong>The</strong> longer-term incentive for the HTR is its potential for liquid fuels production while<br />

minimizing greenhouse gas releases. Liquid fuels can be produced from oil, natural gas,<br />

oil sands, oil shale, coal, and biomass. However, the less the feedstock resembles gasoline<br />

or diesel fuel, the more energy is required to convert the feedstock into gasoline and diesel<br />

fuel. While the refining of light crude oil consumes ~15% of the crude oil in the refining<br />

process, the energy consumed by a coal liquefaction plant exceeds the energy value of the<br />

gasoline and diesel fuel that is produced. Because we are transitioning from light crude oil<br />

to alternative feedstocks, the carbon dioxide emissions from the production of a gallon of<br />

gasoline or diesel fuel are expected to rise over the next several decades.<br />

If external energy sources are available for refineries, coal liquefaction plants, and biorefineries,<br />

greenhouse gas emissions can be minimized. For biofuels, the availability of external<br />

energy sources for biorefineries determines the contribution of biofuels. It has been estimated<br />

that the U.S. could ultimately produce 1.3 billion tons of renewable biomass per year<br />

without major impacts on food and fiber production. If burned, the energy output would<br />

equal about 10 million barrels of diesel fuel per day. If converted to ethanol, the energy<br />

value of the ethanol would be equivalent to 5 million barrels of diesel per day with most<br />

of the remaining energy used in the biomass-to-fuels production process. If external heat<br />

and/or hydrogen are available, the same biomass could produce about 12 million barrels of<br />

diesel fuel per day. Biofuels have the potential to replace oil in the transport sector but only<br />

if biorefineries have external energy sources. Because plants extract carbon dioxide from<br />

the atmosphere, the use of biofuels does not increase greenhouse gas emissions to the atmosphere<br />

provided that a low-carbon energy source provides the energy to the biorefinery.<br />

Recent reviews (Forsberg 2008) have evaluated the use of <strong>nuclear</strong> energy for liquid fuels<br />

production. Some applications can use lower temperature heat from LWRs but many applications<br />

require high-temperature heat. <strong>The</strong> largest long-term market may be the production<br />

of gasoline and diesel from biomass using high-temperature processing and hydrogen.<br />

Biorefinery processes (Ondrey 2010) today convert only a fraction of the biomass to gasoline<br />

and burn the remaining biomass to provide the heat and hydrogen for the biorefinery.<br />

By replacing the biomass consumed in operating the biorefinery, an HTR could triple fuel<br />

yields per ton of biomass.<br />

teChnoloGy deSCription<br />

<strong>The</strong>re are various designs of HTRs but all use the same basic coated-particle fuel. <strong>The</strong> potentially<br />

unique societal benefits (safety, safeguards and nonproliferation, fissile fuel burning,<br />

and waste-form performance) of HTRs are associated with the characteristics of this<br />

fuel. Potential disadvantages (such as higher fuel manufacturing costs) are also associated<br />

with this fuel.<br />

208 <strong>MIT</strong> STudy on <strong>The</strong> <strong>FuTure</strong> <strong>oF</strong> <strong>nuclear</strong> <strong>Fuel</strong> <strong>cycle</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!