The FuTure oF nuclear Fuel cycle - MIT Energy Initiative
The FuTure oF nuclear Fuel cycle - MIT Energy Initiative
The FuTure oF nuclear Fuel cycle - MIT Energy Initiative
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>The</strong> HTRs can be used to provide high-temperature heat to chemical plants, refineries, steel<br />
production, and other industrial applications—markets currently served by fossil fuels and<br />
that are responsible for about 16% of the total greenhouse gas emissions of the U.S. <strong>The</strong><br />
largest high-temperature process heat market are refineries that consume about 7% of the<br />
nation’s total energy demand—about equal to the total energy output of the nation’s existing<br />
<strong>nuclear</strong> power plants.<br />
<strong>The</strong> longer-term incentive for the HTR is its potential for liquid fuels production while<br />
minimizing greenhouse gas releases. Liquid fuels can be produced from oil, natural gas,<br />
oil sands, oil shale, coal, and biomass. However, the less the feedstock resembles gasoline<br />
or diesel fuel, the more energy is required to convert the feedstock into gasoline and diesel<br />
fuel. While the refining of light crude oil consumes ~15% of the crude oil in the refining<br />
process, the energy consumed by a coal liquefaction plant exceeds the energy value of the<br />
gasoline and diesel fuel that is produced. Because we are transitioning from light crude oil<br />
to alternative feedstocks, the carbon dioxide emissions from the production of a gallon of<br />
gasoline or diesel fuel are expected to rise over the next several decades.<br />
If external energy sources are available for refineries, coal liquefaction plants, and biorefineries,<br />
greenhouse gas emissions can be minimized. For biofuels, the availability of external<br />
energy sources for biorefineries determines the contribution of biofuels. It has been estimated<br />
that the U.S. could ultimately produce 1.3 billion tons of renewable biomass per year<br />
without major impacts on food and fiber production. If burned, the energy output would<br />
equal about 10 million barrels of diesel fuel per day. If converted to ethanol, the energy<br />
value of the ethanol would be equivalent to 5 million barrels of diesel per day with most<br />
of the remaining energy used in the biomass-to-fuels production process. If external heat<br />
and/or hydrogen are available, the same biomass could produce about 12 million barrels of<br />
diesel fuel per day. Biofuels have the potential to replace oil in the transport sector but only<br />
if biorefineries have external energy sources. Because plants extract carbon dioxide from<br />
the atmosphere, the use of biofuels does not increase greenhouse gas emissions to the atmosphere<br />
provided that a low-carbon energy source provides the energy to the biorefinery.<br />
Recent reviews (Forsberg 2008) have evaluated the use of <strong>nuclear</strong> energy for liquid fuels<br />
production. Some applications can use lower temperature heat from LWRs but many applications<br />
require high-temperature heat. <strong>The</strong> largest long-term market may be the production<br />
of gasoline and diesel from biomass using high-temperature processing and hydrogen.<br />
Biorefinery processes (Ondrey 2010) today convert only a fraction of the biomass to gasoline<br />
and burn the remaining biomass to provide the heat and hydrogen for the biorefinery.<br />
By replacing the biomass consumed in operating the biorefinery, an HTR could triple fuel<br />
yields per ton of biomass.<br />
teChnoloGy deSCription<br />
<strong>The</strong>re are various designs of HTRs but all use the same basic coated-particle fuel. <strong>The</strong> potentially<br />
unique societal benefits (safety, safeguards and nonproliferation, fissile fuel burning,<br />
and waste-form performance) of HTRs are associated with the characteristics of this<br />
fuel. Potential disadvantages (such as higher fuel manufacturing costs) are also associated<br />
with this fuel.<br />
208 <strong>MIT</strong> STudy on <strong>The</strong> <strong>FuTure</strong> <strong>oF</strong> <strong>nuclear</strong> <strong>Fuel</strong> <strong>cycle</strong>