29.07.2014 Views

The FuTure oF nuclear Fuel cycle - MIT Energy Initiative

The FuTure oF nuclear Fuel cycle - MIT Energy Initiative

The FuTure oF nuclear Fuel cycle - MIT Energy Initiative

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Stockpiling<br />

If supply interruption (or price run-up faster than interest rates) should become an important<br />

concern, stockpiling of either natural uranium or fuel-ready LEU would not be an<br />

onerous burden, requiring only 200 MT U NAT or 20 MT of 4.5% enriched uranium per GWe<br />

year. <strong>The</strong> latter mass is more than 10 5 smaller than equally potent coal, oil, or natural gas<br />

storage amounts. Hence a strategic uranium reserve could be contemplated.<br />

If one values the current U.S. Strategic Petroleum Reserve of 7.27 × 10 8 barrels (~ 70 days of<br />

imports) at 50 $/bbl, the same investment in natural uranium at 100 $/kg U would support<br />

100 reactors for nearly twenty years. Hence a stockpile a factor of 5 smaller would provide<br />

more than ample protection against short term supply interruption. Alternatively, at about<br />

double the cost per kilogram of natural uranium, one can stockpile 5% enriched uranium.<br />

This reduces the time delay prior to fuel fabrication and reduces the fuel-ready stockpile<br />

mass by a factor of ten. However, the other 90% must still be stored as depleted uranium. As<br />

discussed in Chapter 8, a fuel bank is being developed through the IAEA to provide security<br />

of supply as part of a nonproliferation strategy.<br />

De facto stockpiles of other types are available:<br />

p U.S. enrichment plant tails (in excess of 700,000 metric tons [20] containing about 1400<br />

MT U-235 – enough to support up to 14 LWR reactors for 100 years if fully recovered.<br />

Cheaper uranium enrichment services should eventually permit cost-effective access to<br />

some of this material. World depleted uranium stores are probably comparable.<br />

p U.S. in situ ore reserves are of on the order of 2 x 10 6 MT U NAT (see Table 3.1), not currently<br />

being mined because of cheaper supplies from the international market, principally<br />

Canada. If eventually recovered, these could sustain 100 reactors for 100 years.<br />

p In December 2008 the U.S. DOE announced a program to release for commercial use,<br />

over a period of 25 years, a variety of excess uranium types totaling roughly 60,000 MT<br />

of natural uranium equivalent: i.e., about 300 reactor years’ worth [20].<br />

<strong>The</strong> above considerations buttress the contention that natural uranium resources will not be<br />

a major constraint for the remainder of the 21 st century.<br />

Effects of Weapon Stockpile Reduction [21]<br />

<strong>The</strong> United States and Russia reached an agreement in 1993 to blend down 500 tons of<br />

90% enriched uranium for consumption by U.S. LWRs through 2013. One metric ton of<br />

HEU can sustain a 1 GWe LWR for approximately 1 year. Hence, the 500 tons of HEU can<br />

support five reactors for 100 years – useful but not a major factor when considerably more<br />

than 500 reactors could be operational within a few decades (there are currently about 360<br />

operating LWRs globally).<br />

Russia and the U.S. have retained a stockpile of 600 – 1200 MT of HEU, which could again<br />

easily be absorbed by the world uranium market. IPFM estimates more than 1700 tons total<br />

worldwide. [21]<br />

40 <strong>MIT</strong> STudy on <strong>The</strong> <strong>FuTure</strong> <strong>oF</strong> <strong>nuclear</strong> <strong>Fuel</strong> <strong>cycle</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!