The FuTure oF nuclear Fuel cycle - MIT Energy Initiative
The FuTure oF nuclear Fuel cycle - MIT Energy Initiative
The FuTure oF nuclear Fuel cycle - MIT Energy Initiative
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Stockpiling<br />
If supply interruption (or price run-up faster than interest rates) should become an important<br />
concern, stockpiling of either natural uranium or fuel-ready LEU would not be an<br />
onerous burden, requiring only 200 MT U NAT or 20 MT of 4.5% enriched uranium per GWe<br />
year. <strong>The</strong> latter mass is more than 10 5 smaller than equally potent coal, oil, or natural gas<br />
storage amounts. Hence a strategic uranium reserve could be contemplated.<br />
If one values the current U.S. Strategic Petroleum Reserve of 7.27 × 10 8 barrels (~ 70 days of<br />
imports) at 50 $/bbl, the same investment in natural uranium at 100 $/kg U would support<br />
100 reactors for nearly twenty years. Hence a stockpile a factor of 5 smaller would provide<br />
more than ample protection against short term supply interruption. Alternatively, at about<br />
double the cost per kilogram of natural uranium, one can stockpile 5% enriched uranium.<br />
This reduces the time delay prior to fuel fabrication and reduces the fuel-ready stockpile<br />
mass by a factor of ten. However, the other 90% must still be stored as depleted uranium. As<br />
discussed in Chapter 8, a fuel bank is being developed through the IAEA to provide security<br />
of supply as part of a nonproliferation strategy.<br />
De facto stockpiles of other types are available:<br />
p U.S. enrichment plant tails (in excess of 700,000 metric tons [20] containing about 1400<br />
MT U-235 – enough to support up to 14 LWR reactors for 100 years if fully recovered.<br />
Cheaper uranium enrichment services should eventually permit cost-effective access to<br />
some of this material. World depleted uranium stores are probably comparable.<br />
p U.S. in situ ore reserves are of on the order of 2 x 10 6 MT U NAT (see Table 3.1), not currently<br />
being mined because of cheaper supplies from the international market, principally<br />
Canada. If eventually recovered, these could sustain 100 reactors for 100 years.<br />
p In December 2008 the U.S. DOE announced a program to release for commercial use,<br />
over a period of 25 years, a variety of excess uranium types totaling roughly 60,000 MT<br />
of natural uranium equivalent: i.e., about 300 reactor years’ worth [20].<br />
<strong>The</strong> above considerations buttress the contention that natural uranium resources will not be<br />
a major constraint for the remainder of the 21 st century.<br />
Effects of Weapon Stockpile Reduction [21]<br />
<strong>The</strong> United States and Russia reached an agreement in 1993 to blend down 500 tons of<br />
90% enriched uranium for consumption by U.S. LWRs through 2013. One metric ton of<br />
HEU can sustain a 1 GWe LWR for approximately 1 year. Hence, the 500 tons of HEU can<br />
support five reactors for 100 years – useful but not a major factor when considerably more<br />
than 500 reactors could be operational within a few decades (there are currently about 360<br />
operating LWRs globally).<br />
Russia and the U.S. have retained a stockpile of 600 – 1200 MT of HEU, which could again<br />
easily be absorbed by the world uranium market. IPFM estimates more than 1700 tons total<br />
worldwide. [21]<br />
40 <strong>MIT</strong> STudy on <strong>The</strong> <strong>FuTure</strong> <strong>oF</strong> <strong>nuclear</strong> <strong>Fuel</strong> <strong>cycle</strong>