29.07.2014 Views

The FuTure oF nuclear Fuel cycle - MIT Energy Initiative

The FuTure oF nuclear Fuel cycle - MIT Energy Initiative

The FuTure oF nuclear Fuel cycle - MIT Energy Initiative

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

For the sake of simplicity, we use a single model of a reference 1000 MWe LWR, and assume<br />

a unique set of parameters for the fuel <strong>cycle</strong>. Data about the fuel requirements are taken<br />

from [Hoffman et al., 2005]. In reality, there are many sizes of LWRs, and their fuel <strong>cycle</strong>s<br />

also differ according to their fuel management. Table 6.1 summarizes the characteristics<br />

of interest for the reference LWR (scaled to a 1000 MWe unit) as well as all other reactors<br />

considered in this study.<strong>The</strong> sidebar describes the fuel details (fuel compositions, mass flow<br />

rates, etc.) used in the analysis.<br />

Table 6.1 Characteristics of <strong>The</strong> Reference Power Plants<br />

plant and CyCle deSCription<br />

liGht Water<br />

reaCtorS<br />

FaSt breeder<br />

reaCtor<br />

FaSt burner reaCtor<br />

<strong>The</strong>rmal Power (MWt) 2,966 2,632 2,632<br />

<strong>The</strong>rmal efficiency 33.7% 38% 38%<br />

electrical output (MWe) 1000 1000 1,000<br />

conversion ratio 0.6 1.23 0.0 0.5 0.75 1.0<br />

<strong>cycle</strong> length (eFPd) 1 500 700 132 2 221 2 232 2 370<br />

average number of batches 3 3 (+ blankets) 8.33 5.82 5.95 3.41<br />

average irradiation time (eFPd) 1,500 1,785 (2380 for the 1,099 1,286 1,380 1,262<br />

blankets)<br />

discharge Burn up (MWd/kghM) 50 103.23 293.9 131.9 99.6 73.0<br />

notes<br />

1. eFPd: effective Full Power days. 2. <strong>Fuel</strong> <strong>cycle</strong> lengths less than about a year are not attractive for utilities, as they require<br />

frequent refueling and limit the capacity factor.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Twice-Through <strong>Fuel</strong> Cycle (single pass MOX in thermal reactors)<br />

LWRs may be fueled with Mixed Oxide (MOX) assemblies. MOX is a mixture of Plutonium/Americium<br />

1 oxide (PuO 2 /AmO 2 ) and depleted (or natural) uranium oxide (UO 2 ).<br />

Unlike uranium, plutonium can be found in only trace quantities in nature, but is formed<br />

in reactors. About half of the plutonium produced in a LWR is fissioned in that reactor<br />

(typically contributing about one fourth of the energy produced over the irradiation of a<br />

UO 2 batch), or decays in situ. However, a significant amount (typically about 1% w of the<br />

total heavy metal) remains in the discharged spent UO 2 fuel.<br />

Hence, the twice-through <strong>cycle</strong> (denoted TTC) is intrinsically a limited recycling scheme.<br />

After a minimum cooling time, the fuel discharged from UO 2 fueled LWRs is sent to reprocessing<br />

plants where both the uranium (which typically constitutes 99% w of the heavy metal<br />

in used UO 2 fuel) and the plutonium are extracted. <strong>The</strong> minor actinides are sent along<br />

with the fission products to interim storage for ultimate disposal.<strong>The</strong> plutonium is sent<br />

to MOX fabrication plants (possibly co-located with the reprocessing plant) for MOX pin<br />

fabrication.MOX assemblies are then loaded in LWRs for electricity production. Depending<br />

on the capability of the reactor and the policy choice, the core can be fully loaded with<br />

MOX assemblies, or only partially loaded (typically 30%). In the latter case, the remainder<br />

is constituted of traditional UO 2 assemblies. Very few of the existing U.S reactors, so-called<br />

Generation II reactors, are licensed to be loaded with MOX assemblies.<br />

chapter 6: analysis of <strong>Fuel</strong> <strong>cycle</strong> options 73

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!