The FuTure oF nuclear Fuel cycle - MIT Energy Initiative
The FuTure oF nuclear Fuel cycle - MIT Energy Initiative
The FuTure oF nuclear Fuel cycle - MIT Energy Initiative
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
For the sake of simplicity, we use a single model of a reference 1000 MWe LWR, and assume<br />
a unique set of parameters for the fuel <strong>cycle</strong>. Data about the fuel requirements are taken<br />
from [Hoffman et al., 2005]. In reality, there are many sizes of LWRs, and their fuel <strong>cycle</strong>s<br />
also differ according to their fuel management. Table 6.1 summarizes the characteristics<br />
of interest for the reference LWR (scaled to a 1000 MWe unit) as well as all other reactors<br />
considered in this study.<strong>The</strong> sidebar describes the fuel details (fuel compositions, mass flow<br />
rates, etc.) used in the analysis.<br />
Table 6.1 Characteristics of <strong>The</strong> Reference Power Plants<br />
plant and CyCle deSCription<br />
liGht Water<br />
reaCtorS<br />
FaSt breeder<br />
reaCtor<br />
FaSt burner reaCtor<br />
<strong>The</strong>rmal Power (MWt) 2,966 2,632 2,632<br />
<strong>The</strong>rmal efficiency 33.7% 38% 38%<br />
electrical output (MWe) 1000 1000 1,000<br />
conversion ratio 0.6 1.23 0.0 0.5 0.75 1.0<br />
<strong>cycle</strong> length (eFPd) 1 500 700 132 2 221 2 232 2 370<br />
average number of batches 3 3 (+ blankets) 8.33 5.82 5.95 3.41<br />
average irradiation time (eFPd) 1,500 1,785 (2380 for the 1,099 1,286 1,380 1,262<br />
blankets)<br />
discharge Burn up (MWd/kghM) 50 103.23 293.9 131.9 99.6 73.0<br />
notes<br />
1. eFPd: effective Full Power days. 2. <strong>Fuel</strong> <strong>cycle</strong> lengths less than about a year are not attractive for utilities, as they require<br />
frequent refueling and limit the capacity factor.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Twice-Through <strong>Fuel</strong> Cycle (single pass MOX in thermal reactors)<br />
LWRs may be fueled with Mixed Oxide (MOX) assemblies. MOX is a mixture of Plutonium/Americium<br />
1 oxide (PuO 2 /AmO 2 ) and depleted (or natural) uranium oxide (UO 2 ).<br />
Unlike uranium, plutonium can be found in only trace quantities in nature, but is formed<br />
in reactors. About half of the plutonium produced in a LWR is fissioned in that reactor<br />
(typically contributing about one fourth of the energy produced over the irradiation of a<br />
UO 2 batch), or decays in situ. However, a significant amount (typically about 1% w of the<br />
total heavy metal) remains in the discharged spent UO 2 fuel.<br />
Hence, the twice-through <strong>cycle</strong> (denoted TTC) is intrinsically a limited recycling scheme.<br />
After a minimum cooling time, the fuel discharged from UO 2 fueled LWRs is sent to reprocessing<br />
plants where both the uranium (which typically constitutes 99% w of the heavy metal<br />
in used UO 2 fuel) and the plutonium are extracted. <strong>The</strong> minor actinides are sent along<br />
with the fission products to interim storage for ultimate disposal.<strong>The</strong> plutonium is sent<br />
to MOX fabrication plants (possibly co-located with the reprocessing plant) for MOX pin<br />
fabrication.MOX assemblies are then loaded in LWRs for electricity production. Depending<br />
on the capability of the reactor and the policy choice, the core can be fully loaded with<br />
MOX assemblies, or only partially loaded (typically 30%). In the latter case, the remainder<br />
is constituted of traditional UO 2 assemblies. Very few of the existing U.S reactors, so-called<br />
Generation II reactors, are licensed to be loaded with MOX assemblies.<br />
chapter 6: analysis of <strong>Fuel</strong> <strong>cycle</strong> options 73