The FuTure oF nuclear Fuel cycle - MIT Energy Initiative
The FuTure oF nuclear Fuel cycle - MIT Energy Initiative
The FuTure oF nuclear Fuel cycle - MIT Energy Initiative
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Repository Engineering<br />
All repositories for SNF disposal plan to use long-lived waste package designed to last thousands<br />
to hundreds of thousands of years. Because radioactivity decays with time (Figure<br />
5A.1) the waste package can provide a significant barrier to radionuclide release when the<br />
hazard is the greatest and enable the wastes to be retrieved if a problem is found in the performance<br />
of the repository.<br />
SNF and HLW generate significant decay heat that could raise repository temperatures sufficiently<br />
to accelerate degradation of the waste, waste package and geology with degradation<br />
of repository performance. This has several implications.<br />
p Repository temperatures are controlled by limiting the decay heat per waste package<br />
(that is, the quantity of SNF and HLW in each package) and spreading out the waste<br />
packages over a large underground area. Decay heat is conducted from the waste through<br />
the waste package and the rock ultimately to the earth’s surface.<br />
p Repository cost and size is partly dependent upon total SNF and HLW decay heat. <strong>The</strong><br />
greater the total heat load, the larger the number of waste packages and the more tunnels<br />
that must be constructed to spread the SNF and HLW over a large area. For the proposed<br />
YM repository, about 40 tons of SNF can be emplaced per acre of repository space. This<br />
implies about 50 acres of repository are needed to dispose of a year’s production of SNF<br />
in the U.S (~2000 tons).<br />
p Repository programs have adopted a policy of storing SNF and HLW for 40 to 60 years<br />
before disposal to reduce decay heat and thus reduce repository costs and performance<br />
uncertainties. Engineering tradeoffs determine storage times. After the first decade, the<br />
fission products strontium-90 ( 90 Sr) and cesium-137 ( 137 Cs) produce most of the decay<br />
heat. <strong>The</strong>se radionuclides have 30-year half-lives and thus the radioactivity and decay<br />
heat drops in half every 30 years. After ~50 years, the transuranic isotope 241 Am becomes<br />
the dominant source of decay heat in SNF with a half life of 470 years before decaying to<br />
Neptunium-237 ( 237 Np). <strong>The</strong> decay heat per fuel assembly initially decreases at a rapid<br />
rate and then slows down when the decay heat is controlled by 241 Am. This occurs 40 to<br />
60 years after SNF discharge—the technical basis for the storage time.<br />
Repository capacities are not limited by waste volume or mass. For some wastes there are<br />
incentives to increase waste volumes to improve repository performance. For example, liquid<br />
HLW is converted into HLW glass for disposal. 11 This increases waste volumes by a<br />
factor of three to four compared to calcining the waste; but, glass is a superior waste form<br />
with lower handling risks and is less soluble in water—resulting in better repository performance.<br />
Economics is not a major repository engineering constraint. <strong>The</strong> cost of geological disposal<br />
of HLW and SNF is a small fraction of the cost of <strong>nuclear</strong> electricity—typically a few percent<br />
of the cost of electricity.<br />
160 <strong>MIT</strong> STudy on <strong>The</strong> <strong>FuTure</strong> <strong>oF</strong> <strong>nuclear</strong> <strong>Fuel</strong> <strong>cycle</strong>