Chapter 7 Appendix — Economics deFinition <strong>oF</strong> the levelized CoSt <strong>oF</strong> eleCtriCity (lCoe) <strong>The</strong> methodology for calculating of the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) for the Once- Through Cycle is by now a very familiar standard one. <strong>The</strong> methodology for fuel <strong>cycle</strong>s with recycling is less familiar and not yet standardized. <strong>The</strong> difficulty arises because one output from one reactor becomes an input to another reactor—either separated plutonium in the Twice-Through Cycle or separated transuranics in the Fast Reactor Re<strong>cycle</strong>. If there were an easily observable market price for these separated products, then it would be straightforward to use the same methodology employed for the Once-Through Cycle, adjusting the calculation to recognize the different outputs or inputs in a system with recycling and valuing these new inputs and outputs at this market price. However, since recycling is not yet a widely used technology, there is not yet a reliably quoted market price for these re<strong>cycle</strong>d products. We can, instead, impute to them a value based on the cost of separating the products and their value as re<strong>cycle</strong>d fuel. How to do this imputation is what has not yet become familiar or standardized. This appendix lays out the methodology we employed together with some of the rationale. A fuller case for the methodology and comparison with other methods used in other studies is provided in an on-line research report. 1 Table 7A.1 provides a list of the key variables used in this Appendix. <strong>The</strong> Once-Through Cycle <strong>The</strong> LCOE for the traditional, Once-Through Cycle is the formula: (7A.1) where C t denotes the full set of realized costs at each date t∈[A,B], Q t denotes the time profile of electricity produced at each date t∈[A,B], and R denotes the continuously compounded discount rate. 2 <strong>The</strong> costs include all costs from the purchase of the raw ore, the fabrication of the fuel, construction and operation of the <strong>nuclear</strong> reactor, and finally the disposal of the spent fuel. 3 appendix to chapter 7: economics 167
table 7a.1 list of variables , 1 lcoe for the once-Through <strong>cycle</strong>; onCe-throuGh CyCle f 1 , 1 = f 1 + k 1 + m 1 + d 1 front-end fuel cost, levelized in mill/kWh; f 1 = u 1 + b 1 k 1 reactor capital cost, inclusive of future maintenance, capital expenditures and decommissioning costs, levelized in mill/kWh; m 1 non-fuel operating and maintenance cost, levelized in mill/kWh; d 1 cost of disposal of spent uoX fuel, including the cost of interim storage and geologic repository, levelized in mill/kWh; u 1 cost of the raw uranium, levelized in mill/kWh; b 1 enrichment, conversion and fabrication cost for uoX, levelized in mill/kWh; tWiCe-throuGh CyCle , 2 lcoe for the Twice-Through <strong>cycle</strong>; , 2,1 (p) lcoe for the first reactor in the <strong>cycle</strong>, i.e, the reactor burning fresh fuel and sending its spent fuel for reprocessing; this is a function of the value attributed to the separated plutonium, p; , 2,1 (p) = f 2,1 + k 2,1 + m 2,1 + d 2,1 (p) f 2,1 front-end fuel cost for the first reactor in the <strong>cycle</strong>, levelized in mill/kWh; k 2,1 reactor capital cost for the first reactor in the <strong>cycle</strong>, levelized in mill/kWh; m 2,1 non-fuel operating and maintenance cost for the first reactor in the <strong>cycle</strong>, levelized in mill/kWh; cost of disposal of spent fuel, including the cost of reprocessing, disposal of high level wastes and credits for the separated uranium and plutonium, levelized in mill/kWh; d 2,1 (p) = s 2,1 + w 2,1 − u 2,1B − z 2,1 (p) s 2,1 reprocessing cost, inclusive of interim storage for the separated streams and of low and intermediate-level waste disposal, levelized in mill/kWh; w 2,1 high level waste disposal cost, levelized in mill/kWh; u 2,1 credit for the separated uranium, levelized in mill/kWh; z 2,1 (p) credit for the separated plutonium, levelized in mill/kWh; , 2,2 (p) lcoe for the second reactor in the <strong>cycle</strong>, i.e, the reactor burning re<strong>cycle</strong>d fuel; this is a function of the value attributed to the separated plutonium, p; , 2,2 (p) = f 2,2 (p) + k 2,2 + m 2,2 + d 2,2 f 2,2 (p) front-end fuel cost for the first reactor in the <strong>cycle</strong>, levelized in mill/kWh; this is a function of the value attributed to the separated plutonium, p, used to fabricate the fuel; k 2,2 m 2,2 d 2,2 u 2,2 z 2,2 (p) b 2,2 p f 2,2 (p) = u 2,2 + z 2,2 (p) + b 2,2 reactor capital cost for the second reactor in the <strong>cycle</strong>, levelized in mill/kWh; non-fuel operating and maintenance cost for the second reactor in the <strong>cycle</strong>, levelized in mill/kWh; cost of disposal of spent MoX fuel, levelized in mill/kWh; cost of purchasing depleted uranium used in fabricated the re<strong>cycle</strong>d fuel, levelized in mill/kWh; cost of purchasing the separated plutonium used for fabricating the re<strong>cycle</strong>d fuel, levelized in mill/kWh; cost of fabricating the re<strong>cycle</strong>d fuel, levelized in mill/kWh; value attributed to the separated plutonium, $/kg; variable is solved for in deriving the two lcoes, , 2,1 (p) and , 2,2 (p); continued next page 168 <strong>MIT</strong> STudy on <strong>The</strong> <strong>FuTure</strong> <strong>oF</strong> <strong>nuclear</strong> <strong>Fuel</strong> <strong>cycle</strong>
- Page 3 and 4:
Other Reports in This Series The Fu
- Page 5 and 6:
MIT Nuclear Fuel Cycle Study Adviso
- Page 7 and 8:
vi MIT STudy on The FuTure oF nucle
- Page 9 and 10:
viii MIT STudy on The FuTure oF nuc
- Page 11 and 12:
Study Findings and Recommendations
- Page 13 and 14:
Recommendation We recommend that a
- Page 15 and 16:
p Innovative nuclear energy applica
- Page 17 and 18:
p In line with many of our R&D reco
- Page 19 and 20:
The “once through” or open fuel
- Page 21 and 22:
have been implemented slowly. This
- Page 23 and 24:
Recommendation We recommend that th
- Page 25 and 26:
oped policies for specific wastes r
- Page 27 and 28:
nuClear Fuel CyCleS The united Stat
- Page 29 and 30:
- The primary differences were in t
- Page 31 and 32:
Recommendation Integrated system st
- Page 33 and 34:
Table 1.2 Summary of R&D Recommenda
- Page 35 and 36:
18 MIT STudy on The FuTure oF nucle
- Page 37 and 38:
the once-through Fuel Cycle for lig
- Page 39 and 40:
tricity costs. Waste management cos
- Page 41 and 42:
Figure 2.3 partial recycle of lWr S
- Page 43 and 44:
history of the nuclear Fuel Cycle B
- Page 45 and 46:
• What is the impact of timing of
- Page 47 and 48:
nuclear fuel cycles, the wastes (SN
- Page 49 and 50:
Because ore demand is closely coupl
- Page 51 and 52:
eStimatinG Future CoStS oF uranium
- Page 53 and 54:
Figure 3.3 relative uranium Cost vs
- Page 55 and 56:
Figure 3.4 100 year price trend for
- Page 57 and 58:
Stockpiling If supply interruption
- Page 59 and 60:
CitationS and noteS 1. Uranium 2007
- Page 61 and 62:
If SNF is to be shipped, typically
- Page 63 and 64:
a policy that maintains fuel cycle
- Page 65 and 66:
Dry cask storage is used for short
- Page 67 and 68:
For decommissioned sites, our econo
- Page 69 and 70:
with its attractiveness of jobs and
- Page 71 and 72:
54 MIT STudy on The FuTure oF nucle
- Page 73 and 74:
2. The United States should create
- Page 75 and 76:
Table 5.1 United States Waste Class
- Page 77 and 78:
table 5.3 examples of operational G
- Page 79 and 80:
Waste Isolation Pilot Plant The uni
- Page 81 and 82:
Successful repository programs are
- Page 83 and 84:
designed with limited SNF storage c
- Page 85 and 86:
CitationS and noteS 1. A Handbook f
- Page 87 and 88:
70 MIT STudy on The FuTure oF nucle
- Page 89 and 90:
energy spectrum centered at higher
- Page 91 and 92:
light Water reactor Fuel technical
- Page 93 and 94:
(fertile-free) to CR=1.0 (break-eve
- Page 95 and 96:
license. However, fuel reprocessing
- Page 97 and 98:
Figure 6.4 densification Factors as
- Page 99 and 100:
As expected, the breeder installed
- Page 101 and 102:
Figure 6.8 shows the development of
- Page 103 and 104:
Table 6.8 Uranium Cost in $/kg, Sta
- Page 105 and 106:
Figure 6.11 location of the tru inv
- Page 107 and 108:
SenSitivity analySiS: alternative a
- Page 109 and 110:
Fast reactor technical Characterist
- Page 111 and 112:
cooled fast reactor (SFR) fueled by
- Page 113 and 114:
Summary oF ConCluSionS Among the in
- Page 115 and 116:
[hoffman et al., 2006] e.a. hoffman
- Page 117 and 118:
This chapter reports the cost of th
- Page 119 and 120:
Table 7.1 Input Parameter Assumptio
- Page 121 and 122:
Twice-Through Cycle Table 7.3 shows
- Page 123 and 124:
Table 7.4 The LCOE for the Fast Rea
- Page 125 and 126:
higher cost of disposal of the spen
- Page 127 and 128:
110 MIT STudy on The FuTure oF nucl
- Page 129 and 130:
power program might be used, as is
- Page 131 and 132:
Figure 8.1 Weapons-usability Charac
- Page 133 and 134: inStitutional approaCheS to Fuel Cy
- Page 135 and 136: the iaea additional protocol an Iae
- Page 137 and 138: in technology innovation are likely
- Page 139 and 140: Reprocessing choices Commercial rep
- Page 141 and 142: Table 8.2 Safeguard Technical Objec
- Page 143 and 144: 126 MIT STudy on The FuTure oF nucl
- Page 145 and 146: port for nuclear power over the per
- Page 147 and 148: Those Americans who have an opinion
- Page 149 and 150: who are very concerned with global
- Page 151 and 152: p Waste management must be integrat
- Page 153 and 154: options because we do not know toda
- Page 155 and 156: Nuclear Security. Nonproliferation
- Page 157 and 158: There have been major changes in ou
- Page 159 and 160: There are large financial and polic
- Page 161 and 162: Figure 3A.2 shows the results. As c
- Page 163 and 164: Figure A.3 plots Eq (2), where adva
- Page 165 and 166: Again, assuming that q = 0.29, the
- Page 167 and 168: Note that Eq. [7] suggests employin
- Page 169 and 170: Figure 3b.1 Cumulative probability
- Page 171 and 172: 154 MIT STudy on The FuTure oF nucl
- Page 173 and 174: Figure 5a.1 decay of radioactivity
- Page 175 and 176: and 241 Am. For the short term, hea
- Page 177 and 178: Repository Engineering All reposito
- Page 179 and 180: epreSentative repoSitory deSiGnS: u
- Page 181 and 182: orehole diSpoSal There are three me
- Page 183: 166 MIT STudy on The FuTure oF nucl
- Page 187 and 188: The Twice-Through Cycle The LCOE fo
- Page 189 and 190: A proper representation of the chai
- Page 191 and 192: In the Twice-Through Cycle, the pai
- Page 193 and 194: table 7a.2 once-through Fuel Cycle
- Page 195 and 196: above ground storage. However, the
- Page 197 and 198: CitationS and noteS 1. The methodol
- Page 199 and 200: Historically, the interest in thori
- Page 201 and 202: p Analogous to plutonium. Plutonium
- Page 203 and 204: In case self-protection of U-232 da
- Page 205 and 206: Figure a.3 Schematic view of Sbu an
- Page 207 and 208: 190 MIT STudy on The FuTure oF nucl
- Page 209 and 210: eaCtor teChnoloGieS Nuclear power e
- Page 211 and 212: via 239 Pu and 240 Pu, and then the
- Page 213 and 214: urnups, but the gap between the nec
- Page 215 and 216: (~700°C) with higher thermal-to-el
- Page 217 and 218: There are several unique consequenc
- Page 219 and 220: performance goals can be achieved.
- Page 221 and 222: is that it will be many decades bef
- Page 223 and 224: system [1]. The nuclear power plant
- Page 225 and 226: The HTRs can be used to provide hig
- Page 227 and 228: [http://nextgenerationnuclearplant.
- Page 229 and 230: CitationS and noteS Brinkmann, H. U
- Page 231 and 232: The analysis is based on the assump
- Page 233 and 234: considerations discussed above. We
- Page 235 and 236:
In our analysis we make the explici
- Page 237 and 238:
Figure d.4 transmutation Consequenc
- Page 239 and 240:
Figure d.5 breeder Consequences LWR
- Page 241 and 242:
facilities. These concerns are the
- Page 243 and 244:
Technological applicability Geologi
- Page 245 and 246:
It must be noted, that net risks an
- Page 247 and 248:
p Once-through fast reactor fuel. T
- Page 249 and 250:
Table E.1 Recycling Plant Functions
- Page 251 and 252:
Table E.3 Conventional Fuel Fabrica
- Page 253 and 254:
eactor. A summary of inputs from in
- Page 255 and 256:
this page intentionally left blank
- Page 257:
this page intentionally left blank