29.07.2014 Views

The FuTure oF nuclear Fuel cycle - MIT Energy Initiative

The FuTure oF nuclear Fuel cycle - MIT Energy Initiative

The FuTure oF nuclear Fuel cycle - MIT Energy Initiative

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 5 Appendix — Waste Management<br />

prinCipleS <strong>oF</strong> WaSte manaGement<br />

Radioactive waste, like any other forms of waste, is the residual product from the operation<br />

of a facility. Its potential impact on the public and the environment depends on its physical,<br />

chemical and radionuclide characteristics. <strong>The</strong>se characteristics determine risk and establish<br />

a recommended disposition path for the material.<br />

For any hazardous waste, there are only three waste management options: destruction<br />

(transformation to a less hazardous substance), dilution to acceptably low concentrations<br />

in the environment, or isolation from mankind and the biosphere for a period commensurate<br />

with the longevity of the hazard. <strong>The</strong> primary method for management of radioactive<br />

wastes is isolation. <strong>The</strong> isolation should be long enough such that if and when the radioactive<br />

residues eventually re-appear in the biosphere, they will be present at concentrations<br />

low enough to satisfy some health-based dose acceptance criteria.<br />

This waste management strategy is a consequence of the defining characteristic of radioactive<br />

materials—they decay to non-radioactive elements over time. For example, radioactive<br />

cobalt-60 has a half-life of ~5 years. With a half-life of 5 years, half the cobalt-60 decays<br />

away to stable nickel-60 in 5 years. In another 5 years, half of the remaining cobalt-60 decays<br />

away. <strong>The</strong> process continues until all the cobalt-60 is gone. Most radioactive wastes<br />

contain mixtures of different radioactive isotopes where the characteristics of the longerlived<br />

radionuclides usually determine the preferred disposal option. Figure 5A.1 shows the<br />

SNF radioactivity versus time after discharge from the reactor.<br />

For any radioactive waste, the waste isolation technology chosen depends upon the half-life<br />

of the radionuclide, geochemical mobility, and radiotoxicity. For radionuclides with halflives<br />

of a few days or less, such as some medical wastes, the waste may be stored in a cabinet<br />

or closet at the facility until the radionuclides have decayed to very low concentrations. For<br />

longer-lived wastes, the disposal (storage) facility must isolate the waste for longer periods<br />

of time.<br />

WaSte Generation<br />

Different fuel <strong>cycle</strong>s generate different waste streams. Table 5A.1 lists wastes from the open<br />

and closed fuel <strong>cycle</strong>s. <strong>The</strong> United States has an open fuel <strong>cycle</strong>. Several countries (France,<br />

Japan, etc.) re<strong>cycle</strong> fissile materials back to reactors.<br />

appendix to chapter 5: Waste Management 155

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!