29.07.2014 Views

The FuTure oF nuclear Fuel cycle - MIT Energy Initiative

The FuTure oF nuclear Fuel cycle - MIT Energy Initiative

The FuTure oF nuclear Fuel cycle - MIT Energy Initiative

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Twice-Through Cycle<br />

Table 7.3 shows the levelized cost for the Twice-Through Cycle. In the Twice-Through Cycle<br />

raw uranium is first fabricated into uranium-oxide fuel (UOX) for use in a light water reactor.<br />

This is called the first pass of the fuel in a reactor. <strong>The</strong>n the spent fuel is reprocessed, and<br />

plutonium, whether in isolation or mixed with uranium, is fabricated into a mixed-oxide<br />

fuel (MOX) for reuse in a light water reactor. This is called the second pass of the fuel in a<br />

reactor. Of course, the MOX fuel forms only a part of the fuel core of the second reactor.<br />

<strong>The</strong> table shows the levelized cost for both: lines [1]-[11] detail the LCOE for the first pass,<br />

the UOX fuel in a light water reactor, while lines [12]-[19] detail the LCOE for the second<br />

pass, the MOX fuel in a light water reactor.<br />

For the first pass reactor burning fresh UOX fuel, the front-end fuel costs, reactor costs and<br />

non-fuel operating and maintenance costs are identical to those for the Once-Through Cycle—lines<br />

[1]-[5]. However, the back-end fuel <strong>cycle</strong> costs are different since the spent fuel<br />

is sent for reprocessing. <strong>The</strong> costs of reprocessing the spent UOX fuel are included as a part<br />

of the back-end fuel <strong>cycle</strong> cost for the first pass—line [6]. <strong>The</strong> reprocessing produces three<br />

streams: uranium, plutonium and high level waste. <strong>The</strong> high level waste contains the fission<br />

products, minor actinides and impurities. <strong>The</strong> cost of disposing of this high level waste<br />

stream is included as a part of the back-end fuel <strong>cycle</strong> cost for the first pass—line [7]. A<br />

credit for the value of the recovered uranium, which can be used in the fabrication of fresh<br />

UOX fuel, is included as a part of the back-end fuel <strong>cycle</strong> cost for the first pass—line [8].<br />

<strong>The</strong> size of this credit is determined by the price of raw uranium for which the reprocessed<br />

uranium is a substitute, and the differential cost of fabricating UOX from reprocessed uranium.<br />

<strong>The</strong> analysis also requires a credit for the value of the recovered plutonium which will<br />

be used to fabricate MOX fuel for the second pass—line [9]. Since the MOX fuel is used to<br />

produce electricity that substitutes for electricity produced with UOX fuel, the size of the<br />

credit will be such that the LCOE for the first pass and the LCOE for the second pass are<br />

exactly equal—i.e., line [11] will equal line [19]. Line [20] shows this credit measured as a<br />

price per unit of plutonium, $ -15,734/kg. Line [9] shows this credit measured as a value<br />

per unit of electricity, $ -0.14 mill/kWh. <strong>The</strong> fact that the price of the separated plutonium<br />

is negative, as is the credit obtained by the first reactor, implies that the first reactor pays<br />

for the plutonium to be taken away. <strong>The</strong> total back-end fuel <strong>cycle</strong> cost for the first pass is<br />

2.87 mill/kWh—line [10]. This is a much higher cost of disposal than in the Once-Through<br />

Cycle.<br />

<strong>The</strong> total levelized cost for the first pass reactor in the Twice-Through Cycle is 85.38 mill/<br />

kWh, which is higher than in the Once-Through Cycle. <strong>The</strong> difference between the two is<br />

entirely due to the higher cost of disposing of the spent fuel by reprocessing as opposed to<br />

sending the complete spent fuel package directly to a repository.<br />

For the second pass reactor burning MOX fuel, the front-end fuel cost is composed of the<br />

purchase of depleted uranium, a credit for taking the separated plutonium, and the cost of<br />

fabricating the MOX fuel. <strong>The</strong>se items are shown in lines [12]-[14] and the total is shown<br />

in line [15]. This second pass has a much lower front-end fuel <strong>cycle</strong> cost than the first<br />

pass—3.02 mill/kWh as opposed to 7.11 mill/kWh for the first pass. This is primarily due to<br />

the fact that the second pass reactor owner will be paid to take the separated plutonium. <strong>The</strong><br />

payment equals 4.39 mill/kWh—line [13]—and is a significant help in offsetting the high<br />

cost of fabricating the MOX fuel. <strong>The</strong> levelized reactor capital and operating costs—lines<br />

[16] and [17]—are exactly the same whether the reactor is burning UOX fuel or MOX fuel.<br />

104 <strong>MIT</strong> STudy on <strong>The</strong> <strong>FuTure</strong> <strong>oF</strong> <strong>nuclear</strong> <strong>Fuel</strong> <strong>cycle</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!