The FuTure oF nuclear Fuel cycle - MIT Energy Initiative
The FuTure oF nuclear Fuel cycle - MIT Energy Initiative
The FuTure oF nuclear Fuel cycle - MIT Energy Initiative
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Twice-Through Cycle<br />
Table 7.3 shows the levelized cost for the Twice-Through Cycle. In the Twice-Through Cycle<br />
raw uranium is first fabricated into uranium-oxide fuel (UOX) for use in a light water reactor.<br />
This is called the first pass of the fuel in a reactor. <strong>The</strong>n the spent fuel is reprocessed, and<br />
plutonium, whether in isolation or mixed with uranium, is fabricated into a mixed-oxide<br />
fuel (MOX) for reuse in a light water reactor. This is called the second pass of the fuel in a<br />
reactor. Of course, the MOX fuel forms only a part of the fuel core of the second reactor.<br />
<strong>The</strong> table shows the levelized cost for both: lines [1]-[11] detail the LCOE for the first pass,<br />
the UOX fuel in a light water reactor, while lines [12]-[19] detail the LCOE for the second<br />
pass, the MOX fuel in a light water reactor.<br />
For the first pass reactor burning fresh UOX fuel, the front-end fuel costs, reactor costs and<br />
non-fuel operating and maintenance costs are identical to those for the Once-Through Cycle—lines<br />
[1]-[5]. However, the back-end fuel <strong>cycle</strong> costs are different since the spent fuel<br />
is sent for reprocessing. <strong>The</strong> costs of reprocessing the spent UOX fuel are included as a part<br />
of the back-end fuel <strong>cycle</strong> cost for the first pass—line [6]. <strong>The</strong> reprocessing produces three<br />
streams: uranium, plutonium and high level waste. <strong>The</strong> high level waste contains the fission<br />
products, minor actinides and impurities. <strong>The</strong> cost of disposing of this high level waste<br />
stream is included as a part of the back-end fuel <strong>cycle</strong> cost for the first pass—line [7]. A<br />
credit for the value of the recovered uranium, which can be used in the fabrication of fresh<br />
UOX fuel, is included as a part of the back-end fuel <strong>cycle</strong> cost for the first pass—line [8].<br />
<strong>The</strong> size of this credit is determined by the price of raw uranium for which the reprocessed<br />
uranium is a substitute, and the differential cost of fabricating UOX from reprocessed uranium.<br />
<strong>The</strong> analysis also requires a credit for the value of the recovered plutonium which will<br />
be used to fabricate MOX fuel for the second pass—line [9]. Since the MOX fuel is used to<br />
produce electricity that substitutes for electricity produced with UOX fuel, the size of the<br />
credit will be such that the LCOE for the first pass and the LCOE for the second pass are<br />
exactly equal—i.e., line [11] will equal line [19]. Line [20] shows this credit measured as a<br />
price per unit of plutonium, $ -15,734/kg. Line [9] shows this credit measured as a value<br />
per unit of electricity, $ -0.14 mill/kWh. <strong>The</strong> fact that the price of the separated plutonium<br />
is negative, as is the credit obtained by the first reactor, implies that the first reactor pays<br />
for the plutonium to be taken away. <strong>The</strong> total back-end fuel <strong>cycle</strong> cost for the first pass is<br />
2.87 mill/kWh—line [10]. This is a much higher cost of disposal than in the Once-Through<br />
Cycle.<br />
<strong>The</strong> total levelized cost for the first pass reactor in the Twice-Through Cycle is 85.38 mill/<br />
kWh, which is higher than in the Once-Through Cycle. <strong>The</strong> difference between the two is<br />
entirely due to the higher cost of disposing of the spent fuel by reprocessing as opposed to<br />
sending the complete spent fuel package directly to a repository.<br />
For the second pass reactor burning MOX fuel, the front-end fuel cost is composed of the<br />
purchase of depleted uranium, a credit for taking the separated plutonium, and the cost of<br />
fabricating the MOX fuel. <strong>The</strong>se items are shown in lines [12]-[14] and the total is shown<br />
in line [15]. This second pass has a much lower front-end fuel <strong>cycle</strong> cost than the first<br />
pass—3.02 mill/kWh as opposed to 7.11 mill/kWh for the first pass. This is primarily due to<br />
the fact that the second pass reactor owner will be paid to take the separated plutonium. <strong>The</strong><br />
payment equals 4.39 mill/kWh—line [13]—and is a significant help in offsetting the high<br />
cost of fabricating the MOX fuel. <strong>The</strong> levelized reactor capital and operating costs—lines<br />
[16] and [17]—are exactly the same whether the reactor is burning UOX fuel or MOX fuel.<br />
104 <strong>MIT</strong> STudy on <strong>The</strong> <strong>FuTure</strong> <strong>oF</strong> <strong>nuclear</strong> <strong>Fuel</strong> <strong>cycle</strong>