29.07.2014 Views

The FuTure oF nuclear Fuel cycle - MIT Energy Initiative

The FuTure oF nuclear Fuel cycle - MIT Energy Initiative

The FuTure oF nuclear Fuel cycle - MIT Energy Initiative

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 9 — American Attitudes about<br />

Nuclear Power and Nuclear Waste 1<br />

Public attitudes toward <strong>nuclear</strong> power have shaped the federal and local policies concerning<br />

siting and construction of new <strong>nuclear</strong> plants and the development of interim and longterm<br />

waste storage facilities. <strong>The</strong> collapse of public support nationwide for <strong>nuclear</strong> power<br />

following Three Mile Island as well as local opposition to specific facilities is one factor<br />

contributing to the weak growth in this industry over the past 30 years.<br />

Since 2002, the <strong>MIT</strong> energy studies have gauged public understanding of and attitudes toward<br />

<strong>nuclear</strong> power and other energy sources. <strong>The</strong>se studies are random sample surveys of<br />

adults in the United States, conducted in 2002, 2003, 2006, 2007, and 2009, over the Internet<br />

by Knowledge Networks. <strong>The</strong> 2002 and 2007 surveys go into the greatest depth about <strong>nuclear</strong><br />

power and more extensive analyses of these surveys as well as data are available through<br />

the <strong>MIT</strong> CANES 2 and <strong>MIT</strong> Political Science Department 3 . <strong>The</strong> 2007 study replicates much<br />

of the 2002 survey, which is presented in the report <strong>The</strong> Future of Nuclear Power. <strong>The</strong> 2009<br />

survey contains a smaller battery of questions focused on waste disposal and to get the<br />

most current reading on attitudes toward construction of new <strong>nuclear</strong> plants. <strong>The</strong>se surveys<br />

replicate questions asked by earlier surveys, some dating as far back as 1973. This allows us<br />

to extend the time series of public opinion surveys on <strong>nuclear</strong> power, especially questions<br />

concerning waste, safety, and expansion of <strong>nuclear</strong> power. In addition, the surveys include<br />

new items in order to examine the bases for public support.<br />

Of particular interest is whether growing concern about global warming might lead to<br />

greater support for <strong>nuclear</strong> power. Addressing this question requires including measures<br />

of concern about global warming as well as support for <strong>nuclear</strong> power in the same survey<br />

as well as measures of other concerns that might explain the overall attitude an individual<br />

has toward <strong>nuclear</strong> power. <strong>The</strong>se other factors include cost of electricity production using<br />

<strong>nuclear</strong> power, possible local environmental risks, likelihood of an accident, and concerns<br />

about waste storage. This chapter focuses on what these surveys reveal about overall support<br />

for <strong>nuclear</strong> power and its connection to public concern about waste storage.<br />

Support For buildinG neW nuClear poWer plantS<br />

To begin with, some background. A series of public opinion surveys establish a clear trend<br />

of declining public support for building additional <strong>nuclear</strong> power plants from the mid 1970s<br />

through 2000. <strong>The</strong> surveys were conducted by various organizations 4 , especially Cambridge<br />

<strong>Energy</strong> Research Associates (CERA) and Gallup, asking the question “Do you support or<br />

oppose building new <strong>nuclear</strong> power plants?” 5 <strong>The</strong> trend shows a precipitous drop in sup-<br />

chapter 9: american attitudes about <strong>nuclear</strong> Power and <strong>nuclear</strong> Waste 127

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!