01.10.2014 Views

Download - HDTV Magazine

Download - HDTV Magazine

Download - HDTV Magazine

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

I have tested the 3 Blu-ray output versions of 1080p24fps film content (as 1080i,<br />

1080p60fps, and direct 1080p24fps) and there is a clear difference between them,<br />

easier to recognize in large screens, and it is detectable in casual viewing not just in<br />

lab type conditions.<br />

Because most of the TV consumer market does not have a way to handle 24fps<br />

without video processing conversions, the HD DVD market might be putting its bets<br />

on the logic that consumers will "keep on upgrading to the next model".<br />

High quality HT enthusiasts have waited very long for pre-recorded Hi-Def media,<br />

and would appreciate the 24fps feature. They most probably are the early adopters<br />

paying the first players at high prices ($1000+) so a format can be established and<br />

the R&D bills can be paid for newer and better models.<br />

However, Toshiba has apparently stop implementing heavy subsidizing on their<br />

stand-alone players to kill the price and establish their format based on volume,<br />

because it has introduced a player with the $1000 price point similar to Blu-ray.<br />

Toshiba is showing the real price of this technology in 2006/7.<br />

Unfortunately, even at the high price, Toshiba still ignores the quality 1080p24fps<br />

feature on their hi-end player. The true war begins now. A war of quality and merits<br />

without free lunches.<br />

I am not including the video game consoles on these comments because both<br />

formats have killed the prices to compete in that world. This is about stand-alone<br />

players.<br />

If you have a front projector, a large screen, and a quality HT that handles 1080p<br />

24fps properly, you owe it to yourself to get a 24fps capable player.<br />

If you do not, or you do not have a scaler dealing with 24fps at higher quality<br />

processing than the player, you probably would never notice a difference and might<br />

ignore my comments in making your selection based on that feature.<br />

Audio Claims<br />

Players on both formats claimed different capabilities regarding optional multichannel<br />

audio internal decoders, some do DTS-HD but no Dolby TrueHD, and some<br />

do Dolby TrueHD but only as two-channel, the minimum HD DVD standard<br />

requirement.<br />

Some are suited with HDMI 1.3 for streaming out the new hi-bit DTS/Dolby multichannel<br />

soundtrack for external decoding using a suited A/V receiver (when they are<br />

introduced in the near future).<br />

Some are suited with just HDMI 1.1 or 1.2, which would only be able to stream out<br />

DTS HD, but not DTS Master Audio, Dolby Digital Plus, or Dolby True-HD. Those can<br />

only be transported over HDMI 1.3 version that can handle the higher bit/protocol<br />

requirements.<br />

275

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!