DMZ ì¼ì ìí ííì ê´ë¦¬ë¥¼ ìí êµì ì»¨í¼ë°ì¤ - ì ë¤ì¤ì½íêµììí

More documents

Recommendations

Info

DMZ 일원 생태ㆍ평화적 관리를 위한 국제컨퍼런스 is difficult as is accessing external funding due to the political isolation of DPRK. Specific areas of support included: • Management planning: Strong interest in seeking support to prepare and implement effective management plans for protected areas with an emphasis on Biosphere Reserves. • World Heritage: DPRK was an early signatory to the WH Convention and has one cultural property but as yet no natural or mixed properties inscribed. • Red Listing of threatened species: A national level Red List was prepared in 2005 however, it is understood this was done without reverence to the accepted IUCN Red Listing processes. There is a need to peer review the 2005 Red List to assess its credibility and to support preparation of a revised national Red List. • Marine & Coastal Protected Areas: Interest in developing a new MCPA in the Ryongsupo area in South Hwanghae Province southwest of Pyongyang. • Deforestation: Support is needed to address the impacts of serious deforestation on cleared hillsides due to clearing for fuel wood harvesting and other uses. • Climate change: support needed to address climate change impacts and opportunities through REDD+ • Wetlands: The DPRK has taken positive steps to establish many wetland protected areas and is aware of the East Asia Australasia Flyway Partnership which supports migratory bird habitat. Support is required for enhanced conservation and management of wetlands. Ironically this visit also confirmed that the DPRK’s current position is one of not wantingtoengageonanyissuesrelatedtoconservation or Peace Parks in the DMZ. All of the above suggests that any effort to work with DPRK on a Peace Park between Kumgang-san and Seorak-san will need to be carefully and slowly nurtured. Figure 1 below illustrates how a parallel approach might be developed wherein IUCN could broker collaboration when and asappropriate. This would entail working to develop protected area capacity generally in DPRK whilst at the same time preparing a more complete readiness strategy for ROK. An adaptive approach to bring the two sides together would be needed based on the dynamic geopolitical situation. 90 ❙ DMZ 일원의 생태⋅평화⋅지역발전
International Conference on Conservation and Peaceful Use of the Korea DMZ Fig 1 Nature, Peace and Local Development ❙ 91
Page 3 and 4:
❑ DMZ 일원 생태ㆍ평화적
Page 5 and 6:
International Conference on Conserv
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13:
기조발제 Keynote Speech
Page 16 and 17:
DMZ 일원 생태ㆍ평화적 관
Page 18 and 19:
TRANSBOUNDARY CONSERVATION AND ITS
Page 20 and 21:
Page 22 and 23:
Page 24 and 25:
Page 27 and 28:
말로티 드래캔스버그 접경
Page 29 and 30:
THE MALOTI DRAKENSBERG TRANSFRONTIE
Page 31 and 32:
코스타리카, 라 아미스타
Page 33 and 34:
La Amistad International Park, Cost
Page 35 and 36:
워터톤 빙하 국립공원 - 최
Page 37 and 38:
관리/ 행정적 경계를 뛰어
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT BEYOND ADMI
Page 43 and 44: International Conference on Conserv
Page 45: 2 세션 Session 2
Page 48 and 49: DMZ 일원 생태ㆍ평화적 관
Page 54 and 55: Hanbando Eco-Peace Park Strengtheni
Page 63 and 64: DMZ 일원의 현명한 이용과
Page 67 and 68: Wise Use of the Korean DMZ Areas an
Page 77 and 78: Encouraging plan for local developm
Page 79: International Conference on Conserv
Page 83 and 84: DMZ 보전과 현명한 이용을
Page 93: FindingCommonGroundBetweenthe Two K
Page 101 and 102: Suggestions for bilateral cooperati
Page 105: International Conference on Conserv
show all

DMZ ì¼ì ìí ííì  ê´ë¦¬ë¥¼ ìí êµ­ì ì»¨í¼ë°ì¤ - ì ë¤ì¤ì½íêµ­ììí

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?

DMZ ì¼ì ìí ííì ê´ë¦¬ë¥¼ ìí êµì ì»¨í¼ë°ì¤ - ì ë¤ì¤ì½íêµììí