27.10.2014 Views

View publication - Chartered Institute of Housing

View publication - Chartered Institute of Housing

View publication - Chartered Institute of Housing

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PART TWO: LEADING TOMORROW<br />

How Fabrick are gearing up to deliver on the sustainable<br />

neighbourhoods agenda over the next 5-10 years<br />

By Allison Joynes, Organisation Development Manager, Fabrick Group<br />

Summary<br />

The housing industry is facing unprecedented change. Aligned with an<br />

economic climate <strong>of</strong> continued uncertainty and the withdrawing <strong>of</strong> many key<br />

services at a local level, it is perhaps understandable that some <strong>of</strong> our peers<br />

are retrenching their positions and refocusing their activities on core housing<br />

activities at a time when the needs <strong>of</strong> our customers are increasing. Fabrick,<br />

however, have taken a different view. We have acknowledged that there are a<br />

number <strong>of</strong> external factors that will directly impact upon our ability to deliver<br />

services at a level <strong>of</strong> quality that our residents deserve. We have taken account<br />

<strong>of</strong> that within our business plans, but, we have also recognised that there are<br />

many ways in which we can work in partnership with agencies in our<br />

neighbourhoods to ensure that we are making the best use <strong>of</strong> assets and the<br />

best use <strong>of</strong> the resources that are available. This can best be described as our<br />

approach to financial viability whilst also demonstrating the need to evidence<br />

social value outcomes and supporting sustainable neighbourhoods.<br />

Preparing for change<br />

As we prepared for the potential impact <strong>of</strong> welfare reform, knowing we had a good<br />

relationship with our local authority partners who were also about to lose resources, we<br />

took an honest look at how we delivered services to our neighbourhoods and the<br />

difference we were actually making. The structure, that had stood us in good stead as a<br />

social housing provider, was formed around housing management. We had housing<br />

managers supported by housing <strong>of</strong>ficers supported by administration staff. As such, and<br />

by default, the service had become process driven, acting reactively rather than<br />

proactively to demands placed upon it by customers. In fact, a systems thinking project<br />

confirmed that we were managing by exception and therefore only really providing a<br />

service to 20 per cent <strong>of</strong> our customers – those who either came to us, or whom we<br />

visited as a result <strong>of</strong> an tenancy issue (not paying rent and/ or housing benefit not in<br />

place, anti-social behaviour etc.) Proactive steps had to be taken to ensure that our<br />

structure was configured so the main focus <strong>of</strong> all staff working within neighbourhoods<br />

134

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!