Abstracts available here - Society for Conservation Biology
Abstracts available here - Society for Conservation Biology
Abstracts available here - Society for Conservation Biology
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
25th International Congress <strong>for</strong> <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Biology</strong> • Auckland, New Zealand • 5-9 December 2011<br />
agricultural productivity. The social and biodiversity benefits of protected<br />
areas fully justify additional support and funding <strong>for</strong> conservation,<br />
including payments <strong>for</strong> ecosystem services and new REDD+ mechanisms.<br />
2011-12-07 16:45 Comparing environmental per<strong>for</strong>mance of organic<br />
and integrated management kiwifruit orchards<br />
MACLEOD, CJ*, Landcare Research;<br />
Organic farming is often promoted as a solution <strong>for</strong> counteracting the<br />
adverse impacts of agricultural intensification on biodiversity. However, it<br />
is unclear whether the biodiversity benefits derived from organic farming<br />
require an adoption of organic farming in its entirety (i.e. a systems-level<br />
approach) or whether the benefits derived are due to just a small subset of<br />
the associated management practices. Using data collected from kiwifruit<br />
orchards in New Zealand, we assess whether orchards managed under an<br />
organic system support enhanced biodiversity and soil quality than those<br />
under integrated management systems. We then test whether variation in<br />
specific land management practices among kiwifruit orchards better predicts<br />
biodiversity and soil quality than overall differences in management system,<br />
to determine whether environmental gains can also be achieved on nonorganic<br />
orchards. We conclude with a power analysis investigating whether<br />
our current study design has the power to detect significant changes in<br />
environmental per<strong>for</strong>mance.<br />
2011-12-07 16:30 Landscape composition and scale determine<br />
butterfly richness in gardens: evidence from citizen-scientist garden<br />
counts in Belgium<br />
Maes, D*, Research Institute <strong>for</strong> Nature and Forest (INBO;<br />
Vanreusel, W, Natuurpunt; Van Dyck, H, UCL;<br />
Butterflies are among the best-known invertebrates by the general public.<br />
Making use of this social basis, the largest volunteer nature organisation<br />
in Belgium, organised monthly garden butterfly counts since 2007.<br />
To do so, volunteer citizen-scientists observed 19 easily recognisable<br />
and common butterflies species in their gardens. In total, 1140 gardens<br />
were counted in which almost 92000 individuals were observed. We<br />
analyzed the effect of both structural (area of 8 different land use types)<br />
and functional (composition and number of patches of land use types)<br />
landscape heterogeneity on butterfly species richness in gardens at 5<br />
different spatial scales (radius 500-2500m). The smallest spatial scale<br />
(radius 500m) best explained the variation in the number of species in<br />
the gardens. Species richness was highest in gardens surrounded by a large<br />
total area of unfragmented semi-natural biotopes and a low area of densely<br />
build-on areas. Additionally, we examined the effect of the amount and the<br />
configuration of biotopes beyond 500m on butterfly species richness. A<br />
positive effect was observed <strong>for</strong> the number of deciduous woodland patches<br />
>1ha in the ring between 500- 1000m and <strong>for</strong> the area of meadows in<br />
the ring of 1000-1500m, while a negative effect of the number of densely<br />
build-on patches in the ring of 2000-2500m was demonstrated. In a next<br />
stage, we will also focus on the gardens characteristics itself and on the<br />
interaction between garden and the surrounding landscape.<br />
2011-12-08 18:30 Temporal change in the butterfly fauna in three<br />
wards of western Tokyo, Japan, and relevant ecological factors<br />
Maezumi, T*, Institute of Agricultural and Life Science, The<br />
University of Tokyo; Suda, S, Institute of Agricultural and Life<br />
Science, The University of Tokyo; Kadoya, T, National Insutitute <strong>for</strong><br />
Environmental Studies; Izumi, W, Institute of Agricultural and Life<br />
Science, The University of Tokyo;<br />
We constructed a butterfly database using records collected by citizen<br />
scientists during the period from 1923 to 2008 in the three westernmost<br />
wards of Tokyo, Japan. Using the database, we examined the temporal<br />
change in the butterfly fauna in the area and analyzed the contribution<br />
of nine ecological traits to the difference between two periods: 1923-1960<br />
(past) and 1982-2008 (recent). Of the 66 species recorded in the past, 16<br />
species had disappeared in the recent period. Logistic regression showed<br />
that the disappearance was significantly associated with three ecological<br />
traits: univoltine (P