28.10.2014 Views

Abstracts available here - Society for Conservation Biology

Abstracts available here - Society for Conservation Biology

Abstracts available here - Society for Conservation Biology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

25th International Congress <strong>for</strong> <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Biology</strong> • Auckland, New Zealand • 5-9 December 2011<br />

major habitat types. The effectiveness of each zone to protect different<br />

parts of the coral reef ecosystem was determined through an expert based<br />

workshop. We compared potential priority areas <strong>for</strong> several different<br />

scenarios, each with different zone effectiveness values and number of<br />

zones. We found that the area required <strong>for</strong> MPAs differs between scenarios.<br />

If zone effectiveness is ignored we would overestimate the ability of MPAs<br />

to achieve conservation goals. Also, considering the contribution of nationwide<br />

fishing restriction towards meeting conservation goals could lead to<br />

an overly optimistic assessment. Our results also support to step by step<br />

MPA planning, starting with simple designs. Our results will be shared<br />

with stakeholders from across the four provinces of the Vatu-i-Ra seascape<br />

to discuss the viability of such a management scheme as part of the Fiji<br />

National Coastal Plan.<br />

2011-12-08 18:30 Responses in soil chemistry and vegetation to soil<br />

perturbation implemented as a restoration measure in decalcified sandy<br />

grassland<br />

Ödman, AM*, Department of <strong>Biology</strong>, Lund University;<br />

Mårtensson LM, Department of <strong>Biology</strong>, Lund University; Sjöholm<br />

C, Department of <strong>Biology</strong>, Lund University; Olsson PA, Department<br />

of <strong>Biology</strong>, Lund University;<br />

The species-rich communities of xeric sand calcareous grassland are gradually<br />

disappearing due to land use changes. Experimental soil perturbations<br />

(deep and shallow) were per<strong>for</strong>med in degenerated sandy grassland and<br />

the hypothesis that soil perturbation decrease nutrient availability, increase<br />

calcium levels and selects <strong>for</strong> desirable species was tested. An additional<br />

study of the seed bank and seed rain of target species was per<strong>for</strong>med, which<br />

revealed that most species were lacking from the seed bank and spread<br />

their seeds only short distances. Increased pH and calcium concentration,<br />

and decreased nitrogen and phosphorus availability, showed that deep<br />

perturbation was successful in restoring the soil chemistry to levels similar<br />

to those of the target habitat. The vegetation did not yet show much of<br />

a positive response, which could be attributed to the lack of seed bank<br />

and seed rain from target species. In conclusion, deep perturbation may be<br />

a successful method of reversing acidification and nutrient enrichment in<br />

calcareous grasslands but it must either be combined with seeding, or one<br />

will have to wait many years be<strong>for</strong>e the seed rain may introduce the target<br />

species.<br />

2011-12-07 10:30 Turkey’s globally important biodiversity in crisis<br />

Çağan H. Şekercioğlu*, Department of <strong>Biology</strong>, University of<br />

Utah, 257 South 1400 East, Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0840, USA;<br />

Sean Anderson, Environmental Science and Resource Management<br />

Program, 1 University Drive, Cali<strong>for</strong>nia State University Channel<br />

Islands, Camarillo, CA 93012, USA; Erol Akçay, National Institute<br />

<strong>for</strong> Mathematical and Biological Synthesis (NIMBioS), University of<br />

Tennessee, 1534 White Ave Suite 400 Knoxville, TN 37996, USA ;<br />

Raşit Bilgin, Institute of Environmental Sciences, Boğaziçi University,<br />

Bebek, Istanbul, 34342, TURKEY;<br />

Turkey (Türkiye in Turkish) is the only country in the world mostly<br />

covered by three biodiversity hotspots (Caucasus, Irano-Anatolian,<br />

Mediterranean). Turkey’s position at the nexus of Europe, the Middle<br />

East, Central Asia and Africa, its mountains and its encirclement by three<br />

seas have resulted in high terrestrial, fresh water, and marine biodiversity.<br />

However, our scientific knowledge of Turkey’s biodiversity and associated<br />

conservation challenges is insufficient, mainly due to limited research and<br />

language barriers. Addressing this gap is especially relevant today because<br />

the important biodiversity of Turkey is facing severe and growing threats,<br />

especially from business interests and the government. Turkey ranks 140th<br />

out of 163 countries in biodiversity and habitat conservation. As one of<br />

the earliest loci of human civilization, Turkey has experienced millennia<br />

of human activities that have degraded the original ecosystems on land<br />

and sea. Although Turkey’s total <strong>for</strong>est area increased by 5.9% since 1973,<br />

other important habitats such as endemic-rich Mediterranean chapparal,<br />

grasslands, coastal areas, wetlands, and rivers are disappearing, and rampant<br />

erosion is degrading steppes and rangelands. Current development-focused<br />

policies, particularly regarding water use, threaten to eliminate much of<br />

what remains. Development, dam construction, draining wetlands, and<br />

irrigation are the most widespread threats. The first goal of this paper is<br />

to broadly survey what is known about Turkey’s biodiversity, and identify<br />

the areas w<strong>here</strong> more research is needed. Our second goal is to identify<br />

the conservation challenges that Turkey is facing today and highlight<br />

the potential to preserve Turkey’s remaining biodiversity. Achieving this<br />

potential requires immediate action, international attention, and greater<br />

support <strong>for</strong> Turkey’s developing conservation capacity, and the expansion of<br />

a nascent Turkish conservation ethic.<br />

2011-12-09 15:15 Managing gene flow in species with fragmented<br />

distributions<br />

Ballou, J*, Smithsonian <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Biology</strong> Institute, Washington,<br />

DC, USA;<br />

The genetic consequences of population fragmentation continues to be one<br />

of the most significant challenges in conservation genetics. Fragmented<br />

populations experience loss of genetic diversity, accumulation of inbreeding,<br />

genetic divergence and evolution through genetic drift as opposed to<br />

natural selection, t<strong>here</strong>by reducing these populations’ evolutionary<br />

potential. It is well recognized that alleviating these adverse genetic effects<br />

requires re-establishing gene flow between fragments. Yet how this is<br />

best accomplished, particularly in populations with multiple fragments,<br />

is a complex issue requiring answers to many questions such as: Which<br />

individuals to migrate? How many individuals? How often? Between which<br />

fragments? When should gene flow begin? When it should be ceased? One<br />

approach to answering some of these questions is to model changes in the<br />

genetic structure of the population over its fragmentation history. These<br />

models can provide estimates of the relative degrees of inbreeding in the<br />

fragments, and genetic divergence between fragments, which can then be<br />

used to develop plans <strong>for</strong> maximizing the benefits of gene flow. Here we<br />

use this approach to propose gene flow strategies <strong>for</strong> two species: the tule<br />

elk (Cervus elaphus nannodes) in Cali<strong>for</strong>nia, and the golden lion tamarin<br />

(Leontopithecus rosalia) in Brazil.<br />

2011-12-06 14:00 A framework, methods and tools <strong>for</strong> integrating<br />

social considerations in marine spatial planning<br />

Ban, NC*, James Cook University;<br />

Recent marine planning and conservation literature emphasizes the<br />

importance of social considerations to improve success of implementation<br />

and long-term outcomes. In general, the rationale <strong>for</strong> integrating<br />

social considerations is that resulting plans and management actions<br />

are more likely to achieve their goals through improved compliance<br />

when stakeholders, including planners and scientists, are engaged in the<br />

planning process, and when management actions reflect more nuanced<br />

understandings of human behaviour and decision-making. Several bodies<br />

of knowledge outside of marine planning focus on the intricate links<br />

between ecosystems and people, rejecting the premise that they can be<br />

usefully viewed in complete isolation from one another. In particular, the<br />

social-ecological systems framework provides a lens <strong>for</strong> examining social<br />

considerations in marine spatial planning. Linking the social-ecological<br />

systems framework with a systematic approach to marine spatial planning<br />

promises to allow <strong>for</strong> more complete integration of social considerations<br />

in planning. It also opens the door to a vast array of relevant methods and<br />

tools from the social sciences that can improve how social considerations,<br />

including meaningful participation of actors, are addressed.<br />

2011-12-06 15:15 Bayesian decision networks applied to management<br />

of multiple stressors in coral reefs<br />

Ban, S*, ARC Centre of Excellence <strong>for</strong> Coral Reef Studies;<br />

Bayesian decision networks are an emerging tool in the management of<br />

complex, multi-stakeholder planning processes. They enable decision<br />

makers to solicit input and preferences from experts and non-experts alike<br />

through the use of subjective or qualitative knowledge and preferences<br />

about costs, threats, and values. Beyond weighting network/model<br />

parameters, stakeholder input may also drive the structure of the model<br />

itself. Decision networks also facilitate the evaluation of alternative scenarios<br />

based on factors such as stakeholder preferences and uncertainty about<br />

ecosystem responses. The management of coral reef ecosystems provides<br />

an ideal opportunity to employ Bayesian decision networks, particularly<br />

given the complexity and uncertainty associated with multiple stressor<br />

interactions, and the requirement to incorporate both terrestrial and marine<br />

management and stakeholder components. Here I provide an example of<br />

9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!