Abstracts available here - Society for Conservation Biology
Abstracts available here - Society for Conservation Biology
Abstracts available here - Society for Conservation Biology
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
25th International Congress <strong>for</strong> <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Biology</strong> • Auckland, New Zealand • 5-9 December 2011<br />
major habitat types. The effectiveness of each zone to protect different<br />
parts of the coral reef ecosystem was determined through an expert based<br />
workshop. We compared potential priority areas <strong>for</strong> several different<br />
scenarios, each with different zone effectiveness values and number of<br />
zones. We found that the area required <strong>for</strong> MPAs differs between scenarios.<br />
If zone effectiveness is ignored we would overestimate the ability of MPAs<br />
to achieve conservation goals. Also, considering the contribution of nationwide<br />
fishing restriction towards meeting conservation goals could lead to<br />
an overly optimistic assessment. Our results also support to step by step<br />
MPA planning, starting with simple designs. Our results will be shared<br />
with stakeholders from across the four provinces of the Vatu-i-Ra seascape<br />
to discuss the viability of such a management scheme as part of the Fiji<br />
National Coastal Plan.<br />
2011-12-08 18:30 Responses in soil chemistry and vegetation to soil<br />
perturbation implemented as a restoration measure in decalcified sandy<br />
grassland<br />
Ödman, AM*, Department of <strong>Biology</strong>, Lund University;<br />
Mårtensson LM, Department of <strong>Biology</strong>, Lund University; Sjöholm<br />
C, Department of <strong>Biology</strong>, Lund University; Olsson PA, Department<br />
of <strong>Biology</strong>, Lund University;<br />
The species-rich communities of xeric sand calcareous grassland are gradually<br />
disappearing due to land use changes. Experimental soil perturbations<br />
(deep and shallow) were per<strong>for</strong>med in degenerated sandy grassland and<br />
the hypothesis that soil perturbation decrease nutrient availability, increase<br />
calcium levels and selects <strong>for</strong> desirable species was tested. An additional<br />
study of the seed bank and seed rain of target species was per<strong>for</strong>med, which<br />
revealed that most species were lacking from the seed bank and spread<br />
their seeds only short distances. Increased pH and calcium concentration,<br />
and decreased nitrogen and phosphorus availability, showed that deep<br />
perturbation was successful in restoring the soil chemistry to levels similar<br />
to those of the target habitat. The vegetation did not yet show much of<br />
a positive response, which could be attributed to the lack of seed bank<br />
and seed rain from target species. In conclusion, deep perturbation may be<br />
a successful method of reversing acidification and nutrient enrichment in<br />
calcareous grasslands but it must either be combined with seeding, or one<br />
will have to wait many years be<strong>for</strong>e the seed rain may introduce the target<br />
species.<br />
2011-12-07 10:30 Turkey’s globally important biodiversity in crisis<br />
Çağan H. Şekercioğlu*, Department of <strong>Biology</strong>, University of<br />
Utah, 257 South 1400 East, Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0840, USA;<br />
Sean Anderson, Environmental Science and Resource Management<br />
Program, 1 University Drive, Cali<strong>for</strong>nia State University Channel<br />
Islands, Camarillo, CA 93012, USA; Erol Akçay, National Institute<br />
<strong>for</strong> Mathematical and Biological Synthesis (NIMBioS), University of<br />
Tennessee, 1534 White Ave Suite 400 Knoxville, TN 37996, USA ;<br />
Raşit Bilgin, Institute of Environmental Sciences, Boğaziçi University,<br />
Bebek, Istanbul, 34342, TURKEY;<br />
Turkey (Türkiye in Turkish) is the only country in the world mostly<br />
covered by three biodiversity hotspots (Caucasus, Irano-Anatolian,<br />
Mediterranean). Turkey’s position at the nexus of Europe, the Middle<br />
East, Central Asia and Africa, its mountains and its encirclement by three<br />
seas have resulted in high terrestrial, fresh water, and marine biodiversity.<br />
However, our scientific knowledge of Turkey’s biodiversity and associated<br />
conservation challenges is insufficient, mainly due to limited research and<br />
language barriers. Addressing this gap is especially relevant today because<br />
the important biodiversity of Turkey is facing severe and growing threats,<br />
especially from business interests and the government. Turkey ranks 140th<br />
out of 163 countries in biodiversity and habitat conservation. As one of<br />
the earliest loci of human civilization, Turkey has experienced millennia<br />
of human activities that have degraded the original ecosystems on land<br />
and sea. Although Turkey’s total <strong>for</strong>est area increased by 5.9% since 1973,<br />
other important habitats such as endemic-rich Mediterranean chapparal,<br />
grasslands, coastal areas, wetlands, and rivers are disappearing, and rampant<br />
erosion is degrading steppes and rangelands. Current development-focused<br />
policies, particularly regarding water use, threaten to eliminate much of<br />
what remains. Development, dam construction, draining wetlands, and<br />
irrigation are the most widespread threats. The first goal of this paper is<br />
to broadly survey what is known about Turkey’s biodiversity, and identify<br />
the areas w<strong>here</strong> more research is needed. Our second goal is to identify<br />
the conservation challenges that Turkey is facing today and highlight<br />
the potential to preserve Turkey’s remaining biodiversity. Achieving this<br />
potential requires immediate action, international attention, and greater<br />
support <strong>for</strong> Turkey’s developing conservation capacity, and the expansion of<br />
a nascent Turkish conservation ethic.<br />
2011-12-09 15:15 Managing gene flow in species with fragmented<br />
distributions<br />
Ballou, J*, Smithsonian <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Biology</strong> Institute, Washington,<br />
DC, USA;<br />
The genetic consequences of population fragmentation continues to be one<br />
of the most significant challenges in conservation genetics. Fragmented<br />
populations experience loss of genetic diversity, accumulation of inbreeding,<br />
genetic divergence and evolution through genetic drift as opposed to<br />
natural selection, t<strong>here</strong>by reducing these populations’ evolutionary<br />
potential. It is well recognized that alleviating these adverse genetic effects<br />
requires re-establishing gene flow between fragments. Yet how this is<br />
best accomplished, particularly in populations with multiple fragments,<br />
is a complex issue requiring answers to many questions such as: Which<br />
individuals to migrate? How many individuals? How often? Between which<br />
fragments? When should gene flow begin? When it should be ceased? One<br />
approach to answering some of these questions is to model changes in the<br />
genetic structure of the population over its fragmentation history. These<br />
models can provide estimates of the relative degrees of inbreeding in the<br />
fragments, and genetic divergence between fragments, which can then be<br />
used to develop plans <strong>for</strong> maximizing the benefits of gene flow. Here we<br />
use this approach to propose gene flow strategies <strong>for</strong> two species: the tule<br />
elk (Cervus elaphus nannodes) in Cali<strong>for</strong>nia, and the golden lion tamarin<br />
(Leontopithecus rosalia) in Brazil.<br />
2011-12-06 14:00 A framework, methods and tools <strong>for</strong> integrating<br />
social considerations in marine spatial planning<br />
Ban, NC*, James Cook University;<br />
Recent marine planning and conservation literature emphasizes the<br />
importance of social considerations to improve success of implementation<br />
and long-term outcomes. In general, the rationale <strong>for</strong> integrating<br />
social considerations is that resulting plans and management actions<br />
are more likely to achieve their goals through improved compliance<br />
when stakeholders, including planners and scientists, are engaged in the<br />
planning process, and when management actions reflect more nuanced<br />
understandings of human behaviour and decision-making. Several bodies<br />
of knowledge outside of marine planning focus on the intricate links<br />
between ecosystems and people, rejecting the premise that they can be<br />
usefully viewed in complete isolation from one another. In particular, the<br />
social-ecological systems framework provides a lens <strong>for</strong> examining social<br />
considerations in marine spatial planning. Linking the social-ecological<br />
systems framework with a systematic approach to marine spatial planning<br />
promises to allow <strong>for</strong> more complete integration of social considerations<br />
in planning. It also opens the door to a vast array of relevant methods and<br />
tools from the social sciences that can improve how social considerations,<br />
including meaningful participation of actors, are addressed.<br />
2011-12-06 15:15 Bayesian decision networks applied to management<br />
of multiple stressors in coral reefs<br />
Ban, S*, ARC Centre of Excellence <strong>for</strong> Coral Reef Studies;<br />
Bayesian decision networks are an emerging tool in the management of<br />
complex, multi-stakeholder planning processes. They enable decision<br />
makers to solicit input and preferences from experts and non-experts alike<br />
through the use of subjective or qualitative knowledge and preferences<br />
about costs, threats, and values. Beyond weighting network/model<br />
parameters, stakeholder input may also drive the structure of the model<br />
itself. Decision networks also facilitate the evaluation of alternative scenarios<br />
based on factors such as stakeholder preferences and uncertainty about<br />
ecosystem responses. The management of coral reef ecosystems provides<br />
an ideal opportunity to employ Bayesian decision networks, particularly<br />
given the complexity and uncertainty associated with multiple stressor<br />
interactions, and the requirement to incorporate both terrestrial and marine<br />
management and stakeholder components. Here I provide an example of<br />
9