Abstracts available here - Society for Conservation Biology
Abstracts available here - Society for Conservation Biology
Abstracts available here - Society for Conservation Biology
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
25th International Congress <strong>for</strong> <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Biology</strong> • Auckland, New Zealand • 5-9 December 2011<br />
2011-12-09 11:30 MARAS: a system <strong>for</strong> monitoring structure,<br />
function and biodiversity in Patagonia rangelands. First data obtained<br />
in North Patagonia.<br />
Gaitan, J*, INTA, EEA Bariloche; Bran, D, INTA, EEA Bariloche;<br />
Oliva, G, INTA, EEA Santa Cruz;<br />
75 M hectares of temperate-cold rangelands in Patagonia, Argentina, are<br />
occupied by extensive sheep systems which provide wool to the international<br />
market. Sheep was introduced and rapidly expanded in Patagonia during<br />
the end of the XIX century. Sheep overgrazing produced land degradation<br />
and desertification in vast areas. For monitoring desertification trends,<br />
the MARAS (Monitores Ambientales para Regiones Aridas y Semiáridas)<br />
system is being deployed by INTA. It consists in ground monitors assessed<br />
with a single methodology all over the region. The sites are chosen in order<br />
to represent the main land units, and monitors are installed in paddocks<br />
with sheep grazing. Observations include: floristic composition, vegetation<br />
spatial structure and soil surface status on interpatches (adapted from<br />
Landscape Function Analysis). Soil organic carbon and texture are also<br />
tested. Time frame <strong>for</strong> reassessment is 5-years. The results obtained from<br />
the first MARAS’s indicators assessment are presented and discussed.<br />
2011-12-06 16:30 Tiritiri Matangi Island, New Zealand: <strong>Conservation</strong><br />
education through community involvement<br />
Galbraith, MP*, Unitec Institute of Technology; Jones, G, Unitec<br />
Institute of Technology;<br />
Tiritiri Matangi Island, Hauraki Gulf, New Zealand, has an international<br />
profile as a successful ecological restoration project, and is often cited as a<br />
model of environmental stewardship. Ecological restoration on the island<br />
has always involved, and been dependent on, voluntary public involvement.<br />
Public (volunteer) involvement was <strong>for</strong>malised in 1988 with the<br />
establishment of Supporters of Tiritiri Matangi (Inc.), an organization with<br />
aims to support and promote the restoration project. The contribution that<br />
the Supporters group has made to the island’s management has grown and<br />
diversified since its inception. From an initial focus on labour and funding<br />
<strong>for</strong> capital items, voluntary contributions now include supporting research<br />
and biodiversity management both physically and financially. Participation<br />
in this wider application of ecological concepts not only rein<strong>for</strong>ces links<br />
between the public and scientific communities, but also facilitates even<br />
greater understanding of concepts of biological conservation outside of the<br />
professional and academic worlds.<br />
2011-12-06 12:00 Improving plan implementation: blurring the<br />
distinction between spatial prioritization and strategic conservation<br />
planning<br />
Game, E.T.*, The Nature Conservancy; Groves, E. T., The Nature<br />
Conservancy;<br />
Much systematic conservation planning has focused on spatial prioritization<br />
- the identification of the best places to take conservation action. It is<br />
generally assumed that more detailed strategic planning to work out the best<br />
conservation actions in each location will occur once it is decided to work<br />
t<strong>here</strong>. The set of tools that conservation biologists use <strong>for</strong> strategic planning<br />
(developing, selecting and planning the implementation of conservation<br />
actions) are distinct from those used during spatial prioritization. However,<br />
as conservation embraces a wider range of strategies, often in collaboration<br />
with other sectors and industries, conservation priority will be influence<br />
as much by strategic opportunities as by the biodiversity present t<strong>here</strong>.<br />
This makes it inefficient to plan <strong>for</strong> the two separately. Here we describe<br />
The Nature Conservancy’s attempt to integrate its approaches to spatial<br />
planning (Ecoregional Assessment) and strategic planning (<strong>Conservation</strong><br />
Action Planning) into a single, more efficient planning framework that<br />
better answers the questions being asked by 21st centaury conservation.<br />
2011-12-08 18:30 How uncertain are climate impacts <strong>for</strong> African<br />
vertebrates? Exploring consensus in projections<br />
Garcia, RA*, Department of Biodiversity and Evolutionary <strong>Biology</strong>,<br />
National Museum of Natural Sciences, CSIC, Spain; Burgess,<br />
ND, Center <strong>for</strong> Macroecology, Evolution and Climate, Department<br />
of <strong>Biology</strong>, University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Cabeza, M,<br />
Metapopulation Research Group, Department of Biosciences, University<br />
of Helsinki, Finland; Rahbek, C, Center <strong>for</strong> Macroecology, Evolution<br />
and Climate, Department of <strong>Biology</strong>, University of Copenhagen,<br />
Denmark; Araujo, MB, Department of Biodiversity and Evolutionary<br />
<strong>Biology</strong>, National Museum of Natural Sciences, CSIC, Spain;<br />
Africa is predicted to be highly vulnerable to 21st century climatic changes,<br />
warranting more research to assess the impacts of these changes on the<br />
continent’s biodiversity. Assessing such impacts is, however, plagued by<br />
uncertainties. Markedly different estimates of changes in climatic suitability<br />
<strong>for</strong> species can be generated from alternative bioclimatic envelope models<br />
(BEM), greenhouse gas emissions scenarios, or global climate models.<br />
Using multiple BEMs, emissions scenarios and averages of co-varying<br />
climate simulations, we examine future projections of bioclimatic envelopes<br />
and their uncertainties <strong>for</strong> over 2,500 mammal, bird, amphibian and snake<br />
species in sub-Saharan Africa. BEMs emerge as the main source of overall<br />
uncertainty, affecting species turnover projections in Northern regions<br />
down to Congo, w<strong>here</strong> projected non-analogue climates cause BEMs to<br />
differ in how they extrapolate. Five consensus methodologies tested to<br />
summarise agreements among BEMs outper<strong>for</strong>m most single-models in<br />
accuracy, and generally provide consistent turnover estimates. In turn, the<br />
variability arising from alternative emissions scenarios increases towards<br />
late-century, when storylines diverge more, and affects particularly highturnover<br />
regions in Southern Africa. Our results lend support to the use of<br />
ensemble <strong>for</strong>ecasting to enable more in<strong>for</strong>med conservation decisions, as it<br />
provides a means of exploring and reducing uncertainties in projections of<br />
climatic suitability <strong>for</strong> species.<br />
2011-12-08 18:30 CHARACTERIZATION OF AN INTRODUCED<br />
POPULATION OF COTTON-TOP TAMARINS (Saguinus oedipus):<br />
FROM THE MYTHS TO THE CONSERVATION OPPORTUNITIES<br />
Garcia, S*, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana; Amaya, JD, Pontificia<br />
Universidad Javeriana;<br />
The cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus) is an endemic species of<br />
Colombia, which has been considered among the 25 most endangered<br />
primate species to extinction in the world due to high fragmentation of its<br />
natural habitat as well as illegal wildlife traffic. This has led to the species<br />
to be declared globally as critically endangered (CR) according to IUCN.<br />
Although, the distribution of this species in Colombia is restricted to some<br />
areas in the northwestern Caribbean coast, t<strong>here</strong> is a population outside<br />
its natural range in the Tayrona National Park (PNNT), as a result of an<br />
introduction in 1974 of a group of 16 to 30 individuals from captivity,<br />
released by a <strong>for</strong>mer environmental authority in Colombia. The apparently<br />
growing expansion of this specie at this PNNT has generated all kinds<br />
of assumptions and arguments about the success of this population out<br />
of its range, the potential effects generated on local biodiversity and how<br />
this phenomenon can be seen as an opportunity <strong>for</strong> the conservation<br />
of this specie. Answers to these questions and reflections are presented<br />
based on in<strong>for</strong>mation of population characterization of this specie at the<br />
PNNT, made by linear transect and follow focus group used to estimated<br />
the abundance and distribution of the specie, and through the results of<br />
the evaluation of potential environmental factors that could explain its<br />
successful presence in this area in contrast with their current status within<br />
the natural distribution range.<br />
2011-12-07 10:45 The importance of the human landscape in assessing<br />
conservation success<br />
Garnett, S.T.*, Charles Darwin University;<br />
Success with threatened species recovery tends to be assessed against<br />
biological indicators. Such indicators ignore the human context within<br />
which recovery takes place. In many ways threatened species are akin to<br />
poor human communities, and the conservation and recovery of threatened<br />
species has many parallels with community development. Here I propose<br />
a framework <strong>for</strong> assessing success in conservation management based<br />
on the five capitals of the sustainable livelihoods framework - natural,<br />
economic, human, physical and social. I then apply this framework to the<br />
Australian bird fauna. I demonstrate how often human and social capital is<br />
as important to threatened species recovery as biological or even economic<br />
indicators, and that ‘recovery’ cannot be assured unless threatened species<br />
continue to have support from skilled, committed individuals and strong<br />
institutions. Analysis within the full context of drivers of change is better<br />
able to highlight opportunities <strong>for</strong> action than examining the change in<br />
biological indicators alone. Using similar metrics <strong>for</strong> threatened species and<br />
55